The Unreleased J6 Capitol Surveillance Tapes: As Expected Tapes CONFIRM Sham J6 Committee LIED.

[All_Pro_Bills]

4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

and there you have what?  a conspiracy to castrate violent losers who are blind with rage at their status as supposed victims??  Not a winning election strategy...

Using a friendly district court venue and referring all the cases to the court of a judge that shares the politics of the prosecution that will ensure that every defendant is found guilty is the part not too many understand.  Apparently, you don't understand that either. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

Do you remember the mood of the country when this happened ?  America rallies around winners, not losers.  The mood on Jan 6?  Which mood would you prefer for our country?  I'll take the one generated by a bunch of kids that averaged 22 yo. and mostly went on to highly successful, productive careers.

 

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

8 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Yikes. You’re completely lost. 

@L Ron Burgundy is an extremist that doesn’t know he is, nor does he understand his role here.  In the big picture, he’s likely easily manipulated and emotional.  Context becomes irrelevant because emotion precedes reason.   
 

Through day one, Tucker Carlson and by extension Kevin McCarthy have revealed no national secrets, no special secret entrances, but certainly reveal a different story on the Shaman than painted in the media and 1/6 committee.   Yet, the screams are that citizens merely revealing the footage is dangerous for us all.  
 

Democracy dies in darkness, but these folks are comfortable keeping the lights off, the shades down, and believing what they are told without question. 

 

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

different story on the Shaman than painted in the media and 1/6 committee

do you believe that the violence at the barricades allowed this misfit, miscreant to enter the building?

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[T master]

It was all part of the narrative more than likely Pelosi had her dirty little hands in it she was some part of the security detail for the capital if i seem to remember it being talked about . I wouldn't put anything past any political group to get something like a so called riot against the capital to look as such  .

 

 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

2 minutes ago, T master said:

It was all part of the narrative more than likely Pelosi had her dirty little hands in it she was some part of the security detail for the capital if i seem to remember it being talked about . I wouldn't put anything past any political group to get something like a so called riot against the capital to look as such  .

 

 

sure.  Do you believe traitor tucker will prove that for you?

[All_Pro_Bills]

23 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

do you believe that the violence at the barricades allowed this misfit, miscreant to enter the building?

We're past the point of "believe".  The video shows police cordially escorting this goof ball through the building past numerous officers any of which could have arrested or stopped him.  That seems illogical and makes no sense when trying to reconcile it against the official story.  I mean truly, how can you not have any doubts about the committee's narrative?     

[Joe Ferguson forever]

5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

We're past the point of "believe".  The video shows police cordially escorting this goof ball through the building past numerous officers any of which could have arrested or stopped him.  That seems illogical and makes no sense when trying to reconcile it against the official story.  I mean truly, how can you not have any doubts about the committee's narrative?     

I have no doubt that the committee wanted to portray a violent insurrection, which it was.  The timeline is vital here.  The walking around the building occurred after a mob had beaten law enforcement with trump and confederate flag poles, right?  Many dressed in military uniforms.  "Kill pence and Pelosi" was being chanted.  The breach had already taken place and apparently the cavalry wasn't coming soon.  I suspect some ######ed misfit wasn't their highest priority...

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillStime]

40 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

@L Ron Burgundy is an extremist that doesn’t know he is, nor does he understand his role here.  In the big picture, he’s likely easily manipulated and emotional.  Context becomes irrelevant because emotion precedes reason.   
 

Through day one, Tucker Carlson and by extension Kevin McCarthy have revealed no national secrets, no special secret entrances, but certainly reveal a different story on the Shaman than painted in the media and 1/6 committee.   Yet, the screams are that citizens merely revealing the footage is dangerous for us all.  
 

Democracy dies in darkness, but these folks are comfortable keeping the lights off, the shades down, and believing what they are told without question. 

 

 

 

Irony is dead 

[BillsFanNC]

11 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

We're past the point of "believe".  The video shows police cordially escorting this goof ball through the building past numerous officers any of which could have arrested or stopped him.  That seems illogical and makes no sense when trying to reconcile it against the official story.  I mean truly, how can you not have any doubts about the committee's narrative?     

 

Because he/she/they are a partisan hack and therefore will continue believing the fairytales that his/her/their masters demand of him/her/them.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Because he/she/they are a partisan hack and therefore will continue believing the fairytales that his/her/their masters demand of him/her/them.

Now irony is buried...

[BillsFanNC]

More lies to cover lies to cover lies?

 

Im shocked.

 

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

38 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

do you believe that the violence at the barricades allowed this misfit, miscreant to enter the building?

This is a perfect example of emotion overruling reason.  
 

I simply offered that the footage reveals a different narrative of this guy than that we, as citizens, were spoon fed.  We were further advised that the release of this sort of footage was so dangerous that it should be forever withheld from the public forum. 
 

Your response is about violence at the blockades.  
 

My posting history on 1/6 is pretty clear since 1/6.  These “miscreants”—that is, non-peaceful protestors—- do not reflect my values, do not represent me or my views.  I see the worst offenders as those very similar to the worst offenders in the BLM riots.   

 

Propaganda is propaganda, Red, even when you like the version being pushed.  

[nedboy7]

Tucker got jealous and made his own version of 2000 Mules I see. 

[Joe Ferguson forever]

11 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I see the worst offenders as those very similar to the worst offenders in the BLM riots.   

We have found common ground, Lenny!  Do you feel the word "miscreant" is too strong?  I could add a few others...Do you feel the "Miracle on Ice" video is propaganda?  were the miscreants insurrectionists?

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[All_Pro_Bills]

36 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I have no doubt that the committee wanted to portray a violent insurrection, which it was.  The timeline is vital here.  The walking around the building occurred after a mob had beaten law enforcement with trump and confederate flag poles, right?  Many dressed in military uniforms.  "Kill pence and Pelosi" was being chanted.  The breach had already taken place and apparently the cavalry wasn't coming soon.  I suspect some ######ed misfit wasn't their highest priority...

I don't have a clear understanding of the time line.  But your highest priority argument makes no sense to me. 

 

Any police officer acting in the line of duty would take the easy opportunity to neutralize a genuine threat in close proximity regardless of priorities.  Simply for no other reason than the treat was an easy target of opportunity to neutralize.  Instead officers commit time and limited personnel to provide a guided tour to a low priority instead of leaving the suspect alone and tending to what you suggest are higher priories that had police outnumbered like actual rioters.  I think you're reaching here rather than being willing to admit that a serious inspection of the official story is required given some of the contradictions the video suggests. 

Edited March 7, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills

[Joe Ferguson forever]

8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I don't have a clear understanding of the time line.  But your highest priority argument makes no sense to me. 

 

Any police officer acting in the line of duty would take the easy opportunity to neutralize a genuine threat in close proximity regardless of priorities.  Simply for no other reason than the treat was an easy target of opportunity to neutralize.  Instead officers commit time and limited personnel to provide a guided tour to a low priority instead of leaving the suspect alone and tending to what you suggest are higher priories that had police outnumbered like actual rioters.  I think you're reaching here rather than being willing to admit that a serious inspection of the official story is required given some of the contradictions the video suggests. 

I suspect there were dirty Capitol police involved in this that were enlisted prior to Jan 6 (by the bad guys).  Hopefully, we'll find out.  But putting myself in the good cops shoes, I likely wouldn't want to spark more violence inside the capitol while a mob of scumbags were trying to find and murder a sitting vice prez and Speaker of the House.

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[wnyguy]

You just can't argue with these people despite visual evidence before their very eyes. I simply can't understand how they can cling to their disproven point of view. We have a large number of patriotic Americans behind bars for years on what should be a simple trespassing charge. It's simply wrong.

[Joe Ferguson forever]

7 minutes ago, wnyguy said:

You just can't argue with these people despite visual evidence before their very eyes. I simply can't understand how they can cling to their disproven point of view. We have a large number of patriotic Americans behind bars for years on what should be a simple trespassing charge. It's simply wrong.

yes, because no law enforcement officers were injured or beaten with MAGA aligned flag poles and bear spray.  And I thought y'all supported law and order....stupid me.  Oh, yeah and the Ukrainians started the war with Russia.

Edited March 7, 2023 by redtail hawk

[BillsFanNC]

🎯

 

Don't you think it's well past time to put all these clowns on ignore?

 

In the face of clear video evidence that condradicts the two year narrative weve been told over and over,  they refuse to budge. They have zero intellectual honesty.

 

 

 

Edited March 7, 2023 by BillsFanNC