Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

As Tucker himself said, most of the footage he’s shown (hand-picked from over 400 hours, just as the Jan 6 Committee hand-picked its release footage) shows “mostly peaceful chaos.” “Mostly peaceful” — the exact terminology ridiculed by the Right when it was used in conjunction with the BLM post-George Floyd protests. It was stupid to use that terminology then; it’s stupid to use it now. If I’m any group of 1,000 protesters just 10% are behaving violently, who cares what the 90% are doing? It’s still 100 rioters. 

So arrest, charge, try, and convict the 100 but the problem with your argument in practice with J6 is that the 90% that were arrested and charged did not riot or commit any acts of violence.  Yet many sit in jail without bail without due process for almost 2 years only to be tried for minor trespass offenses.  And to top it off, video evidence suggests many were invited into the building.  So how is that even tresspass?  

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Keep telling yourself that and watch the history books document you as a fool

What the history books will show is in the people working inside the building were the threat to democracy rather than the people protesting outside.  You will be the fool.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What the history books will show is in the people working inside the building were the threat to democracy rather than the people protesting outside.  You will be the fool.

 

deranged af - holy $#it

  • Agree 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Yet many sit in jail without bail without due process for almost 2 years only to be tried for minor trespass offenses. 

Who “sits in jail” awaiting charges on “minor trespass offenses?” Everyone I’ve seen take a plea or get convicted was out on bail. 
You folks have a serious persecution complex. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

You folks have a serious persecution complex. 

Abso-efin-lutely.  And they need a common enemy to hate and rail against.  Now, it seems it's everyone but fellow MAGA's despite the diversity of that very large group.  It's pretty pathetic.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted

Who was the most ardent supporter of the J6 committee here at PPP?

 

Who constantly reminded us about their mission that was laser focused on the truth by getting all that testimony under oath?

 

That would be @ChiGoose

 

I wonder why he's been missing lately?

 

:lol:

Posted
49 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

As Tucker himself said, most of the footage he’s shown (hand-picked from over 400 hours, just as the Jan 6 Committee hand-picked its release footage) shows “mostly peaceful chaos.” “Mostly peaceful” — the exact terminology ridiculed by the Right when it was used in conjunction with the BLM post-George Floyd protests. It was stupid to use that terminology then; it’s stupid to use it now. If I’m any group of 1,000 protesters just 10% are behaving violently, who cares what the 90% are doing? It’s still 100 rioters. 

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative. 

really?  How do you interpret "mostly peaceful"?  Sounds like absolution to me.

Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative. 

I don’t know about you, but for me: when there’s a riot going on, when people are breaking windows, climbing walls, trashing stuff, burning cars, etc, I usually consider the images of such destruction to be newsworthy, while the images of others just standing around to be the stuff that’s left on the cutting room floor.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Who “sits in jail” awaiting charges on “minor trespass offenses?” Everyone I’ve seen take a plea or get convicted was out on bail. 
You folks have a serious persecution complex. 

 

So the shaman guy was denied bail and sentenced to 5 years in prison. Was never violent and walked around the Capitol. He was denied bail.  Why no bail?  BLM protesters were literally bailed out by the current vp with a fund her employees started.  You wanna deny bail for the violent people have at it but if we're gonna treat everyone equally why not let peaceful people out on bail?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

I don’t know about you, but for me: when there’s a riot going on, when people are breaking windows, climbing walls, trashing stuff, burning cars, etc, I usually consider the images of such destruction to be newsworthy, while the images of others just standing around to be the stuff that’s left on the cutting room floor.

As I mentioned yesterday the most compelling video was that of the congressman running from the chamber. That was clearly edited to show something that was the complete OPPOSITE of what the actual footage showed. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative. 


They conveniently ignore that part. To them, unless you continue to believe it was an insurrection, it means you support what happened.  :rolleyes: 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

As I mentioned yesterday the most compelling video was that of the congressman running from the chamber. That was clearly edited to show something that was the complete OPPOSITE of what the actual footage showed. 

 

We must remember who we are dealing with here as we've watched leftists melt down over the past two days about TC and the tapes.

 

These are the very same people who will tell you that Trump called neo nazis in Charlottesville "very fine people" when we have clear and distinct video and audio proof that he explicitly excluded neo nazis and white nationalists from that characterization.

 

These are also the same people who will tell you that Trump instructed his followers on J6 to carry out an insurrection at the Capitol when there is clear and distinct video and audio proof that the only directions he gave that day was for people to go to the Capitol, where a legal permit for another rally existed, to "peacefully and patriotically" make their voices heard.

 

In other words these people have had their ability to make basic accurate observations, such that it ever existed in the first place, completely obliterated. 

 

The sky is  green in their TDS world.

 

So now we come to TC and the video shared on his show that literally proves that the J6 committee lied to the public. 

 

In their green sky world of course this is all only about TC bad.

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

"very fine people"


He did

 

12 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

"peacefully and patriotically"


He did.
 

He also used the word ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times that day - including:

 

"If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore."
 

17 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

In other words these people have had their ability to make basic accurate observations, such that it ever existed in the first place, completely obliterated. 


And the cult told us this never happened:

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7779fb77bcb2b72e937
 

Posted

We honestly didn’t even need TC releasing footage to know what happened that day … all he’s doing is putting it into the mainstream for non-hyper political Americans to become aware of.  
 

J6 was used, manipulated, and weaponized, to demonize Trump supporters and as an attempt to prevent Trump from ever running/becoming President again. 
 

Capitol police and those in Washington were aware of what could happen.  “Agitators” in the crowd helped it happen.  ….and away we go. 
 

I don’t want Trump to run for President.  He’s not my guy.  But I know what he represents to the establishment….  and that’s why we saw what we saw emanate from every corner of the political spectrum/media when the uniparty lost control of the narrative two nights ago.  

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, BillStime said:


He did

 


He did.
 

He also used the word ‘fight’ or ‘fighting’ 20 times that day - including:

 

"If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore."
 


And the cult told us this never happened:

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7779fb77bcb2b72e937
 

Keep it up! You prove you’re wrong with each new post. 

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...