Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

I’m not sure that accountability is coming, but there’s always hope. 
 

But, if General Flynn and his team can get some eyes on some of the corruption he claims to have been victimized by, good for him. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 3
Posted

 

 

General Michael Flynn is a retired United States Army lieutenant general who was the 24th U.S. National Security Advisor for the first 22 days of the Trump administration. General Flynn, a staunch Trump ally and confidante, was forced to resign in 2017 following screaming reports that he had lied regarding conversations with Sergey Kislyak, a Russian diplomat.  This was while the Democrat Party and highest levels of US intelligence concocted an attempted coup to take down the sitting President based on what they knew was fraudulent accusations that Trump was Vladimir Putin’s stooge.  General Michael Flynn was collateral damage.  They had to remove him to get to Trump.

 

 

General Michael Flynn was a huge target of Barack Obama, Democrats, the Deep State, and crooked Judge Sullivan, after he joined with Donald Trump during his 2016 campaign for president.  Obama particularly hated Flynn for pointing out the obvious during congressional testimony, that Antifa was sweeping across Syria-Iraq and Obama had no plan to prevent this.

 

 

After he was set up and removed from White House, Flynn was persecuted by lawless Judge Emmet Sullivan in a case that was dropped by the DOJ.  But for months afterward, Judge Sullivan refused to dismiss the case.  For some reason, this crooked leftist judge decided to pursue the charges himself knowing there was nothing there.  President Trump eventually pardoned General Michael Flynn after the system persecuted him and failed him.

 

 

Since that time, the American public learned through court proceedings that charges should never have been filed against General Flynn.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/just-out-general-michael-flynn-sues-doj-fbi-and-sco-for-politically-targeting-him-through-government-agents/

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

This lawsuit likely will go nowhere but he should be able to grift a good amount of money off it it, which is likely the goal. 

Him pleading Guilty is probably not going to look great in it. Also the fact that the legal process didn't actually result in him having the charges dropped and him going free, he had to have his buddy pardon him, not a great look either.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Him pleading Guilty is probably not going to look great in it. Also the fact that the legal process didn't actually result in him having the charges dropped and him going free, he had to have his buddy pardon him, not a great look either.

It’s critical to tell a good story, establish a good narrative, and get some sympathetic people to listen to you.

 

The upper echelon of the FBI certainly appeared to target him,  and as they say, if there’s nothing to worry or be ashamed of, nothing to see here.   

Posted
2 hours ago, Warcodered said:

Him pleading Guilty is probably not going to look great in it. Also the fact that the legal process didn't actually result in him having the charges dropped and him going free, he had to have his buddy pardon him, not a great look either.


Malicious prosecution cases are next to impossible to win and the facts here are really tough for Flynn.

 

Very little chance of a victory in the legal arena, but that’s clearly not the purpose of this filing. 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

😂😂😂😂😂😂 I guess the “stop the steal” grift well has dried up, huh? 
 

is this what he’s doing in between “baptizing” lonely white trash into his little cult?

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

😂😂😂😂😂😂 I guess the “stop the steal” grift well has dried up, huh? 
 

is this what he’s doing in between “baptizing” lonely white trash into his little cult?

The fact anyone supports this loon makes anything they say, on this board or in life, suspect.   This guy is the new leader of qanon.   He is certifiably nuts.  He riles up the dregs of our nation with pure lies and fairy tales.   

 

There are no good conservative posters on this board.   It's fn sad.  The occasional good insight from them quickly gets drowned out by something insane.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

General Michael Flynn is a retired United States Army lieutenant general who was the 24th U.S. National Security Advisor for the first 22 days of the Trump administration. General Flynn, a staunch Trump ally and confidante, was forced to resign in 2017 following screaming reports that he had lied regarding conversations with Sergey Kislyak, a Russian diplomat.  This was while the Democrat Party and highest levels of US intelligence concocted an attempted coup to take down the sitting President based on what they knew was fraudulent accusations that Trump was Vladimir Putin’s stooge.  General Michael Flynn was collateral damage.  They had to remove him to get to Trump.

 

 

General Michael Flynn was a huge target of Barack Obama, Democrats, the Deep State, and crooked Judge Sullivan, after he joined with Donald Trump during his 2016 campaign for president.  Obama particularly hated Flynn for pointing out the obvious during congressional testimony, that Antifa was sweeping across Syria-Iraq and Obama had no plan to prevent this.

 

 

After he was set up and removed from White House, Flynn was persecuted by lawless Judge Emmet Sullivan in a case that was dropped by the DOJ.  But for months afterward, Judge Sullivan refused to dismiss the case.  For some reason, this crooked leftist judge decided to pursue the charges himself knowing there was nothing there.  President Trump eventually pardoned General Michael Flynn after the system persecuted him and failed him.

 

 

Since that time, the American public learned through court proceedings that charges should never have been filed against General Flynn.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/just-out-general-michael-flynn-sues-doj-fbi-and-sco-for-politically-targeting-him-through-government-agents/

Must you cite disreputable sources and known liars so frequently?

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2021/07/29/gateway-pundit-election-vaccine-covid-misinformation-google/?sh=1e8f712e6f14

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

 

 

42 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

 

 

I didn't .

 

Jim Hoft is a very reputable source.

 

 

 

Added:

 

That you frequently search for one or two Leftist sources that want to dismiss conservative sites with an all too apparent spin is YOUR ISSUE, not mine.

 

I found a representative of Hawk for the rest of the board.

 

It fits his posting style perfectly.

 

(Fake MODERATE)

 

FqYqzrRWIAEg9K8?format=png&name=small

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

The fact anyone supports this loon makes anything they say, on this board or in life, suspect.   This guy is the new leader of qanon.   He is certifiably nuts.  He riles up the dregs of our nation with pure lies and fairy tales.   

 

There are no good conservative posters on this board.   It's fn sad.  The occasional good insight from them quickly gets drowned out by something insane.

 

It’s funny, maybe, but I feel the same about virtually every liberal poster here.  Not necessarily the insane part, though a couple come to mind there, but on the general weakness of their positions to one of the great questions of our time. 
 

I’ll ask you since you’ve boldly stepped forward with a clinical diagnosis.  
 

Why were liberals comfortable with Democrat leaders declaring Trump was illegitimately elected in 2016, that some had documented evidence of treasonous behavior, and cast major, serious doubt about the safety and security of our election when nothing of the sort was eve le proven? 

The narrative was completely false.  100% completely made up.  

 

So far, virtually every person I have asked this have passed on answering.  @nedboy7 didn’t share thoughts on Illegitimate elections of 2016,  but as I recall, did suggest that Trump’s actions on 1/6 qualified as treasonous.  @redtail hawk  did opine that no one paid any attention to that stuff, as I recall, which in the context of a completely legitimate election, is mad-azzed crazy conspiracy stuff designed to mislead their base.  It worked well. 
 

What say you, LaRon? 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

I didn't .

 

Jim Hoft is a very reputable source.

 

 

 

Added:

 

That you frequently search for one or two Leftist sources that want to dismiss conservative sites with an all too apparent spin is YOUR ISSUE, not mine.

 

I found a representative of Hawk for the rest of the board.

 

It fits his posting style perfectly.

 

(Fake MODERATE)

 

FqYqzrRWIAEg9K8?format=png&name=small

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

must you so frequently post stupid, inapplicable, inane

memes?  As a nurse, you must be familiar with multi tasking.  I was in conference the last 2 days and posted when it wasn't interesting or in break.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It’s funny, maybe, but I feel the same about virtually every liberal poster here.  Not necessarily the insane part, though a couple come to mind there, but on the general weakness of their positions to one of the great questions of our time. 
 

I’ll ask you since you’ve boldly stepped forward with a clinical diagnosis.  
 

Why were liberals comfortable with Democrat leaders declaring Trump was illegitimately elected in 2016, that some had documented evidence of treasonous behavior, and cast major, serious doubt about the safety and security of our election when nothing of the sort was eve le proven? 

The narrative was completely false.  100% completely made up.  

 

So far, virtually every person I have asked this have passed on answering.  @nedboy7 didn’t share thoughts on Illegitimate elections of 2016,  but as I recall, did suggest that Trump’s actions on 1/6 qualified as treasonous.  @redtail hawk  did opine that no one paid any attention to that stuff, as I recall, which in the context of a completely legitimate election, is mad-azzed crazy conspiracy stuff designed to mislead their base.  It worked well. 
 

What say you, LaRon? 

I say who cares?  It didn't break our brains for years and try to overturn an election.  

 

I say Russia is always interfering,  that isn't new and you saying it was made up doesn't make it true.  And if the Trump campaign hadn't lied repeatedly maybe those liberals wouldn't have spoken somewhat unresponsibly.   

 

I say it's a weak attempt to defend scum.  Scum that are now going to shout fraud about every loss they can't accept.

 

I say it's L Ron not Laron.   Mocking L Ron Hubbard man help me out.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
4 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

The fact anyone supports this loon makes anything they say, on this board or in life, suspect.   This guy is the new leader of qanon.   He is certifiably nuts.  He riles up the dregs of our nation with pure lies and fairy tales.   

 

There are no good conservative posters on this board.   It's fn sad.  The occasional good insight from them quickly gets drowned out by something insane.

 


I don’t even know if he’s nuts, I think he’s taking advantage of very lonely, unwell people for money. 
 

Same cloth as Ron “I’m Totally Not Q” Wadkins. Dude grifted tons of money for his senate run, then fled town and came in dead last in the primary. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


I don’t even know if he’s nuts, I think he’s taking advantage of very lonely, unwell people for money. 
 

Same cloth as Ron “I’m Totally Not Q” Wadkins. Dude grifted tons of money for his senate run, then fled town and came in dead last in the primary. 

I've had that thought.   I go back and forth. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...