Aaron Rodgers talking with the Jets

[The Jokeman]

6 minutes ago, Gregg said:

 

Woody and Chris Johnson = Beavis and Butthead.

Throw in Mark Davis and got the 3 stooges. 

[Albany,n.y.]

2 minutes ago, Gregg said:

 

Woody and Chris Johnson = Beavis and Butthead.

It is extremely poor management to give up a high pick for a 39 year old QB who is a head case.  Throw in Joe Douglas for picking Wilson and after 2 seasons realizing he drafted a bust. 

If the Jets are convinced they blew it on Wilson, a better option would be to package the picks GB wants with something else and move up in the draft & get another QB.  Or they could have signed Carr, Garoppolo or a stopgap for free.  The main problem with the draft would be that the same GM who picked Wilson would be drafting his replacement. 

1 minute ago, The Jokeman said:

Throw in Mark Davis and got the 3 stooges. 

The 3rd stooge is Joe Douglas

[ColoradoBills]

14 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

So the Jets part with their 1st this year (13th?) and a conditional pick for Rodgers. Yet it might be wiser of them to make the 1st in 2014 as one would think with Rodgers they should pick lower than 13 next season, then the Jets not the best run franchise. 

 

No way that GB would wait a year to get their 1st round pick.

[Albany,n.y.]

Another QB possibility: https://www.turfshowtimes.com/2023/3/9/23632548/matthew-stafford-trade-rumors-rams-retirement

[buffblue]

25 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

So the Jets part with their 1st this year (13th?) and a conditional pick for Rodgers. Yet it might be wiser of them to make the 1st in 2014 as one would think with Rodgers they should pick lower than 13 next season, then the Jets not the best run franchise. 

Sure but why would the Packers be ok with getting the Jets pick next year instead of the current one? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense from their perspective, unless they want to have enough ammo in 2024 to take another shot at a qb should Love flop.

[GoBills808]

Just now, ScottLaw said:

I would think that would change post a Rodgers to Jets trade… which is what I was replying to. 

I doubt it. Those lines likely already account for the Jets making a move at QB, I mean they finished dfl last season and have second best odds rn

 

Rodgers to Jets isn't going to move it that much

[Bob Jones]

35 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

It is extremely poor management to give up a high pick for a 39 year old QB who is a head case.

What ever do you mean? AR seems to be very intelligent, and when people laughed at him for some things he said over the past 2 1/2 years, he's getting the last laugh now, as he was 100% correct.

[uticaclub]

24 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I doubt it. Those lines likely already account for the Jets making a move at QB, I mean they finished dfl last season and have second best odds rn

 

Rodgers to Jets aren't going to move it that much

The lines are where the money goes, not necessarily what anyone thinks is actually going to happen. If Rodgers signs with the Jets a bunch of money will come in for the Jets and the odds will change.

Edited March 9, 2023 by uticaclub

[Captain Hindsight]

44 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

Another QB possibility: https://www.turfshowtimes.com/2023/3/9/23632548/matthew-stafford-trade-rumors-rams-retirement

Man the Rams went from a Super Bowl winner to doormat extremely quickly 

[Gregg]

LOL Keyshawn Johnson.

 

 

[The Jokeman]

29 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said:

Man the Rams went from a Super Bowl winner to doormat extremely quickly 

Injuries to your best players like Stafford, Kupp, trading away Robert Woods/losing OBJ for an over paid Allen Robinson. Losing Von Miller in free agency. All of these can lead to losing.

[GoBills808]

42 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

The lines are where the money goes, not necessarily what anyone thinks is actually going to happen. If Rodgers signs with the Jets a bunch of money will come in for the Jets and the odds will change.

People usually tend to put money on what they think is going to happen

[BillsShredder83]

5 hours ago, SCBills said:

 

Yea, I'm not overly concerned with Rodgers to the Jets.  I think they're a Super Bowl contender for a year or two with him, but I also think it forces us to really up our game with a threat like that in Division. 

 

My frustration would definitely come with the fact it seems Green Bay just wants him gone.. and in doing so, likely won't demand significant draft compensation. 

well measured take. exactly where im at and most fans should be, imo

[uticaclub]

2 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

People usually tend to put money on what they think is going to happen

Correct, and when Rodgers makes his decision the lines will be effected. 

[WhoTom]

[Gunsgoodtime]

Looks close to a done deal.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/aaron-rodgers-trade-details-between-packers-jets-essentially-done-report

[H2o]

6 minutes ago, Gunsgoodtime said:

Looks close to a done deal.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/aaron-rodgers-trade-details-between-packers-jets-essentially-done-report

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Rodgers is like, "Nope, I think I'll stay here."?

 

 

[Airseven]

On 3/9/2023 at 12:17 PM, Captain Hindsight said:

Man the Rams went from a Super Bowl winner to doormat extremely quickly 

They went all out committing resources for the short-term. And it worked. They’ve earned a couple years to now regroup.

 

It’s an interesting juxtaposition in philosophy as compared to, say, the Patriots and Chiefs.

Edited March 11, 2023 by Airseven

[Airseven]

On 3/9/2023 at 12:34 PM, Gregg said:

LOL Keyshawn Johnson.

 

 

He’s not wrong about the Jets becoming the AFCE favorite. 
 

I wouldn’t trade Allen for Rodgers, obviously, but this would certainly close and latch the Bills 3-year window. It’s probably best for the Bills to take a year to rebuild anyway.

[Gunsgoodtime]

Another report.  Looks like it's just up to Rodgers at this point

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/03/11/jets-packers-aaron-rodgers-trade-report