Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Chaos said:

Hurts, Lance/Purdy, Burrows all disagree. 

Again, “the majority of  teams”, four is not a majority by any measure, 

Posted
7 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:

Bears traded the #1 pick to the panthers!! I love it

 

Bears get:

DJ Moore 
#9 pick this year
2nd rounder this year
Next years 1st rounder 
2025 2nd rounder


and Panthers get their franchise QB

 

Good trade for both sides.

 

if I were the bears I would’ve traded Fields and drafted Young. You get a couple more years of a cheap franchise QB who is a better passer than Fields but I get it. I think this was the perfect trade for both sides since the bears were staying with fields. 
 

Panthers could easily win the division as soon as this year with Reich and mccown having a clean slate leading Young or even Stroud. 
 

Hopefully more of these young QBs start heading to the NFC from now on

If they hit on their lottery ticket they do. Still around 20% chance of they happening. Look at the great QB class of 2018. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Victory Formation said:

Anthony Richardson is a lot like Josh Allen as far as what he can do as a runner. He’s tall, he’s well built, he’s physical, he’s a load to bring down.

 

Would I trade multiple first round picks to move up and get him? NO. But if I’m a team picking in the top 10, I would take him in a heartbeat.

 

Basically Anthony Richardson is an extremely nice project if you’re a team that is patient and willing to develop a QB. He has a big arm and if he develops as a passer he’s easily in the upper echelon of starting QBs in the NFL.

 

Is he JaMarcus Russell? Or is he Josh Allen? Only time will tell.

Richardson will be very interesting to watch develop. So much depends on the team that takes him. Looking forward to seeing it. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Draconator said:

 

Wow, great trade for the Bears. Exactly what they needed.  IMO, none of these QBs is worth that much, but Carolina had to do something like this.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
15 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

That's the thought. Unless we get another "Baker Mayfield" genius type decision.

 

 

Compensation seems light to me. I guess since they are staying in the top 10 it isnt so bad, but all they got extra was another 1st, a 2nd, an equivalent 4th (2 yr 2nd), and WR Moore. Surprised they couldnt milk more from Indy.

 

Disagree.  I think it’s a really nice haul in a year where there’s no great QB prospects.  Excellent move for Chicago.

Posted
15 hours ago, stevestojan said:

I’m admittedly not a big college football guy, but did I miss a generational QB coming up in this draft? 

People will tell you no and I kind agree but guess what? Most people have no idea what they are talking about. 2017 was supposed to be a bad qb draft. Well if produced pre-rapist Watson and Mahomes, who are top 5 qbs, who went after tribusky. Allen’s draft was supposed to be a legendary one and the lowest drafted ones - Allen and Jackson are the only good ones. No one thought Herbert was going to be this good. Despite people acting like they know, they don’t know anything. 😉

 

so if the panthers put this new guy in a good situation like the bills and chiefs (read about terrible of an idea it was trading up for Mahomes was during his draft!) did with their guys and he definitely be worth the price. The panthers have a really good defense and a bunch of cap room. 

 

I absolute love this deal for the Bears. Fields has dog crap talent around him.  They go from maybe the worst offensive talent do a very good receiving group. Now need to build up the o line. I think Fields will take a huge step forward and the bears might be the most improved team in the nfl. I’m hammering their over in wins. 

44 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Richardson will be very interesting to watch develop. So much depends on the team that takes him. Looking forward to seeing it. 

Agreed. He was the prospect like Allen that I absolutely loved in the later rounds but hated as a high pick because they should be more polished. But I think nfl thinking has changed. They used the dual threat and rpos so much more in the pros. Also, some nfl coaches just think they are probably better coaches than colleges ones.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, mannc said:

Wow, great trade for the Bears. Exactly what they needed.  IMO, none of these QBs is worth that much, but Carolina had to do something like this.

I agree, but I also think the Bears will be finishing bottom third in the rankings again next year so at least having two first round picks, can get them in position to draft Maye next year. I’ll root for fields to do well, but if we’re being honest, he improved in his play this year and they still were the worst team in football. I don’t think his ceiling is much higher than what he did this year. But I hope I’m wrong.

 

Another way to look at it. Joe Burrow went to an inept Bengals team and although a torn ACL his rookie year got them the #4 pick and Chase, they haven’t sniffed the NFLs gutter since. It’s hard to find these Franchise QBs but I don’t think teams should settle for what they have when in a position to keep swinging until they hit on one. 
 

This is the make or break year for Fields. He has Moore and Claypool and I’m sure the bears will invest more (no pun intended) around him to give him every opportunity to be successful. 
 

Panthers get, according to vegas, CJ stroud. He throws the prettiest most catchable ball in this class. I love the way he drops it in to his WRs on intermediate routes. I question his decision making and deep ball accuracy but he’s got Frank Reich and Josh Mccown. He also seems to have a good head on his shoulders from listening to him talk. I don’t love any of these QBs but I think he’s going to be set up for really good success early on in. That garbage division. 
 

Great trade now let’s hope the bills can trade a couple orders of Duffs wings for Deandre Hopkins and sign Lavonte David before this draft

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, BillsShredder83 said:

its a roll of the dice you want to take. most werent exactly drooling over Hurts or Herbert.... or josh lol instinct is to say i like the bears side better but teams have been wrong about this kinda thing a lot

2 - 1 = 1 huh?  is that pick this year or next year lol

Yup. It’s hilarious watching people dismiss qb prospects so early. I didn’t believe in Allen and couldn’t have been more wrong. I still tend to favor guys who weren’t playing with a ton of talent (Alabama) and were productive players. But Allen’s success broke me brain so I can’t dismiss anyone with any certainty.

4 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

I agree, but I also think the Bears will be finishing bottom third in the rankings again next year so at least having two first round picks, can get them in position to draft Maye next year. I’ll root for fields to do well, but if we’re being honest, he improved in his play this year and they still were the worst team in football. I don’t think his ceiling is much higher than what he did this year. But I hope I’m wrong.

 

Another way to look at it. Joe Burrow went to an inept Bengals team and although a torn ACL his rookie year got them the #4 pick and Chase, they haven’t sniffed the NFLs gutter since. It’s hard to find these Franchise QBs but I don’t think teams should settle for what they have when in a position to keep swinging until they hit on one. 
 

This is the make or break year for Fields. He has Moore and Claypool and I’m sure the bears will invest more (no pun intended) around him to give him every opportunity to be successful. 
 

Panthers get, according to vegas, CJ stroud. He throws the prettiest most catchable ball in this class. I love the way he drops it in to his WRs on intermediate routes. I question his decision making and deep ball accuracy but he’s got Frank Reich and Josh Mccown. He also seems to have a good head on his shoulders from listening to him talk. I don’t love any of these QBs but I think he’s going to be set up for really good success early on in. That garbage division. 
 

Great trade now let’s hope the bills can trade a couple orders of Duffs wings for Deandre Hopkins and sign Lavonte David before this draft

That’s a great point too. That outdated idea of drafting a wrong qb setting franchise back like 10 years is dumb. The bears get to see what fields, who’s one of the most physically talented qbs in the nfl, gets to do with legit talent around him. And if he’s not good enough, they have a ton of ammo to get a new guy. Great job by them.

 

also, awesome FU by Lovie to the Texans.

Edited by C.Biscuit97
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

It’s an odd trade. Based on what I’ve read the Panthers like a few of the quarterbacks and are not focused on just one. It’s not like there is an Andrew Luck or Elway out there where everyone sees them as a can’t miss prospect, head and shoulders above everyone else. Reich got tired of coaching without a reliable qb. Hope they pick the right guy. At the combine I was impressed with Levis from Kentucky. Nice compact throwing motion and a strong arm. We’ll see.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Sestak4ever said:

It’s an odd trade. Based on what I’ve read the Panthers like a few of the quarterbacks and are not focused on just one. It’s not like there is an Andrew Luck or Elway out there where everyone sees them as a can’t miss prospect, head and shoulders above everyone else. Reich got tired of coaching without a reliable qb. Hope they pick the right guy. At the combine I was impressed with Levis from Kentucky. Nice compact throwing motion and a strong arm. We’ll see.

Mahomes wasn’t a can’t miss prospect like luck and KC got laughed at for trading up. Imagine how that looks now. The bills should have gotten 5 1st rounds pick at least. 
 

the panthers have a pretty solid team. They have a sneaky good defense and before he went wirh all retread qbs, reich was one of the better qb coaches in the league.  They can draft a guy and put him in an Allen type situation where he doesn’t have to carry the team and grow. I like this move for them and love it for the bears. 

Posted

I think it’s hilarious reading through the comments and the amount of people saying the Panthers got hosed and then there is just as many people saying the Bears got hosed! Guess that means it’s actually probably a pretty even trade 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Sestak4ever said:

It’s an odd trade. Based on what I’ve read the Panthers like a few of the quarterbacks and are not focused on just one. It’s not like there is an Andrew Luck or Elway out there where everyone sees them as a can’t miss prospect, head and shoulders above everyone else. Reich got tired of coaching without a reliable qb. Hope they pick the right guy. At the combine I was impressed with Levis from Kentucky. Nice compact throwing motion and a strong arm. We’ll see.


I like the trade for both teams.

 

Panthers could still trade down (Indy?), recoup assets (‘24 1st?), and still get a top 3 QB if they aren’t enamored with Stroud. Essentially it’d be a means to move into the top 4 for a top 3 QB prospect and not having to be without a 1st next year.

Posted
16 hours ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

2 1sts (at least 1 inside the top 10 still)

2 2nds

& DJ Moore (25 years old) who would fetch a first rounder as well.  

 

Great deal for the Bears!

 

16 hours ago, Virgil said:


I just checked the trade chart.  If you think that DJ Moore is worth a late first round pick, then it’s fair.  

 

I feel like teams usually have overpay to get into the top 5.  I don’t think Moore would fetch a late first round pick, so it seems like the Panthers paid under value.  
 

With so many teams wanting a QB, I expected more competition

 

Exactly how the Bears valued Moore since they pushed for him over a 2025 1st.

 

 

 

 

57 minutes ago, mannc said:

Disagree.  I think it’s a really nice haul in a year where there’s no great QB prospects.  Excellent move for Chicago.

 

I think its a great move for the Bears and said as much in another post. I was just surprised at the compensation after a couple of crazy years of big hauls to move up. I'm thinking like what Philly gave up to get Wentz, Rams to get Goff, type of deals. To get up to #1, I expected a big pile of 1sts and 2nds. But good for both teams. Chicago gets a great WR for Fields and a handful of decent picks to work with. Better than just that #1 overall in a weak draft. :thumbsup:

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Airseven said:


I like the trade for both teams.

 

Panthers could still trade down (Indy?), recoup assets (‘24 1st?), and still get a top 3 QB if they aren’t enamored with Stroud. Essentially it’d be a means to move into the top 4 for a top 3 QB prospect and not having to be without a 1st next year.

There is absolutely no way they trade out of that spot now they are there. You need a QB. Whether you get the wrong or right one @ 4/5/6/7 etc. is at the decision of other teams and how the draft falls. 
 

They are guaranteed to have the pick for franchise QB in their own control. 
 

If, idiotically, they trade out of that just for assets then why trade to 1 to begin with just to have a potential crapshoot? You’ve given up one of the few proven “assets” the team actually had in Moore…

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Yup.  If you do the draft pick chart value calculation it would've been close to an even trade without DJ Moore.  The Panthers were desperate and the Bears took advantage.  If Carolina gets a franchise QB though it's a win/win trade.

Yeah, a franchise QB with who to throw to? Dj Moore? Nope. Christian McCaffrey? Nope. They have no 1st or 2nd this year now, no 1st round pick next year, no 2nd round pick the year after, they better have a GM that knows what he's doing because with 2 sides of the team to build, it's gonna be hard without all that draft capital to do things. I personally don't believe giving up 4 draft picks and a premier player for one player. I don't care about what a chart says

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Why is Burrow mentioned in this group?

Successful QB on a rookie contract

Edited by Chaos
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...