John from Riverside Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 21 minutes ago, TSOL said: See, the Dems make it too personal. This is a grudge match, not racketeering I think that some of what you say there is true But The Dems have the law on their side Donald Trump makes this too easy 1 2 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 10 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: example 8,567,764- Democrats… deadbeats that are always working new angles to steal other peoples money. It was hyperbole, dude. It's punishment enough for the base to watch this all collapse. I'm just hoping that because of the intense humiliation, trump doesn't go down into a bunker and off himself 28 minutes ago, TSOL said: See, the Dems make it too personal. This is a grudge match, not racketeering it's both. We'll never get over Jan 6... Edited August 17, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) Maybe we can get him on tax fraud as well https://dnyuz.com/2023/08/17/how-trump-uses-supporters-donations-to-pay-his-legal-bills/ In 2021 and 2022, Save America spent $16 million on legal bills, The New York Times has reported. In the first six months of this year, almost a third of the money raised by his committees and the super PAC backing him has gone toward legal costs — more than $27 million, according to a Times analysis of federal records. The legal payments could have tax implications, some experts said, if the underlying legal matter were deemed by the Internal Revenue Service to be related to Mr. Trump personally, rather than to his official role. The payments could, in theory, count as taxable income for Mr. Trump. Edited August 17, 2023 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 22 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: I think that some of what you say there is true But The Dems have the law on their side Donald Trump makes this too easy I think I need to hear the actual evidence Smith intends to present. That might be when the trial starts. Based on what I 've heard so far, I'm having trouble getting beyond a conclusion that the government's case rests entirely on conjecture and some mindcrime argument premise. That saying one thing while believing something else is a crime. And somehow Smith employs mind reading experts that know the true thought of others. Knows when thier thoughts match their words and when they don't. If that's some or all of the basis of the case it laughable. And its 100% certainty that any conviction rendered and asisted by a favorable judge and jury will get overturned on appeals. Edited August 17, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 1 1
Tiberius Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I think I need to hear the actual evidence Smith intends to present. That might be when the trial starts. Based on what I 've heard so far, I'm having trouble getting beyond a conclusion that the government's case rests entirely on conjecture and some mindcrime argument premise. That saying one thing while believing something else is a crime. And somehow Smith employs mind reading experts that know the true thought of others. Knows when thier thoughts match their words and when they don't. If that's some or all of the basis of the case it laughable. And its 100% certainty that any conviction rendered and asisted by a favorable judge and jury will get overturned on appeals. Jurors can simply hear what people said, wrote and did and decide if their actions match the crime. No mind reading needed. He's going to jail...if he doesn't flee to Putin first 1 1
SectionC3 Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 2 hours ago, TSOL said: Now, in your opinion, is that something for the courts to decide? Or the media? The way you phrased your question unwittingly undercuts your point. Everyone is going to decide that issue. The legal determination, of course, will be made in a court or courts of law. But voters will also have input through at least the early primary process in 2024. And the court of public opinion is free to draw whatever conclusion is pleases.
Kemp Posted August 17, 2023 Author Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Chris farley said: Aw. the fascist mob was up late last night attacking anyone with different opinions. One day it's Commies. The next, fascist. Your group should get together and come up with a more coherent stance. 1 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 5 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Jurors can simply hear what people said, wrote and did and decide if their actions match the crime. No mind reading needed. He's going to jail...if he doesn't flee to Putin first I'm not quite as certain and I hope wins the primary, destroying R's chances in '24. But that would be interesting. How many MAGA's would follow? 1
Kemp Posted August 17, 2023 Author Posted August 17, 2023 31 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: It was hyperbole, dude. It's punishment enough for the base to watch this all collapse. I'm just hoping that because of the intense humiliation, trump doesn't go down into a bunker and off himself it's both. We'll never get over Jan 6... Guys like Trump don't off themselves. They make life miserable for others. 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Jurors can simply hear what people said, wrote and did and decide if their actions match the crime. No mind reading needed. He's going to jail...if he doesn't flee to Putin first Can you clearly articulate the spoken or written words, or deeds, and the case Smith intends to present per the indictment? 1
Westside Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 They have no evidence. Just feelz and self loathing. It’s a witch hunt. Nothing more. This will be another giant nothing burger. Can’t wait until this happens to joke bribem. 1 1
SoCal Deek Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 16 minutes ago, Kemp said: One day it's Commies. The next, fascist. Your group should get together and come up with a more coherent stance. Such as deplorable? 😉 1 1
Warcodered Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 12 hours ago, TSOL said: You're not gonna catch him, he's gonna keep on campaigning Power to the people! ✊🏾 I mean there's a distinct possibility he's going to get himself thrown jail until his trials, if he doesn't find a way to listen to what the judges are telling him, if he was anyone else he'd likely already be in jail. 1 1
TSOL Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 8 minutes ago, Warcodered said: I mean there's a distinct possibility he's going to get himself thrown jail until his trials, if he doesn't find a way to listen to what the judges are telling him, if he was anyone else he'd likely already be in jail. If they throw him in jail he becomes a pariah, they won't do that. He knows it and that's why he's acting the way he is 1
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 8 minutes ago, Kemp said: One day it's Commies. The next, fascist. Your group should get together and come up with a more coherent stance. don’t think those things can come together? Odd how party sycophants tend to correlate with a misunderstanding of history. 🤔 3 minutes ago, TSOL said: If they throw him in jail he becomes a pariah, they won't do that. He knows it and that's why he's acting the way he is yeah keep indicting, stall the trial convict, bleed financial resources on legal fees. They might even get a couple more election cycles out of this. 1 1
Warcodered Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, TSOL said: If they throw him in jail he becomes a pariah, they won't do that. He knows it and that's why he's acting the way he is I'm guessing you meant to say martyr because that's practically the opposite of that, also assuming that was the case and assuming whatever conspiracy you require for there to be an effort to avoid that, then why would they have indicted him in the first place?
TSOL Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 2 minutes ago, Warcodered said: I'm guessing you meant to say martyr because that's practically the opposite of that, also assuming that was the case and assuming whatever conspiracy you require for there to be an effort to avoid that, then why would they have indicted him in the first place? A martyr? They aren't going to kill him! 1 1
Warcodered Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 7 minutes ago, TSOL said: A martyr? They aren't going to kill him! You know that's not required right? 1
TSOL Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 1 minute ago, Warcodered said: You know that's not required right? Pariah is the word, that's what I'm going with. Idk maybe English isn't your first language and if so that's totally cool But I'll take pariah for $500 Alex 2 1
Warcodered Posted August 17, 2023 Posted August 17, 2023 1 minute ago, TSOL said: Pariah is the word, that's what I'm going with. Idk maybe English isn't your first language and if so that's totally cool But I'll take pariah for $500 Alex So they're not going to put Trump in jail for not listening to the orders of the judges in these cases because it'd make him a pariah? Pariah- someone or something that is despised or rejected. 2
Recommended Posts