Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Gregg said:

Charles Robinson on Twitter: "A deal between the #Packers and #Jets to swap Aaron Rodgers for two high draft picks is taking shape. But one lingering hangup is whether the Packers will agree to some draft “give back” protection if Rodgers doesn’t play in the 2024 season. Details: https://t.co/DmpXtuKwf2" / Twitter

The packers should tell the Jets to pound sane. Why should the packers give them protections if he retires? Any player could retire at any time or get injured or suddenly suck.


Why should the trade trading for the contract get any protection? Take the player, and everything that comes with it

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I cannot believe that the jets are going to blow this possibly.  With that huge expenditure for a moody, inconsistent, head case of a quarterback, past his prime, I think the Jets would not be able to compete with the Bills.  As opposed to getting a good quarterback in the draft on a first contract, enabling them to keep growing as a team.

 

Come on Jets, sign Rogers today, and give us a great Easter gift!

 

Or, if it does not work out, try to swing a deal for perennial pro-bowler, Russel Wilson.  He is only 35, so has a lot more left in the tank...

 

Go Green, get er done!

  • Agree 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, Mister Defense said:

I cannot believe that the jets are going to blow this possibly.  With that huge expenditure for a moody, inconsistent, head case of a quarterback, past his prime, I think the Jets would not be able to compete with the Bills.  As opposed to getting a good quarterback in the draft on a first contract, enabling them to keep growing as a team.

 

Come on Jets, sign Rogers today, and give us a great Easter gift!

 

Or, if it does not work out, try to swing a deal for perennial pro-bowler, Russel Wilson.  He is only 35, so has a lot more left in the tank...

 

Go Green, get er done!

 

Sign Lemar, Rodgers and Wilson and have a three way competition, winner takes all!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
On 4/7/2023 at 11:19 AM, Mister Defense said:

I cannot believe that the jets are going to blow this possibly.  With that huge expenditure for a moody, inconsistent, head case of a quarterback, past his prime, I think the Jets would not be able to compete with the Bills.  As opposed to getting a good quarterback in the draft on a first contract, enabling them to keep growing as a team.

 

Come on Jets, sign Rogers today, and give us a great Easter gift!

 

Or, if it does not work out, try to swing a deal for perennial pro-bowler, Russel Wilson.  He is only 35, so has a lot more left in the tank...

 

Go Green, get er done!

The Jets not getting Rodgers after all this would be the most Jets thing ever. 
 

I still don’t why the Packers have to trade him either or settle for value. Give us 2 1st rounders or you don’t get him. And if you don’t want to play A A Ron, enjoy leaving 50+ mil on the table. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

The Jets know Rodgers wants out.  I would offer next to nothing.  Eventually the Packers are going to have to accept the fact that the return will be minimal. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, LabattBlue said:

The Jets know Rodgers wants out.  I would offer next to nothing.  Eventually the Packers are going to have to accept the fact that the return will be minimal. 

 

Then I'd start talking to the 49'ers.

Posted

Rodgers would be better off going to SF. They are a legit Super Bowl contender, and the NFC is the easier conference.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gregg said:

Rodgers would be better off going to SF. They are a legit Super Bowl contender, and the NFC is the easier conference.

Rodgers behing an awesome OL with killer offensive minds, a running game. that team is actually really scary, and Rodgers is from Cali.  this makes a ton more sense. only saving grace is GB might not do an in conference trade like that (although if i was them it wouldnt stop me if they were highest bidder). 

 

GB isnt going to be a contender in the next 2 years Rodgers would play there.

 

If i had to guess id say GB negotiates with SF in hopes to drive up the price and urgency from NY

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Gregg said:

Rodgers would be better off going to SF. They are a legit Super Bowl contender, and the NFC is the easier conference.

If this happens, the Jets would be like this with Zach:

 

hqdefault.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 4/7/2023 at 11:04 AM, Jauronimo said:

What do you think they're talking about at this point? Homemade peyote recipes? 

 

Jest brass (internally): "Will we suck more with him or without him?"

Posted
2 hours ago, LabattBlue said:

The Jets know Rodgers wants out.  I would offer next to nothing.  Eventually the Packers are going to have to accept the fact that the return will be minimal. 

 

The Packers HAVE a starting QB in Jordan Love... the Jets do not.

 

You've got this backwards... because they have Zach Wilson and little else, eventually the Jets will have to accept the fact that they will have to pay the Packers's price. If Rodgers doesn't want to play, he will retire. If the Jets don't get Rodgers, they are SCREWED.

  • Disagree 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...