Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, SWATeam said:

Glad he’s back, he was criminally underused.

 

the most head scratching aspect of the entire year was the major emphasis on finding multiple pass catching backs, only to never use them.

 

 

As I understand it, Allen's injury made it harder for him to throw short with accuracy.

 

I think that explains it. 

 

I'd expect to see more of it next year. Assuming that's the explanation.

Posted
4 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

As I understand it, Allen's injury made it harder for him to throw short with accuracy.

 

I think that explains it. 

 

I'd expect to see more of it next year. Assuming that's the explanation.

 

Some of that. Some Josh hates throwing to running backs anyway. He regularly misses running backs open in space because he is holding the ball waiting for something to open up deep (it is just one of the things you live with because of everything else he brings). Thirdly, we suck at running back screens. I don't know what it is about them but we seem to telegraph them really obviously. When we are about to throw one I can call it out from home so I am pretty darn sure NFL defensive coordinators can. 

  • Agree 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Some of that. Some Josh hates throwing to running backs anyway. He regularly misses running backs open in space because he is holding the ball waiting for something to open up deep (it is just one of the things you live with because of everything else he brings). Thirdly, we suck at running back screens. I don't know what it is about them but we seem to telegraph them really obviously. When we are about to throw one I can call it out from home so I am pretty darn sure NFL defensive coordinators can. 

Perhaps now having two athletic guards with movement skills will help with running back screens

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

Perhaps now having two athletic guards with movement skills will help with running back screens

 

Here's hoping but it is almost the first bit I think we find harder. Most of our running back screens get blown up not because Josh gets sacked or knocked down by the intentional free rusher but because teams actually realise it is a screen and don't rush. Having athletic guards helps the 2nd bit which is once the pass rush has sold out and Josh dumps it down to the running back hiding behind the screen getting out to block the LBs and DBs. I feel like if we get that far we have been okay. It's the first bit we seem to struggle with... teams identify screen and instead of rushing they drop into the shallow zones and there is nowhere for Josh to go with the ball and he ends up chucking it at someone's feet as a dead play. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Here's hoping but it is almost the first bit I think we find harder. Most of our running back screens get blown up not because Josh gets sacked or knocked down by the intentional free rusher but because teams actually realise it is a screen and don't rush. Having athletic guards helps the 2nd bit which is once the pass rush has sold out and Josh dumps it down to the running back hiding behind the screen getting out to block the LBs and DBs. I feel like if we get that far we have been okay. It's the first bit we seem to struggle with... teams identify screen and instead of rushing they drop into the shallow zones and there is nowhere for Josh to go with the ball and he ends up chucking it at someone's feet as a dead play. 

Why does that happen? Are we bad poker players, is there a tell? It's just a shame not to have the screen game as an effective part of the offense.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Dr. Who said:

Why does that happen? Are we bad poker players, is there a tell? It's just a shame not to have the screen game as an effective part of the offense.

 

I think there's some validity to the way teams rush Allen.  

 

We have one of the most athletic OL's in the NFL.. there's no reason every screen should end up as Allen spiking it into the dirt. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Settling for Cook + Hines and adding McGovern isn’t moving the needle on what the Bills need to balance the offense. Concerning that some fans are already starting to massage this into a viable strategy.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Airseven said:

Settling for Cook + Hines and adding McGovern isn’t moving the needle on what the Bills need to balance the offense. Concerning that some fans are already starting to massage this into a viable strategy.

Fans are not "massaging" this signing into a viable strategy.  We're one day into FA and we haven't held the draft.  How about we wait until after these two are done before declaring what fans are settling for?

 

BTW, adding McGovern has moved the needle and improved the Bill's O line.  The key here is the change not the absolute impact of a guy like McGovern. Staffold was one of the worst pass blocking guards in the NFL, McGovern is in the middle in pass pro.  That represents a huge improvement.  Staffold also got hit with a lot of penalties whereas McGovern is rarely penalized.  Adding McGovern has improved the O line.

 

With respect to Cook, we should see further improvement as he goes from his rookie to his 2nd year in the NFL.  And Cook showed real flashes of being the best Bills RB since Shady.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, CincyBillsFan said:

Fans are not "massaging" this signing into a viable strategy.  We're one day into FA and we haven't held the draft.  How about we wait until after these two are done before declaring what fans are settling for?

 

BTW, adding McGovern has moved the needle and improved the Bill's O line.  The key here is the change not the absolute impact of a guy like McGovern. Staffold was one of the worst pass blocking guards in the NFL, McGovern is in the middle in pass pro.  That represents a huge improvement.  Staffold also got hit with a lot of penalties whereas McGovern is rarely penalized.  Adding McGovern has improved the O line.

 

With respect to Cook, we should see further improvement as he goes from his rookie to his 2nd year in the NFL.  And Cook showed real flashes of being the best Bills RB since Shady.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fella only ever posts disparaging, negative comments. If he's an actual Bills' fan, he's indistinguishable from a troll

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

Fans are not "massaging" this signing into a viable strategy.  We're one day into FA and we haven't held the draft.  How about we wait until after these two are done before declaring what fans are settling for?

 

BTW, adding McGovern has moved the needle and improved the Bill's O line.  The key here is the change not the absolute impact of a guy like McGovern. Staffold was one of the worst pass blocking guards in the NFL, McGovern is in the middle in pass pro.  That represents a huge improvement.  Staffold also got hit with a lot of penalties whereas McGovern is rarely penalized.  Adding McGovern has improved the O line.

 

With respect to Cook, we should see further improvement as he goes from his rookie to his 2nd year in the NFL.  And Cook showed real flashes of being the best Bills RB since Shady.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well said.  

 

These obviously aren't the only moves we make, and even if they were..  Cook in Year 2 is a better RB than rookie Cook or Singletary.  Hines with an off-season should theoretically become more integrated into the Offense.  

 

Re: McGovern, even if all he gives us good pass blocking and poor run blocking, that's a massive improvement over last year.  Given he's reportedly a better RG than LG, we are able to give him that spot on our OL, which also moves Bates to LG... the position he feels more comfortable in.   This one move has upgraded both LG and RG, while giving us two athletic 25 year olds on multi-year contracts.  

 

If we go RT at 27 and/or Brown makes a jump with a full, healthy off-season, this OL could become a strength. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Airseven said:

Settling for Cook + Hines and adding McGovern isn’t moving the needle on what the Bills need to balance the offense. Concerning that some fans are already starting to massage this into a viable strategy.

 

How many hours into the offseason are we?

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Airseven said:

Settling for Cook + Hines and adding McGovern isn’t moving the needle on what the Bills need to balance the offense. Concerning that some fans are already starting to massage this into a viable strategy.

It’s been 25 hours.  But you be you

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 3/13/2023 at 9:55 AM, Beck Water said:

 

Does anyone know exactly how they handled it yet?

Welp, we do now - and there wasn’t as much improvement as I had hoped. Bummer. 

Posted
15 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

As I understand it, Allen's injury made it harder for him to throw short with accuracy.

 

I think that explains it. 

 

I'd expect to see more of it next year. Assuming that's the explanation.

Allen is still developing his touch passes… Hitting a back in stride on a screen pass is as important as speedy pulling OL 

Posted
11 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Some of that. Some Josh hates throwing to running backs anyway. He regularly misses running backs open in space because he is holding the ball waiting for something to open up deep (it is just one of the things you live with because of everything else he brings). Thirdly, we suck at running back screens. I don't know what it is about them but we seem to telegraph them really obviously. When we are about to throw one I can call it out from home so I am pretty darn sure NFL defensive coordinators can. 

 

Can you identify what you're keying on for us?

1 hour ago, Dr. Who said:

Fella only ever posts disparaging, negative comments. If he's an actual Bills' fan, he's indistinguishable from a troll

 

He's so indistinguishable that...wait for it...some put him in an ignore file and never respond to him

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

Can you identify what you're keying on for us?

 

So I think it is the way the lineman come off the snap. You really have to sell "I'm in my pass pro stance" and it is almost like a "I'm in stand still mode until Josh dumps it." 

 

I just no that by the time the ball gets to Josh my brain has gone "screen." Reminds me of one of the early Madden games where there was a "screen" audio that the defense would shout when it realised you were running one. I hear that Madden shout in my head really quickly. And I am not saying it is 100% but when that flashes into my head as we snap it seems to follow through a fair amount. 

 

Whatever it is I hope the Bills self scout it really hard. Because I feel like we never get that called running back screen where the Dline all rush normally and Josh can just pop it over the line to the back hovering behind the screen. In contrast at times it feels like 80% of the Chargers offense.

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...