The Walls be Closing

[SCBills]

11 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

If you still believe the lie that Trump has been indicted simply for saying the election was rigged, I would suggest you seek better sources of information. 

I do not .. although I do believe indictments could be levied against Abrams based off what was filed. 
 

As for the other cases, same goes for Hillary Clinton. 
 

It’s quite clear nobody else would have been prosecuted for what Trump did… except for Trump. 
 

He does himself no favors, but that should not matter if we truly had an equal system of justice in this country .. of which, we do not. 
 

Edited August 16, 2023 by SCBills

[Joe Ferguson forever]

19 minutes ago, SCBills said:

It’s quite clear nobody else would have been prosecuted for what Trump did… except for Trump. 

right.  So if you or I pulled this bs, nothing would happen to us.  just how many tiers do you believe the justice system should have?

Edited August 16, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillStime]

22 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

Wow.  Absolutely nails it.  
 

 

https://x.com/citizenfreepres/status/1691529213667356672?s=46&t=XnJPB0vm-gWk34ikDvnV1g

 

 

Why the heck are the tweets not showing

 

You have to change the x.com to twitter.com; copy and paste it into another window, and then click the copy link to post and it will load.

 

Either Invision has to update the software or Elon is f’n w everyone. 
 

Elon should have just left the website alone.

 

 

[SCBills]

8 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

right.  So if you or I pulled this bs, nothing would happen to us.

I have no idea what would happen any longer.   Probably depends on any number of factors, also including where the grand jury is from.  
 

This is where we’re at in our justice system. 
 

What I do know, to the best of my knowledge, is that neither of us are high ranking politicians. 
 

Up until this point, quite a bit of unlawful/pushing the boundaries type behavior has been permitted for those holding such offices because of how destructive a weaponized (or perceived to be weaponized) justice system would be to this country’s foundation.  
 

And we’ve decided to go down that path because some people want revenge and/or premeditated destruction of his candidacy.  
 

If you can’t see where this now goes.. then we likely won’t see eye to eye on this.  But that doesn’t change the fact Pandora’s box has been opened… and there’s no going back. 
 

 

Edited August 16, 2023 by SCBills

[Big Blitz]

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You have to change the x.com to twitter.com; copy and paste it into another window, and then click the copy link to post and it will load.

 

Either Invision has to update the software or Elon is f’n w everyone. 
 

Elon should have just left the website alone.

 

 

 

Hey thanks Bill!

 

 

Elon needs to fix this.  
 

Thanks.  

[SCBills]

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Hey thanks Bill!

 

 

Elon needs to fix this.  
 

Thanks.  

For me, I just wait a few seconds longer than I used to .. and the link embeds. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

3 minutes ago, SCBills said:

ushing the boundaries type behavior has been permitted for those holding such offices because of how destructive a weaponized (or perceived to be weaponized) system would be to this countries foundation.  
 

And we’ve decided to go down that path because some people want revenge and/or premeditated destruction of his candidacy.  

and that is wrong.  They're no different than us.  put their pants on one leg at a time (well x the over 80's- they have valets).  We agree.  Things could be better.

Edited August 16, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, SCBills said:

For me, I just wait a few seconds longer than I used to .. and the link embeds. 

 

You're lucky - but that doesn't work for me... 

 

I did notice that tweets load easier here on this site when using my laptop but not with my iPhone.

 

 

[BillStime]

lmao

 

 

[Big Blitz]

18 minutes ago, SCBills said:

For me, I just wait a few seconds longer than I used to .. and the link embeds. 

 

That worked before.  I don’t get it.  

[John from Riverside]

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Wow.  Absolutely nails it.  
 

 

https://x.com/citizenfreepres/status/1691529213667356672?s=46&t=XnJPB0vm-gWk34ikDvnV1g

 

 

Why the heck are the tweets not showing

It’s a conspiracyYyyyyyyyyy

[Boatdrinks]

9 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

Lies?

Just because you can't or won't see something doesn't make it less real.

https://www.nytimes.com/news-event/bookbans

Well, your stupid link to the NY slimes is requesting that I click on something to view it, which I will not do. However, I can see that these appear to be propaganda pieces over which books belong in schools (mostly ) attended by minors. Again,  a book not being available in a school library doesn’t mean it is banned from being read. These books are readily available elsewhere and can easily be read by anyone wishing to do so. Calling these books “ banned” is a huge exaggeration and would be rated “ mostly false” by all but the most liberal of fact checkers. 

[Kemp]

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

Wow.  Absolutely nails it.  
 

 

https://x.com/citizenfreepres/status/1691529213667356672?s=46&t=XnJPB0vm-gWk34ikDvnV1g

 

 

Why the heck are the tweets not showing

 

Is that THE Matt Kim?

[Kemp]

23 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Well, your stupid link to the NY slimes is requesting that I click on something to view it, which I will not do. However, I can see that these appear to be propaganda pieces over which books belong in schools (mostly ) attended by minors. Again,  a book not being available in a school library doesn’t mean it is banned from being read. These books are readily available elsewhere and can easily be read by anyone wishing to do so. Calling these books “ banned” is a huge exaggeration and would be rated “ mostly false” by all but the most liberal of fact checkers. 

I think I understand your logic.

 

People can still get to books even if it's made tougher for them.

 

Sorta like blacks can still vote even if you make it tougher for them.

 

 

[ChiGoose]

1 hour ago, SCBills said:

I do not .. although I do believe indictments could be levied against Abrams based off what was filed. 
 

As for the other cases, same goes for Hillary Clinton. 
 

It’s quite clear nobody else would have been prosecuted for what Trump did… except for Trump. 
 

He does himself no favors, but that should not matter if we truly had an equal system of justice in this country .. of which, we do not. 
 

Well this is blatantly false. Anyone who did what Trump did would not only have been charged but would likely not be out on bail pending trial. 

[BillsFanNC]

24 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Well this is blatantly false. Anyone who did what Trump did would not only have been charged but would likely not be out on bail pending trial. 

 

 

Kelly green sky today in your world today King?

[Tiberius]

16 hours ago, Irv said:

Trump didn't get a chance to do a lot of things thanks to the fake Fauci pandemic.  What a mess. 

And then he was cheated out of his re-election, duh 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

6 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Well, your stupid link to the NY slimes is requesting that I click on something to view it, which I will not do. However, I can see that these appear to be propaganda pieces over which books belong in schools (mostly ) attended by minors. Again,  a book not being available in a school library doesn’t mean it is banned from being read. These books are readily available elsewhere and can easily be read by anyone wishing to do so. Calling these books “ banned” is a huge exaggeration and would be rated “ mostly false” by all but the most liberal of fact checkers. 

People with direct authority over children are telling these impressionable little minds that these books are bad based on THEIR own politics (NOT their actual parents politics).  And you are complaining about propaganda. Freedumb....

Edited August 16, 2023 by redtail hawk

[Boatdrinks]

6 hours ago, Kemp said:

I think I understand your logic.

 

People can still get to books even if it's made tougher for them.

 

Sorta like blacks can still vote even if you make it tougher for them.

 

 

It’s not any tougher for them. This is a myth perpetuated by partisan liars such as yourself. Parents should have a say in what their children can access at school. This is not the same thing as a public library or bookstore. It’s not any more difficult for those of one race to vote than another. The rules are the same for all. Once again you receive the PPP dunce cap award. Bravo ! 

[Boatdrinks]

51 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

People with direct authority over children are telling these impressionable little minds that these books are bad based on THEIR own politics (NOT their actual parents politics).  And you are complaining about propaganda. Freedumb....

Direct authority over children …. You mean people such as parents ? Sure, impressionable little minds should should learn the wonders of gay relationships and same sex b***jobs, at school , right ? This is not politics, just simply having some moral standards in what children are exposed to in school. They’re still free to seek out pornography on their own time . Dunce cap award to you again.