Doc Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/19/2023 at 12:11 PM, Tenhigh said: I agree that Trump lies more, but surely can you admit that Biden is an incredibly prolific lair. Expand No, they really can't. It's how they justify supporting a corrupt, incompetent 50+ year Congress critter. They all likely were the last ones to stop believing in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy. They might also still think pro wrestling is real... On 9/19/2023 at 4:41 PM, Tenhigh said: Super classy, doc. Bump for @Kemp, you must have missed my post... Expand Pathetic. Racist and uses the "R" word. Some "doc." 1
Kemp Posted September 20, 2023 Author Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 2:51 PM, Doc said: No, they really can't. It's how they justify supporting a corrupt, incompetent 50+ year Congress critter. They all likely were the last ones to stop believing in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the tooth fairy. They might also still think pro wrestling is real... Pathetic. Racist and uses the "R" word. Some "doc." Expand Do you believe Trump broke the law when he handed a do list on classified documents to someone without security clearance?. 1 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:03 PM, Kemp said: Do you believe Trump broke the law when he handed a do list on classified documents to someone without security clearance?. Expand How did bidens docs get to the Penn Center after he was VP? 1 2
Kemp Posted September 20, 2023 Author Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:06 PM, Chris farley said: How did bidens docs get to the Penn Center after he was VP? Expand By changing the subject, you proved that you believe Trump broke the law when he handed classified documents to someone without clearance. Thank you for that. That alone is good enough for a conviction. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 (edited) On 9/20/2023 at 3:11 PM, Kemp said: By changing the subject, you proved that you believe Trump broke the law when he handed classified documents to someone without clearance. Thank you for that. That alone is good enough for a conviction. Expand yeah. that's how debate and criminality work. amazing. Edited September 20, 2023 by Chris farley 1
Doc Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:11 PM, Kemp said: By changing the subject, you proved that you believe Trump broke the law when he handed classified documents to someone without clearance. Thank you for that. That alone is good enough for a conviction. Expand He wasn't changing the subject: he was providing an example of criminality by the leader of the Dem party. That you simps are justifing it because "he gave them back as soon as he knew" tells me how serious to take you all. 1
Kemp Posted September 20, 2023 Author Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:14 PM, Chris farley said: yeah. that's how debate and criminality work. amazing. Expand We weren't involved in a debate or even a conversation. If you care to answer my question, you be sure to let me know. Until then, have fun not answering it. 2
wnyguy Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:03 PM, Kemp said: Do you believe Trump broke the law when he handed a do list on classified documents to someone without security clearance?. Expand Doesn't Trump, as President, have the ability to declassify documents as he sees fit? 1
Kemp Posted September 20, 2023 Author Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:19 PM, Doc said: He wasn't changing the subject: he was providing an example of criminality by the leader of the Dem party. That you simps are justifing it because "he gave them back as soon as he knew" tells me how serious to take you all. Expand I don't remember asking him about anything Biden did. Can you point it out? If I had, we could debate that. Like Farley, you seem not to know what debate even means. Did Trump break the law when he used classified documentation as a notepad and then give it to someone without security clearance? Do you know the answer?
cle23 Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:19 PM, Doc said: He wasn't changing the subject: he was providing an example of criminality by the leader of the Dem party. That you simps are justifing it because "he gave them back as soon as he knew" tells me how serious to take you all. Expand But that works both ways. If you think it's criminal that Biden did it, but don't care that Trump did it, that's the same thing. It sure appears that most Presidents take documents they shouldn't, and then try to make it appear as though it was accidental. I am sure some are. But I am also sure that most aren't accidental. That's a separate debate. But it is an escalation when the documents Trump had were requested to be returned, and he didn't. That is an issue. On 9/20/2023 at 3:35 PM, wnyguy said: Doesn't Trump, as President, have the ability to declassify documents as he sees fit? Expand Yes, if he takes the proper steps to do it. It can't be after the fact, and it can't be "I thought it."
ChiGoose Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:19 PM, Doc said: He wasn't changing the subject: he was providing an example of criminality by the leader of the Dem party. That you simps are justifing it because "he gave them back as soon as he knew" tells me how serious to take you all. Expand Bragging about your ignorance of the law sure is a mood, but you do you buddy.
wnyguy Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:36 PM, cle23 said: Yes, if he takes the proper steps to do it. It can't be after the fact, and it can't be "I thought it." Expand Okay, thanks for the info. What are the steps that have to be made? 1
ChiGoose Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:40 PM, wnyguy said: Okay, thanks for the info. What are the steps that have to be made? Expand Here you go Side note: Trump's retaining possession of the documents after being notified that he needed to return them was contrary to the law even if they weren't classified.
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:40 PM, wnyguy said: Okay, thanks for the info. What are the steps that have to be made? Expand LOL, you can just go to MSNBC to get those same narratives. 1
wnyguy Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:43 PM, ChiGoose said: Here you go Side note: Trump's retaining possession of the documents after being notified that he needed to return them was contrary to the law even if they weren't classified. Expand Thanks for the link. I guess we have to see what this document that Kemp is carrying on about actually was because it may be that the document was no longer Classified, or if it was a document that threatened national security then Trump should be held accountable. 1 1
Pokebball Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:11 PM, Kemp said: By changing the subject, you proved that you believe Trump broke the law when he handed classified documents to someone without clearance. Thank you for that. That alone is good enough for a conviction. Expand or, that alone can prevent the conviction 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:29 PM, Kemp said: We weren't involved in a debate or even a conversation. If you care to answer my question, you be sure to let me know. Until then, have fun not answering it. Expand Don't expect more than an eyeroll from Fartly. Now this is big news. Lin Wood has turned on treump https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/20/trump-georgia-election-case-lin-wood-is-witness-da-says.html On 9/20/2023 at 4:58 PM, Pokebball said: or, that alone can prevent the conviction Expand changing the subject can?
Doc Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 3:35 PM, Kemp said: I don't remember asking him about anything Biden did. Can you point it out? If I had, we could debate that. Like Farley, you seem not to know what debate even means. Did Trump break the law when he used classified documentation as a notepad and then give it to someone without security clearance? Do you know the answer? Expand All I need to do is point out your hypocrisy. As for the classified document, can she prove that claim? On 9/20/2023 at 3:36 PM, cle23 said: But that works both ways. If you think it's criminal that Biden did it, but don't care that Trump did it, that's the same thing. It sure appears that most Presidents take documents they shouldn't, and then try to make it appear as though it was accidental. I am sure some are. But I am also sure that most aren't accidental. That's a separate debate. But it is an escalation when the documents Trump had were requested to be returned, and he didn't. That is an issue. Yes, if he takes the proper steps to do it. It can't be after the fact, and it can't be "I thought it." Expand I've been saying it's criminal for both. Or criminal for neither. On 9/20/2023 at 3:38 PM, ChiGoose said: Bragging about your ignorance of the law sure is a mood, but you do you buddy. Expand They are not allowed to take classified material, period. That you don't care because it's allegedly "spillage" and all you care about it he gave it back immediately despite having it for years and doing who knows what with it, well, you do you buddy. 3
Tommy Callahan Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 5:35 PM, Doc said: I've been saying it's criminal for both. Or criminal for neither. Expand 100% and without that, it gives the impression of a politicized justice department. 1 1
Pokebball Posted September 20, 2023 Posted September 20, 2023 On 9/20/2023 at 5:35 PM, Doc said: I've been saying it's criminal for both. Or criminal for neither. Expand I'm not sure this is even the case. The presidential record act only applied to one of 'em! 1
Recommended Posts