Jump to content

Edmunds to Bears


Roundybout

Recommended Posts

This kid has had way too many people in his ear. Lorax claiming he’ll be a HOFer before 1 game played. Did it go to his head? I don’t think so. But he sure helped us lose a humiliating game to NE last year. No reason for his horrific play misdiagnoses. He’s the Ron Burgundy of MLB’s in that all you have to do is look him off and you’ve got a completion. Cannot stress enough that I’m glad he’s gone and we can finally stop talking about him. 

I only said I haven’t missed a game since 1991 but I’ve watched them for 40+ years. And living thousands of miles away, before Sunday Ticket, made watching every freakin game very difficult, but I did it. So, tell ME…which player, non-QB, has created more animosity and conversation than Tremaine? It’s been like this since DAY ONE. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Eastport bills said:

You’re not getting those guys on the cheap. Maybe not Edmunds #,. but you think those guys could be deployed in 2LB defenses and play every down. Edmunds allowed our young secondary to play nickel all game. These guys are long in the tooth and Edmunds is 24.


Yet Wagner outperformed Tremaine next year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're going to overpay a bit, I'd prefer it be for offense.  What does a defense have to do anymore?  Get a couple turnovers and prevent 2-3 drives from scoring.  If you can do that without paying your two starting LB's over $25 million combined, then don't.  Congrats to Tremain though for being a gentleman here and representing both himself and the Bills with class.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was and still am a fan of Edumonds but there is no way this team could have ponied up 18 million aav with a big guarantee for him. He is a good player and in free agency good young players get paid like elite players. The Bears had the luxury of overpaying for a good player, they don't have a lot of big contracts and their QB is on a rookie deal.

 

This team will have to find a way to replace the production of Edumonds who was very good in coverage and esp this past season solid against the run. But I would rather invest the cap dollars on offense and try to replace Edumonds cheaply in the draft or with a lower mid-level free agent. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

i dont disagree, just sucks to have the best NCB in the game, have given him a nice contract, and now hes a very situational player?

 

Nobody shoot me here, but if theoretically we go back to a 4-3, what would taron's trade value be?  not advocating it, just thinking of questions beanes sorting through

Nobody runs a 43 or a 34 the majority of the time anymore 

 

There’s too much speed and wide receivers on the field

 

The NFL is all about sub packages …. Nickel and Hybrid dime defenses 

 

Even if we use more 43 looks it would never be close to 70% like base defenses 25 years ago

 

you can run more 43 and keep Taron on the team lol

 

 

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

The funniest thing was if we had the cap room, this board would be over the moon if we signed a 24 year old with his tools and production. 

Production? In 5 seasons he produced 6.5 sacks, 5 picks, 2 Forced Fumbles, and 37 stuffs for 71 yards lost. 

So in a typical season that's 1.5 sacks, 1 interception, likely 0 forced fumbles, and a run stuff every other game for a 2 yard loss. 

Not an impact player for $18M/season. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sry if this was already discussed, but does this all but guarantee at least 4th round comp pick to us? Assuming that we will not sign any other FA with bigger deal then we just give to Connor McGovern?

 

I have no idea how the formula works, but this looks like a huge deal which could fetch a 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Do you think the Bears are going to play a conventional 4/3 with Edmunds outside?

I don’t. Eberflus’s defense is 4-3, but they are 4-2-5 80% of the time. Something like that. It’s similar to our defense. I’m guessing they play Tremaine at Mike and Edwards at Will with Sanborn at Sam. But the majority of the time it’s going to be Edwards and Tremaine on the field imo. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

I don’t. Eberflus’s defense is 4-3, but they are 4-2-5 80% of the time. Something like that. It’s similar to our defense. I’m guessing they play Tremaine at Mike and Edwards at Will with Sanborn at Sam. But the majority of the time it’s going to be Edwards and Tremaine on the field imo. 

 

Thank you. 

 

I don't follow the Bears a lot, but it was my impression they were playing majority Nickel.

 

Smart teams typically don't pay top dollar for a FA with the intention of using them in an entirely different way than the way they succeeded enough to become top dollar FA.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...