Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

 

We scored 10 points.  So... maybe it was a total team collapse?

It was a total team collapse.  But it was also ANOTHER example of an elite QB and powerful offense having their way with a Frazier coached defense in the playoffs.

 

Had the defense played lights out maybe we win that game 16 - 13.  But it didn't.  In fact at key points in that game - at the start and after both Bills scores - the defense went to sleep and allowed long time consuming scoring drives to happen.

 

And for the record the offense played lights out in BOTH of last years playoff games and yet we went 1 - 1 thanks to the defense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, PBF81 said:

 

Game plan?  LOL 

 

Was there a game plan?  Seriously.  

 

"Alright men, we know they're gonna score, let's at least make it look reasonable.  Just don't let 'em score a TD on every play, try and keep 'em under 10 yards-per-play.  Let 'em catch the ball and give 'em a good cushion, let's be good sports in the interests of character, let's help 'em feel accomplished.  We'll lure them into a sense of overconfidence and then Josh will outscore them.  Now go get 'em!". 

 

They didn't even want to adjust their gameplan. Mc Dermot said in an interview that week that he was surprised they had to go back and tweak anything at all... it's on one of the interviews... when I heard that I was like oh gosh...

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

But rarely against superior offenses.  Frazier's defenses could shut down average to weak offenses to a degree that seldom happens in the current NFL.  Hence the high regular season rankings.  But against the top QB's & offenses, particularly in the playoffs, the story was not the same.

 

For sure Frazier had Jackson & the Ravens figured out and he gets an A+ for that.  Otherwise the failings of his defense at key points against top offenses was a recurring theme.

 

 

Even the best defenses in football very rarely now "shut down" superior offenses. It is just not the game anymore. The Bills are hardly alone in that. San Francisco were the #1 defense in football this year. Gave up 31 to the Eagles in the playoffs (and could have been more had Philly needed to score again). The Eagles #2 defense gave up 38 in the Superbowl (okay a scoop and score in there, but counter that with the Chiefs kneeled away a certain TD at the end). You can't win the Superbowl shutting down top offenses now. You might have one game in a post season where you do it... might. But to make a deep post season run you are going to have to win on offense. 

 

Which does get us to the point where you and I have a note of agreement. The Bills need to both allocate more resources to their offense and do a better job of talent evaluation on offense (on the line in particular). Because even the top defenses in football, when faced with the top offenses, are going to give up 30 more often than not. You gotta win on offense. 

 

It is also why blaming the defense for Cincy and giving the atrocious offensive display a pass won't wash. The Bills are going nowhere in the playoffs whoever the coach is, whatever the defense does, if they can't execute better offensively. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Sharky7337 said:

They didn't even want to adjust their gameplan. Mc Dermot said in an interview that week that he was surprised they had to go back and tweak anything at all... it's on one of the interviews... when I heard that I was like oh gosh...

 

McD says almost nothing in most of his pressers.  He's not forthcoming, even with this Frasier thing.  Did Frasier's contract end and not renewed?  I mean who in this league gets to decide to step away from a Coordinator position for what essentially amounts to a sabatical?  I've never heard of this.  

 

"We'll have to watch the video and adjust."  Sure Sean.  

 

We don't even adjust to our own reasons for success on the field in any given game.  "Hey, the run's working great."  ... "Yeah, let's abandon that and let Josh do everything again."  

 

Everything seems shrouded in mystery with this team.  It's the least forthcoming with information for the paying fans side of the business (or media part of the business) that I ever recall at OBD.  I mean we've had coaches that probably should have shut up during their pressers but didn't.  We can't get anything at all from these guys.  

 

I don't see this lack of communication ending well.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Yeah, as long as you throw out the other three regular seasons of games and the playoff games in those years where they were good, and you  only include the two against Mahomes when we didn't have a single really effective pass rusher and the one against Burrow with a wave of injuries putting most of our best players out or shades of themselves, including DaQuan and Von gone ... yeah, as long as you only look at those, it doesn't look good.

 

You're also throwing out the big picture. You're going out of your way to cater to your confirmation bias and only look at things that lead to the conclusion you're looking for. It's one of the best blueprints for flawed thinking that humanity working in concert have ever found.

 

The offense wasn't nearly as injured in that Bengals game. They sucked too. How come you're not raving at them? They were pretty healthy.

 

Of course analysts are saying they may regress. That's true every season. Are Cosell, Bucky Brooks, Florio or Sims predicting they'll regress? Can you produce some links showing that?

 

Posted
13 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

At least on this forum, there seems to be a sizeable and vocal contingent who do not respect Frazier....examples:

 

 

 

I'm not saying these aren't fair points, but people seem to forget that he did run a defense that was consistently good and GOT us to the playoffs.

 

Nope. Haven't forgotten that.

 

But he's consistently been one of the main problems in our last game of the season for 4 consecutive years.

 

I think Joe Marino captures the "we're grateful to Leslie Frazier, but time to move on" sentiment 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Even the best defenses in football very rarely now "shut down" superior offenses. It is just not the game anymore. The Bills are hardly alone in that. San Francisco were the #1 defense in football this year. Gave up 31 to the Eagles in the playoffs (and could have been more had Philly needed to score again). The Eagles #2 defense gave up 38 in the Superbowl (okay a scoop and score in there, but counter that with the Chiefs kneeled away a certain TD at the end). You can't win the Superbowl shutting down top offenses now. You might have one game in a post season where you do it... might. But to make a deep post season run you are going to have to win on offense. 

 

Which does get us to the point where you and I have a note of agreement. The Bills need to both allocate more resources to their offense and do a better job of talent evaluation on offense (on the line in particular). Because even the top defenses in football, when faced with the top offenses, are going to give up 30 more often than not. You gotta win on offense. 

 

It is also why blaming the defense for Cincy and giving the atrocious offensive display a pass won't wash. The Bills are going nowhere in the playoffs whoever the coach is, whatever the defense does, if they can't execute better offensively. 

LMFAO at saying 'The niners defense gave up 31' and following that up with 'giving the atrocious offensive display a pass won't wash'

  • Agree 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, CincyBillsFan said:

For sure Frazier had Jackson & the Ravens figured out and he gets an A+ for that.  Otherwise the failings of his defense at key points against top offenses was a recurring theme.

 

 

 

 

It's also possible that the defensive squad was jacked up to shut down Lamar, and played an inspired game regardless of Leslie Frazier's game plan. Let's not forget the players play the game regardless of scheme.

Posted
19 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

LMFAO at saying 'The niners defense gave up 31' and following that up with 'giving the atrocious offensive display a pass won't wash'

 

They are two separate points. The 49ers had an atrocious offensive display as well on their 4th or 5th Quarterback or whatever he was. But regardless, the 49ers were going to have to outscore the Eagles. That is the point.

34 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

 

McD says almost nothing in most of his pressers.  He's not forthcoming, even with this Frasier thing.  Did Frasier's contract end and not renewed?  I mean who in this league gets to decide to step away from a Coordinator position for what essentially amounts to a sabatical?  I've never heard of this.  

 

Jim Schwartz did it like 2 years ago. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Schwartz did it like 2 years ago. 

 

Schwartz resigned.  

 

Has Frasier resigned?  If so then I missed that part of it.  

 

Resigning is resigning, "stepping away for a year" is not resigning.  

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, PBF81 said:

 

Schwartz resigned.  

 

Has Frasier resigned?  If so then I missed that part of it.  

 

Resigning is resigning, "stepping away for a year" is not resigning.  

 

 

The difference is Schwartz was under contract. Leslie isn't. But he resigned to step away from the sport and take a year out and was very clear that was what he was doing. He didn't resign and then see if there were other job options. He resigned to take a year out. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

They are two separate points. The 49ers had an atrocious offensive display as well on their 4th or 5th Quarterback or whatever he was. But regardless, the 49ers were going to have to outscore the Eagles. That is the point.

 

Jim Schwartz did it like 2 years ago. 

The actual point is that as far as levels of offensive atrocities go, the Niners defense actually had an excuse to give up 31. And they still held the Eagles under 270 total yards and 5/15 on third down. 

 

The Niners defense did decently operating under much worse conditions than the Bills defense. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, I'm Spartacus said:

It's also possible that the defensive squad was jacked up to shut down Lamar, and played an inspired game regardless of Leslie Frazier's game plan. Let's not forget the players play the game regardless of scheme.

Are you saying they were not jacked up to play the other games?

Posted
48 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

The Bills are going nowhere in the playoffs whoever the coach is, whatever the defense does, if they can't execute better offensively. 

I think the 13 seconds debacle demonstrated beyond question that our offense is good enough to get to the Championship game. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

I mean, there are a couple of points.

 

HC hired this season

Broncos - retread Sean Payton

Cards - Eagles DC Jon Gannon

Texans - 49ers DC DeMeco Ryans

Colts - Eagles OC Sean Steichen

Panthers - retread Frank Reich

 

2 retreads, 2 young DCs, 1 young OC

 

HC hired last season

Saints - Saints DC Dennis Allen, retread of failed Raiders HC

Giants - Bills OC Brian Daboll

Bears - Colts DC Matt Eberflus

Broncos - Green Bay OC Nathaniel Hackett

Dolphins - 49ers OC Mike McDaniel

LV Raiders -NE OC Josh McDaniels, retread of failed Denver HC and failed Rams OC

Vikings - LA Rams OC Kevin O'Connell

Jaguars - (out of football) Doug Pederson, retread of Eagles HC who failed to develop Carson Wentz but won a Superbowl and a WC game with Nick Foles

Texans - Texans DC Lovie Smith, retread Bucs and Bears HC.   With the Bears, Smith managed a Div, Conf, and SB appearance w/ QB Orton, Cutler, and Grossman

 

4 retreads (counting Allen as a retread), 1 middle-aged DC, 3 young OCs

 

So it's clearly not true that only hot young offensive coaches are being hired.  6 of the HC hires of the last 2 seasons are re-tread HCs, and 5 of 14 were defensive coaches.  However, only 2 of the 6 retreads hired were defensive coaches.

 

Leaving aside the "race" question, I think it's fair for Frazier to look at his accomplishments and say that he's shown at least as much as other coaches who got a 2nd chance.  What did Josh McDaniel do in Denver?  8-8, 4-12.  What did Dennis Allen do with the Raiders?  Two 4 and 12 seasons, one of them with Carson Palmer who moved to AZ and promptly showed that he could still play at a high level.  As DC, Allen led a couple top defenses (#4 and #5) with NO but they fizzed in the playoffs.

 

Meanwhile, Frazier has had 3 #1 or #2 defenses in his 6 years, and two of the years he didn't were rebuilding.  As a HC, he took the Vikes to 10-5 and a playoff appearance with Ponder as his QB.  Obviously, he'd get more looks if his D had performed better for the last 13 seconds last season and in the Cincy game this season, but failure of his defense to perform in a playoff game doesn't seem to have been a bar to Dennis Allen.

 

So why is that?  I'm not saying "race" is the answer, but I think it would be naive to think that it doesn't factor in.  The owners of NFL teams are, for the most part, old white guys, and for the most part, all of us (black white M F) are simply more comfortable with people who remind us of ourselves in some way.  Mostly we aren't even consciously aware of this kind of bias.

 

It wouldn't be a surprise to me if that question weighed on Frazier, as another season with a top ranked D and a playoff win apparently failed to get him so much as a phone call, while the Broncos traded away what? to get Payton out of retirement.  I would imagine there is an element of frustration there.  It's common advice for guys who have not made it as HC to take a year off before taking another position, so that they can be sure they have time to do a thorough "lessons learned".  That might apply to Frazier, as well.

 

As an immediate reason to step away and at this time, I'm not sure.  I would guess, that either there was going to be a change in the defense that he wasn't comfortable with - Joe Danna I think was brought in from Houston and Al Holcomb, whose longest experience was as LB coach of the Panthers, in part because the Bills want to utilize their safeties and LB a bit differently.  Maybe Frazier isn't comfortable with that? 

 

It's also possible that McDermott decided that he was going to call defensive plays next season, and Frazier understandably sees that as a demotion. 

 

Then there's the possibility that there are medical or family reasons.  After listening to Beane's entire presser, I personally think that is less likely.  The whole bit about he doesn't want to retire and Beane isn't sure if he'll be coaching with the Bills in 2024 just doesn't sound like a guy who asked for leave for those reasons, but that's entirely a personal opinion.
 

 

i think you are onto something with what happened within the bills org, but i think LF won't get HC looks because like KC's OC, he's seen as not really being the guy who runs the D, or at the very least that he doesn't run the D well without the influence of his HC.  I think that's correct, and i think w mcd being more involved we will look better in 2023

Posted
51 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

You can't win the Superbowl shutting down top offenses now. You might have one game in a post season where you do it... might. But to make a deep post season run you are going to have to win on offense. 

 

I'm not asking us to shut down the Bengals or the Chiefs. I'm asking to at least slow them down and make it difficult. Get some punches in. Don't just sit back and let them bleed you out slowly. The Chiefs didn't shut down the Bengals, but they held them to 20 points in a game where their offense wasn't performing at its best. They got two interceptions and several sacks. That's a far cry from 27 points scored in 3 quarters. And yes we had injuries and general talent issues in that game, but you can't honestly say the Chiefs defense was that much more talented than us across the board even with our injuries. Coaching was the biggest difference.

 

51 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

It is also why blaming the defense for Cincy and giving the atrocious offensive display a pass won't wash. The Bills are going nowhere in the playoffs whoever the coach is, whatever the defense does, if they can't execute better offensively. 

 

I don't see anyone giving the offense a pass. The defense couldn't have possibly held the Bengals below 10 points, no question. But likewise to what you're saying the offense's awful performance doesn't excuse the defenses's awful performance. And the defense making it look easy for our opponent is a 3 year trend now. At a certain point the coaching has to be held accountable when there are wide open receivers all over the field and no hint of a pass rush.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, PBF81 said:

  I mean who in this league gets to decide to step away from a Coordinator position for what essentially amounts to a sabatical?  I've never heard of this

This seems like a built in distraction for the entire 2023 season.  I am really not able to make sense the concept of this sabatical. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Chaos said:

I think the 13 seconds debacle demonstrated beyond question that our offense is good enough to get to the Championship game. 

Did you see the offense against Cinci? They were basically a very healthy unit. 

 

The old saying is you are only as good as your last game. Beane has used this phrase several times. However, he failed to give that massage in his end of season presser. Hmmm...

Posted
Just now, newcam2012 said:

Did you see the offense against Cinci? They were basically a very healthy unit. 

 

The old saying is you are only as good as your last game. Beane has used this phrase several times. However, he failed to give that massage in his end of season presser. Hmmm...

I did not say they were good enough to get to every championship game.  The defense has not demontrated the ability to carry a team that far.  Imagine if the headline of this article was "Josh Allen to take a year off".   Zero people would say "time for the defense to shine and take us to the promised land"

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...