BillsShredder83 Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 12 hours ago, Chaos said: just curious for the more cap knowledgeable posters, it saves $5.4m, but how much was the check TP cut today then? Quote
TOboy Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 1 minute ago, BillsShredder83 said: just curious for the more cap knowledgeable posters, it saves $5.4m, but how much was the check TP cut today then? Not sure exactly, depends on the number of year’s remaining. If it’s 3 yrs for example, would cost $16.2M to save $5.4M. You can do the math from there, but it’s basically an extra $5.4 per year remaining as it’s spreading the cap hit equally over year’s remaining. 1 Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 Evidently NFL contracts have language allowing the team to make these decisions unilaterally. It is good for the player because it gets them money sooner. But Diggs did not have to agree to this restructure. Quote
TOboy Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 26 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: Evidently NFL contracts have language allowing the team to make these decisions unilaterally. It is good for the player because it gets them money sooner. But Diggs did not have to agree to this restructure. SOME NFL contracts have that language. No idea if Diggs deal did. That said, you’re right that it benefits the player in getting cash up front. Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 13 hours ago, Reed83HOF said: LOL clicked the wrong emoji Lies ALL LIES I TELL YOU thanks for the reply 1 Quote
Reed83HOF Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: Lies ALL LIES I TELL YOU thanks for the reply There's an emoji for you Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 Just now, Reed83HOF said: There's an emoji for you ha ha ha 1 minute ago, Reed83HOF said: There's an emoji for you now FIX IT!!!!! 1 Quote
Hebert19 Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 15 hours ago, Hebert19 said: So it feels like poyer and someone else. Guess I was right and some yall were wrong. Quote
BarleyNY Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 2 hours ago, Matt_In_NH said: Evidently NFL contracts have language allowing the team to make these decisions unilaterally. It is good for the player because it gets them money sooner. But Diggs did not have to agree to this restructure. Not all contracts have team option restructures in them. The ones that do have it generally only have it in one or two of the early seasons. Diggs’ extension was probably one that did have it. Also the option can’t add void years so if you see that done it was with player approval. Quote
Utah John Posted March 15, 2023 Posted March 15, 2023 Predictable move. Good move. This is what normally happens when a very good team wants to keep as many of its parts together as possible. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.