Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Again - if the CULT didn't want to cultivate a specific narrative - they would have given these tapes to ALL media sources.

 

Idiots

 

 

why didn't the dems give the videos out?  if transparency is the goal and joe wants to be the most transparent pres of all time why didn't they release them? 

Posted
1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Wow! You missed the ENTIRE point of his report. The central theme was NOT that what happened was excusable, appropriate or should encouraged. His point was that your government is LYING to you. And….they did! To prove his point he shared specific examples of just that. He was NOT making an overarching finding about the protest. Wake up! 

 

That's how Dems roll.  Unless you say it was an insurrection, you support everything that happened.  Clowns.

 

28 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

why didn't the dems give the videos out?  if transparency is the goal and joe wants to be the most transparent pres of all time why didn't they release them? 

 

It's a question for the ages!

  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

BillSy and multiple accounts.

 

Oh, someone's feelings are hurt I see... lol

 

Can you list my alternative accounts just so that I aware?

 

This should be fun and easy for you to do, right?

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

why didn't the dems give the videos out?  if transparency is the goal and joe wants to be the most transparent pres of all time why didn't they release them? 

 

Please tell us what the January 6 committee didn't show you?

 

1)That there were other people other than Josh Hawley running that day?  Can you share where the Committee said ONLY Josh Hawley was running that day after he riled up the cult?

 

220721-josh-hawley-2up-2x1-v2-ac-956p-79

 

2) QAnon Shaman had his day in court. The DOJ already said that his counsel had access to the same videos that Tucker shared.

 

Tucker: "To this day, there is dispute over how QS got into the Capitol building."

 

Wrong - Here is QS entering the Capitol ~ 40 seconds after the breach. There is no dispute.

 

FqlKRoYXoAQZWgw?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

 

3) WTF are you talking about Biden and transparency. Biden runs the Executive branch; not Legislative

 

Idiots

 

 

Edited by BillStime
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I’m starting to think @Irv is right about BillSy and multiple accounts.  I’m seeing a trend. 
 

What say you B-man? 

 

 

I don't know.

 

It is kind of striking that when new left-leaning posters join, they are usually somewhat reasonable and give real evidence to try and support their views.

 

However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs.

 

Refusing to even read your arguments, dismissing qualified people just out of hand, because its not from their "approved" list of sources,

 

deliberately (?) twisting what you have posted into something else entirely, strawman after strawman to derail threads, and mostly the endless repetition of the same points that have already been disproven.

 

Whether or not it is multiple accounts, they certainly are indistinguishable.

 

 

 

.

  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

I don't know.

 

It is kind of striking that when new left-leaning posters join, they are usually somewhat reasonable and give real evidence to try and support their views.

 

However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs.

 

Refusing to even read your arguments, dismissing qualified people just out of hand, because its not from their "approved" list of sources,

 

deliberately (?) twisting what you have posted into something else entirely, strawman after strawman to derail threads, and mostly the endless repetition of the same points that have already been disproven.

 

Whether or not it is multiple accounts, they certainly are indistinguishable.

 

It's because they can't justify their positions.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, B-Man said:

dismissing qualified people just out of hand

 

👆🤡

 

1) Hilarious, coming from our leading plagiarist.

 

2) Your "qualified" people lost all credibility when you all defended this:

 

giphy.gif

 

3) "However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs."

 

Have you ever thought it might be you and the cult being overly committed to your well-coordinated propaganda campaign?

 

4) The cult has NO problem with these "quality" contributors to forum:

 

@Wacka

@Unforgiven

@AlBUNDY4TDS

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Posted
14 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

👆🤡

 

1) Hilarious, coming from our leading plagiarist.

 

2) Your "qualified" people lost all credibility when you all defended this:

 

giphy.gif

 

3) "However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs."

 

Have you ever thought it might be you and the cult being overly committed to your well-coordinated propaganda campaign?

 

4) The cult has NO problem with these "quality" contributors to forum:

 

@Wacka

@Unforgiven

@AlBUNDY4TDS

 

 

 

 

 

Oh man, billsy is calling me out by name. I finally made it! #winning 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I don't know.

 

It is kind of striking that when new left-leaning posters join, they are usually somewhat reasonable and give real evidence to try and support their views.

 

However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs.

 

Refusing to even read your arguments, dismissing qualified people just out of hand, because its not from their "approved" list of sources,

 

deliberately (?) twisting what you have posted into something else entirely, strawman after strawman to derail threads, and mostly the endless repetition of the same points that have already been disproven.

 

Whether or not it is multiple accounts, they certainly are indistinguishable.

 

 

 

.

Next time, a simple yes or no would do.  All this yammering on, I’ll bet your patients used to pretend to be asleep when you checked in on them.  
 

But ty nonetheless.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

👆🤡

 

1) Hilarious, coming from our leading plagiarist.

 

2) Your "qualified" people lost all credibility when you all defended this:

 

giphy.gif

 

3) "However soon enough they fall into the same category as Billsy and Tibs."

 

Have you ever thought it might be you and the cult being overly committed to your well-coordinated propaganda campaign?

 

4) The cult has NO problem with these "quality" contributors to forum:

 

@Wacka

@Unforgiven

@AlBUNDY4TDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dude - you need to get a life.  Trump hasn't been president for two years.  What?  No beef with Calvin Coolidge?  What a mess.  

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Oh, someone's feelings are hurt I see... lol

 

Can you list my alternative accounts just so that I aware?

 

This should be fun and easy for you to do, right?

 

The fun here was in setting the bait and dropping the line in the water. 
 

Word to the wise: when someone tells you someone else wrote “gullible” on the ceiling, don’t look up!  My son got me on that one when he was in elementary school. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

Dude.  You're running scared.  I already told you.  Nikki Haley gets the nomination.  Quit soiling yourself about orange man.  What a mess.  

 

image.png.baa7b365aef5eee9a94364ba1374f7d7.png

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The fun here was in setting the bait and dropping the line in the water. 
 

Word to the wise: when someone tells you someone else wrote “gullible” on the ceiling, don’t look up!  My son got me on that one when he was in elementary school. 

 

Here we go again - this clown turning himself inside out because like @Irv - he can't back up his billshit.

 

Really should be easy to share identify my alleged sock puppets.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Here’s what we know:

  • Some people acted very badly. A handful came ready for a fight while others admit they were caught up in a mob mentality that unfolded over the course of the afternoon.
  • The overwhelming majority of protesters did not act badly or violently. Not only do security footage and other video sources demonstrate that is indeed true, the Justice Department’s own data supports it. “Parading” in the Capitol, a class B misdemeanor, is by far the most common charge in the Justice Department’s sweeping investigation. According to an update published this week, 919 out of 1,000 defendants face trespassing charges. Of the 518 who accepted plea agreements, 385 pleaded guilty to misdemeanors and 133 pleaded guilty to a felony.
  • The most common felony is not “insurrection” but rather obstruction of an official proceeding. Fewer than 20 people face seditious conspiracy charges.
  • Roughly 100 defendants are accused of attacking police officers with a dangerous weapon. No one is charged with carrying or using a firearm inside the building.
  • Speaking of police, body-worn camera and independent video show outrageous misconduct by law enforcement. D.C. Metropolitan Police launched an aggressive and unnecessary offensive against the crowd assembled on the west lawn. Even though protesters were respecting police lines at the time, footage shows officers throwing stun grenades into and other devices containing rubber bullets into the crowd beginning shortly after 1:00 p.m.
  • Video and testimony by Capitol police officers at trial confirmed how that activity enraged the crowd. Other officers shoved women down stairs and shoved one man off the upper terrace balcony.
  • This conduct continued inside the building. Some officers shoved and hit individuals inside the Rotunda and other areas. A brutal scene in the lower west terrace tunnel unfolded as police used their batons to beat at least two women on the head resulting in bleeding and injuries.
  • Excessive force caused the deaths of four Trump supporters: Ashli Babbitt, Rosanne Boyland, Kevin Greeson, and Benjamin Phillips.
  • On the flip side, despite persistent claims even by Attorney General Merrick Garland and White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre as recently as this week, no police officers died as a result of injuries sustained on January 6. Officer Brian Sicknick is on video walking around after he suffered a pepper spray attack; he died of a stroke the next day. There’s no evidence the reported suicides of other officers after January 6 were related to the protest.
  • Further, the responsibility of sufficiently protecting the Capitol with enough officers fell to the Capitol Police board—staffed by the sergeant-at-arms for then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund repeatedly testified that he requested additional help including National Guardsmen days before January 6. Even as the chaos unfolded that day, House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger delayed pursuing the proper authorization of the National Guard.
  • Irving told House Republicans that his staff as well as members of the House Administration committee began planning for January 6 weeks before the protest. Jamie Fleet, a security staffer for both Pelosi and the committee overseeing Capitol functions, told the January 6 select committee that he started preparations for January 6 in the summer of 2020.
  • When the building was breached at around 2:15 p.m., Congress was not voting to certify the electoral college results at the time, a common misperception. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Arizona) were in the process of disputing the election outcome in Gosar’s home state, a process permitted under the Electoral Count Act. The joint session of Congress technically had been adjourned an hour earlier so debate could begin.
  • For all the wasted energy spent over the past two years that democracy almost died on January 6, the chaotic protest only delayed the certification ceremony for seven hours. Joe Biden officially was declared president at 3:00 a.m. the next day.
  • The surveillance video viewed by Carlson’s team has not been made available to defense attorneys, arguably in violation of defendants’ constitutional rights.
  • A separate trove of tapes that captured activity from the hours between noon and 8:00 p.m. was turned over to the FBI in early 2021 to use in its investigation. With few exceptions, all footage remains under protective orders. Defense attorneys consistently have complained that access to the full archive is constrained by the protective orders.

Plenty of other falsehoods and misrepresentations animate the fable of January 6. But for those honestly seeking the truth, consider this a cheat sheet for future use.

 

https://amgreatness.com/2023/03/09/a-handy-january-6-fact-sheet/

Sure exactly what I saw happen as it occurred live.  And how McCarthy described it.

Politely, this is willful ignorance.  Impolitely, LYING!

Good Lord, what is wrong with you people defending these POS'es.

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Here we go again - this clown turning himself inside out because like @Irv - he can't back up his billshit.

 

Really should be easy to share identify my alleged sock puppets.

 

 

I am not going to share identify alleged sock puppets easy or don’t. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Here we go again - this clown turning himself inside out because like @Irv - he can't back up his billshit.

 

Really should be easy to share identify my alleged sock puppets.

 

 

When do you switch to the other screen names?  Was für ein Chaos!

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
4 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Again - if the CULT didn't want to cultivate a specific narrative - they would have given these tapes to ALL media sources.

 

Idiots

 

It already was on ALL media sources. The committee hearing was on EVERY network in prime time….or were you not allowed to watch TV in the asylum?

  • Haha (+1) 3
×
×
  • Create New...