Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Which part?


Libs of Tik Toc know their audience - they knew you would take their tweet at face value and not look into the two very different cases.


Your boy Joe Biggs did a whole lot more than knock down a fence.

 

Seditious Conspiracy.

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, BillStime said:


Libs of Tik Toc know their audience - they knew you would take their tweet at face value and not look into the two very different cases.


Your boy Joe Biggs did a whole lot more than knock down a fence.

 

Seditious Conspiracy.

 

 

 

 


500 bucks for committing arson…is that an appropriate punishment? 

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:


No but that’s not the purpose of the tweet. 
 

 

Purpose of the tweet is one side received zero punishment one got 17 years. You realize that’s a significant difference don’t you?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Purpose of the tweet is one side received zero punishment one got 17 years. You realize that’s a significant difference don’t you?


You clearly didn’t look into Biggs.

Posted
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:


You clearly didn’t look into Biggs.

 Nobody is saying he deserved no jail time. The point is they deserve more than a 500 dollar fine. That’s the point

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, aristocrat said:

 Nobody is saying he deserved no jail time. The point is they deserve more than a 500 dollar fine. That’s the point


Nope - the point of the tweet was to keep you engaged and enraged.

Posted
19 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Nope - the point of the tweet was to keep you engaged and enraged.

In your opinion what punishment should the arsonists have received?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

In your opinion what punishment should the arsonists have received?


I have no idea… a few years and forced to pay damages?
 

How much time do you think they should have gotten? 

And how much time should Joe Biggs have gotten?

 

 

Posted

 

 

 

Former Capitol Police Officer Blows J6 Narrative Wide Open With Release of New Audio 

— by Jeff Charles 

 

The audio backs up criticism against the Capitol Police that it failed to take decisive action on Jan. 6 despite having been warned about potential violence previously. He also called out Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger for opposing the release of the J6 footage and using non-disclosure agreements to keep officers silent.

 

This release introduces another dimension to the discourse surrounding J6. Johnson’s former position as a police officer gives him a perspective that those interested in weaponizing the incident against their political opposition would not want anyone to hear.

 

There is a reason why the anti-Trump House Select Jan. 6 Committee would not bother to take testimony from Johnson.

 

https://redstate.com/jeffc/2023/12/04/former-capitol-police-officer-blows-j6-narrative-wide-open-with-release-of-new-audio-n2167159

 

.

  • Shocked 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Oh.

 

BTW, remember when the King engaged in a bet with me that all the J6 transcripts would be released by the end of September 2022 and then reneged on it?

 

 

 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Shocked 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

He posted a tweet at 2:38 PM that told people to "stay peaceful."  That was 26 minutes after the Capitol was breached.  Obviously no one was paying attention to him.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 3 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...