Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/28/2023 at 10:30 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

1.  I think he should have left the documents at the WH, in spite of the wrongdoing by Biden, Clinton etc.  
2. Because the government allows such things. 
3. Yes, because the government allows such things. 
4.  See #3.

5.  I understand how you feel. 
6.  Addressed previously.

7.  Addresses previously. 

 

The government allowed him an enormous amount of time. He said F you to the government, so it's difficult to take you seriously on this.

Posted
23 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State and Democrat nominee for President, co-mingled classified and personal documents.  Joe Biden, former senator, VP, and current President has acknowledged possessing and maintaining classified material in a variety of places, including the garage of his personal residence.   Mike Pence, classified material, personal residence.  
 

Is it your contention that these three, high ranking government individuals had no personal documents within the 4 square walls of their personal residence(s).  No tax documents, medical bills, cell phone bills, children’s artwork, Corvette owner’s manuals etc?  

It seems fairly obvious that while frowned upon, it’s common knowledge that it happens, often, and there are apparently precious few safeguards to prevent the unauthorized removal of documents.   
 

I’ll go so far as to state that upon resolution of the SC Biden investigation, there will be no commentary, nor legal jeopardy, for Biden, nor the individuals who mishandled the classified documents on his behalf on a problem so vast and far reaching that our very nation is in peril.    When you factor in the Biden problem spans decades and multiple positions at the highest level of government, it seems clear to me that the stated rules are really more soft guidelines.
 

As for your second question, I’ve answered that multiple times.  I urge you to review the transcript if confusion lingers.  
 

 

 

 

 

 

You keep ignoring the central difference.

Trump refused to return the documents.

You can't acknowledge or dispute that, so all you're left with is blathering on.

Posted
1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

You keep ignoring the central difference.

Trump refused to return the documents.

You can't acknowledge or dispute that, so all you're left with is blathering on.

That is NOT the central difference. 
 

But if you believe that it is, can you tell us why “Trump refused to return them”? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 7/29/2023 at 6:40 PM, TH3 said:

It ain’t the party….it’s the GOP Voters….plenty of quality republicans….they have no shot to get elected. The cancer of white victim hood has to run its course…look no farther than this forum.

 

And they called us snowflakes.

Has there ever been a person in American politics with thinner skin than Trump?

On 7/29/2023 at 7:58 PM, BillsFanNC said:

Who are four useful idiots who are very likely attacking the messenger here?

 

You've chosen to ignore content by Kemp. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by The Frankish Reich. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by L Ron Burgundy. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by TH3. Options

 

Thank you.

1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

That is NOT the central difference. 
 

But if you believe that it is, can you tell us why “Trump refused to return them”? 

 

Because he's a moron who chose to put himself in greater legal jeopardy.

What's the Qanon reasoning on this?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

And they called us snowflakes.

Has there ever been a person in American politics with thinner skin than Trump?

 

Thank you.

 

Because he's a moron who chose to put himself in greater legal jeopardy.

What's the Qanon reasoning on this?

Okay….thanks. Just as I suspected you’d say. Blah, blah, blah Qanon, MAGA, hoax etc. 🙄

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Okay….thanks. Just as I suspected you’d say. Blah, blah, blah Qanon, MAGA, hoax etc. 🙄

 

I directly answered your question.

You didn't answer your own question.

Did you mistake one of my posts for another?

That's what it seems like.

Don't be ashamed of your mistake.

Posted
20 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

Except this all started before he even declared himself a candidate and the new charges are in regard to alleged crimes that were discovered during the existing investigation, but since you have blocked me - thanks again -, you won't see this.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Kemp said:

 

You keep ignoring the central difference.

Trump refused to return the documents.

You can't acknowledge or dispute that, so all you're left with is blathering on.

You've already said that multiple times, Kemp.  Have you forgotten (again)?

 

You asked 7 hard-hitting, well-researched, punch-in-the-gut questions, abandoned 5 upon my initial response, then the other two when it became apparent you hadn't really contemplated the answers to the questions that you prepared.  

 

A friendly word--don't just focus on the question, consider the answer you might receive based on information readily available.   

 

I appreciate you. 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Okay….thanks. Just as I suspected you’d say. Blah, blah, blah Qanon, MAGA, hoax etc. 🙄

Kemp currently is arguing with me because I suggested that Trump never should have taken the files to begin with.  I think he actually may be a MAGAnon. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Kemp currently is arguing with me because I suggested that Trump never should have taken the files to begin with.  I think he actually may be a MAGAnon. 

As I said earlier all any of this is going to do is set into motion the practice that Presidents will stand over their office on their final day and declare EVERYTHING in it to be unclassified, lest they get caught in this administrative process nonsense. Done! 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As I said earlier all any of this is going to do is set into motion the practice that Presidents will stand over their office on their final day and declare EVERYTHING in it to be unclassified, lest they get caught in this administrative process nonsense. Done! 

Our current system seems to have been fashioned using the Thunderdome model, where pretty much everything goes, no one gives a $&&$, and we can pretend nobody knew nothing about nothing for decades at a clip because of, uh, SLIPPAGE! 
 

Your suggestion actually makes sense. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Our current system seems to have been fashioned using the Thunderdome model, where pretty much everything goes, no one gives a $&&$, and we can pretend nobody knew nothing about nothing for decades at a clip because of, uh, SLIPPAGE! 
 

Your suggestion actually makes sense. 

Of course it makes sense! All of my suggestions do. 😉 The problem is that making sense is as far as the east is from the west in the administrative state. They pass law after law and install regulation after regulation but what they’ve yet to figure out is that people who want to break the law and ignore regulations are going to do just that. Trump isn’t being accused of espionage. He’s being accused of not following the administrative rules….which in Washington is the highest crime you can commit. And apparently far higher than extortion, bribery and corruption! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Of course it makes sense! All of my suggestions do. 😉 The problem is that making sense is as far as the east is from the west in the administrative state. They pass law after law and install regulation after regulation but what they’ve yet to figure out is that people who want to break the law and ignore regulations are going to do just that. Trump isn’t being accused of espionage. He’s being accused of not following the administrative rules….which in Washington is the highest crime you can commit. And apparently far higher than extortion, bribery and corruption! 

And fabricating intelligence to force a war that leads to the death of a million people, including thousands of our finest, and horrific injuries to tens of thousands more. 
 

For that, you get a cushy gig in Texas and an everlasting friendship with Barrack and ‘Shell, Bill n Hill.
 

🤷🏼‍♂️

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

And fabricating intelligence to force a war that leads to the death of a million people, including thousands of our finest, and horrific injuries to tens of thousands more. 
 

For that, you get a cushy gig in Texas and an everlasting friendship with Barrack and ‘Shell, Bill n Hill.
 

🤷🏼‍♂️

It’s ALL good as long as you’re doing the bidding from inside the beltway. But don’t dare try and shine a flashlight into the abyss! This is not Left against Right as so many on here and elsewhere naively believe. It’s Inside against Outside and getting worse all the time. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/31/us/trump-georgia-prosecutor-election.html

How many cases in a row can he lose?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/07/31/georgia-2020-election-investigation-trump/

Next indictment a coming.


A bunch of Republicans jockeying for VP spot under Trump.

Guess they're figuring when he goes down, they'll inherit the nomination.

Not a bad strategy. 

Edited by Kemp
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...