KC - Frank Clark Released / Chiefs not expected to Tag Orlando Brown

[Zerovoltz]

5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

You mean they didn't have the best O-line in the NFL?

 

 

 

We read that a lot here last year about Tyreek Hill

No.  Absolultely not.  Worst starting pair of OT in the NFL....but played with what is 1st or 2nd best overall set of G-C-G.

[Mr. WEO]

1 minute ago, Zerovoltz said:

No.  Absolultely not.  Worst starting pair of OT in the NFL....but played with what is 1st or 2nd best overall set of G-C-G.

 

wait...this CAN'T BE TRUE!!

[BarleyNY]

16 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

We read that a lot here last year about Tyreek Hill

 

Every team is different every year. KC had to figure out how to win without Hill, but they wouldn’t have won their SB three seasons ago without him. They wouldn’t have won this last one without Clark. That doesn’t mean that they won’t be able to find a way to win without him on next year’s team. 

[NewEra]

2 hours ago, Zerovoltz said:

No.  Absolultely not.  Worst starting pair of OT in the NFL....but played with what is 1st or 2nd best overall set of G-C-G.

This is an exaggeration based on Browns early season poor play. He was bad to start the year but played very well down the stretch and in the playoffs. Both tackles (especially Wylie) played the games of their lives in the Super Bowl.  The “worst starting pair” in the nfl were a huge reason that your boys won the game and held Philly to zero sacks

[foreboding]

13 hours ago, BarleyNY said:

That’s rough. I don’t think KC makes it to the SB without Clark. He was huge in the Cincy game. 

Yup. He took over the end of that game.

[Mr. WEO]

6 hours ago, NewEra said:

This is an exaggeration based on Browns early season poor play. He was bad to start the year but played very well down the stretch and in the playoffs. Both tackles (especially Wylie) played the games of their lives in the Super Bowl.  The “worst starting pair” in the nfl were a huge reason that your boys won the game and held Philly to zero sacks

 

Bengals D had no trouble getting to Mahomes...

[Thurman#1]

18 hours ago, Dablitzkrieg said:

And then signed back at a more team friendly deal

 

 

If that was going to happen, why release him? 

 

This gives everyone a shot at him. Clark won't miss using that to his benefit.

 

16 hours ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

He was on his last year of his contract.  He no doubt wanted longer terms that KC was unwilling to give.

KC is probably smart just saying let's part ways instead of having a disgruntled player on his last year.

Sometimes trying to get a trade is not worth it.  They may get a comp pick for him next draft anyways.

 

 

No comp picks for guys you cut. Contract has to expire.

 

 

Edited March 7, 2023 by Thurman#1

[Thurman#1]

14 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Bringing Justin Houston give him a little bit of a sweetener so that he picks us over another team like the Chiefs. He’s still productive and would fit great into our rotation.

 

 

Yeah, wouldn't mind that at all, if doable.

 

 

[BullBuchanan]

18 hours ago, The Wiz said:

Do you post anything other than "yea but KC won the Superbowl" on this board?

 

Just curious what you might think you are contributing to a topic that has nothing to do with that.

 

Same as the Jackson mahomes thread.

 

 

 

 

 

A conversation about the SB Winner releasing a player seems pretty related to them being a SB winner to me. 🤷‍♂️

[The Wiz]

2 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

A conversation about the SB Winner releasing a player seems pretty related to them being a SB winner to me. 🤷‍♂️

Related sure.  As I stated, that was his only comment and has nothing to do with the players in question within the topic discussion which makes my original question still relevant.