Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, MJS said:

I would like to see more stunts and more manufactured pressure, personally. I have no issue with a rotation. They just need to be more effective, especially in the big games against big opponents.

I saw some of the things the Niners would do like pulling an end around a DT allowing an inside rush lane. Here I think we would benefit by putting Shaq and Boogie inside once in a while and basically play a 5-2-4.  Playing that zone nickel takes away a lot of flexibility to do different things. It's old, stale and very predictable.....just like the coach.

Edited by nosejob
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, ßookie_tech said:

After Von went down, we were left with a bunch of JAGS. We need guys like Feltcher Cox in our rotation.

 

 

Cox is a DT. And DT DaQuan Jones is no JAG, not by any definition.

 

We've got several guys who aren't JAGs even when Von is out, Ed's no JAG, nor is Rousseau, but Von's the only one who's a consistently special pass rusher.

 

When Von was in, all of the others were better and more effective. Typical for a terrific pass rusher.

 

Having both him and DaQuan out against the Bengals was a terrible blow.

 

And for what it's worth, there aren't many teams that have two consistently special pass rushers.

 

Marino's basic idea, that DL platoons are the commonest way to go these days, has been pretty obvious for a while. Bills fans who don't like them had better get used to them or find a team that won't be so irritating to them.

Edited by Thurman#1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, uticaclub said:

Remember when Chris Kelsey was the poster child for a terrible DE, now we have an entire unit of Chris Kelsey’s.

 

 

Kelsay was never a terrible DE. He just wasn't a special pass rusher. He was a good player, but wasn't a Bruce Smith or a Schobel, the last two DEs Bills fans were remembering and measuring Kelsay against.

 

And therefore despite being a pretty good player, he was the whipping boy for Bills fans.

 

 

Edited by Thurman#1
Posted
33 minutes ago, nosejob said:

I saw some of the things the Niners would do like pulling and end around a DT allowing an inside rush lane. Here I think we would benefit by putting Shaq and Boogie inside once in a while and basically play a 5-2-4.  Playing that zone nickel takes away a lot of flexibility to do different things. It's old, stale and very predictable.....just like the coach.

 

 

Yeah, look at how that flexible Niners defense did against the Eagles. 

 

Sometimes good defenses have bad games, most particularly when they suffer from many key injuries.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

Kelsay was never a terrible DE. He just wasn't a special pass rusher. He was a good player, but wasn't a Bruce Smith or a Schobel, the last two DEs Bills fans were remembering and measuring Kelsay against.

 

And therefore despite being a pretty good player, he was the whipping boy for Bills fans.

 

 

Kelsey started for 10 years and had like 30 career sacks. He had a great game against Tebow but other than that was consistently pushed around having fans wondering why he was on the field and kept getting extensions. As soon as he was cut from the Bills he retired because no other team had any interest in bring in the vet. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

Kelsey started for 10 years and had like 30 career sacks. He had a great game against Tebow but other than that was consistently pushed around having fans wondering why he was on the field and kept getting extensions. As soon as he was cut from the Bills he retired because no other team had any interest in bring in the vet. 

 

Kelsay wasn't cut and that wasn't the reason he retired.  

Posted (edited)

It is more a DC problem than a player problem, imo we have sufficient  talent, it is just not being schemed for success.  LF is far to rigid in his scheming and prefers contain vs an attacking style Defense, that works reasonably well against the average to lesser teams, hence our regular season record, but when it comes to playing the elite teams in post season games his scheme is just to predictable, and good HCs and their coordinators have shown that they know how to beat his scheme, three seasons in a row now…, and yet he still pretty much refuses to make adjustments to counter the best teams, and here we are in discussion about this yet again. 
 

GO BILLS!!!

Edited by Don Otreply
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Kelsay wasn't cut and that wasn't the reason he retired.  

You are right he wasn’t cut. He retired immediately after Marrone was hired and the rumors were he was going to be cut so he retired instead. Either way, he was that generation's AJE, maybe slightly worst given the rules then and now. Not every player is going to be Smith, Schobel, or even Jerry Hughes, but I remember questioning his play was something that brought fans together

Posted
12 hours ago, uticaclub said:

The rotation was never the issue, the results and lack of pressure and penetration is the issue. If everyone we drafted or signed for the DL were effective it would be great, but other than Miller every pick and signing has been a complete miss or JAG.

 

I thought Daquan jones was really disruptive.  Rousseau isn't flashy but he's a solid defensive end, i felt like he wasn't the same after he returned from his injury.

 

Oliver is a good-not-great defensive tackle, motor and quickness help with being undersized but I personally wouldn't commit to him long-term.  Phillips was playing really well, then he hurt his shoulder.  

 

As for the ends - Basham is the biggest disappointment as he basically lost his job to lawson.  Epenesa isn't very good as a run defender so that will always limit his usage.  

Posted
8 hours ago, John from Riverside said:


I disagreed that Groot has been a jag or a mess

 

He just doesn’t have help if von isn’t there

I want to like Groot, he hit a rookie wall in 21 and he disappeared around the same time in 22, which was right when Miller got hurt.

 

Year 3 is big for him, he needs to take a step up

Posted
9 hours ago, John from Riverside said:


I disagreed that Groot has been a jag or a mess

 

He just doesn’t have help if von isn’t there

This has been correct, but the root cause is play design and scheming, are you say that Basham, Epenesa, et al; are they not used to their best effect? 

Posted
1 hour ago, uticaclub said:

You are right he wasn’t cut. He retired immediately after Marrone was hired and the rumors were he was going to be cut so he retired instead. Either way, he was that generation's AJE, maybe slightly worst given the rules then and now. Not every player is going to be Smith, Schobel, or even Jerry Hughes, but I remember questioning his play was something that brought fans together

 

I had my complaints about Kelsay and wanted more.  He was a poor man's Phil Hansen but without Bruce Smith on the other side.  He was an okay player.

 

He wasn't going to be cut.  Here's why he retired.

 

The decision came this week after Kelsay spent months wavering on his future. Rather than keep the Bills guessing, he traveled from his offseason home in Nebraska to personally inform general manager Buddy Nix at the team's facility in Orchard Park.

"As I kind of went back and forth on it, I believe if you think about retirement that much, you're already retired," Kelsay said. "So I'm happy with the decision and look forward to the next chapter of my life."

The thought of retirement first entered Kelsay's mind after he tore a ligament in his neck during practice. He missed seven of Buffalo's final eight games, and finished on the injured reserve list.

Despite being cleared by team doctors last month, Kelsay was concerned about his health.

"I did not want to leave the game broke down," he said.

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/2013/02/28/chris-kelsay-buffalo-bills-retires

Posted
14 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

Something really interesting when he researched every DL with a minimum of 8 games played and to the conclusion, the Bills are middle of the pack in rotation.

#1 is the Eagles and #2 is the 49ers with the amount of rotation.

 

Also:

https://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2023/2/4/23585330/eagles-fletcher-cox-super-bowl-health-defensive-line-rotation-jalen-hurts-respect-nick-sirianni

 

https://www.knbr.com/2020/01/23/49ers-notebook-saleh-on-shanahans-leadership-style-the-d-line-rotation-and-a-raccoon-on-meth/

This was when Saleh was with the 49ers but he uses rotation with the Jets too.

 

“We have a philosophy to roll with eight on defense on the defensive line,” Saleh said. “You want to come at them at waves. You want to stay fresh. You want to keep going. All gas, keep them rolling, so they don’t pace themselves. A lot of times you get so stuck with playing your best four all the time that those guys understand they’re going to be out there for a while so they pace themselves.

We don’t want them pacing themselves. We want them rolling. So, those next four are every bit as important as the first four. And, one, we’ve still got to play great football when they’re on the football field. And, two, it allows those guys a break so when you get to those critical situations of two minute and third down, your four horses can be out there and be fresh so they can go get the quarterback.”

Saleh said the goal is to “steal” around two dozen snaps for that starting group each game.

 

https://www.newyorkjets.com/news/robert-saleh-on-the-math-that-leads-to-a-killer-defensive-line-rotation

 

"Whether they're run-stopping or jumping out of their shoes and pass-rushing, there's a level of fatigue that's associated with how we play," Ulbrich said. "We don't catch blocks, we don't read blocks — things are on our terms. When you play like that, with your hair on fire, with the energy and the strain that we demand of them, asking them to play any more than 35 snaps, I think, is detrimental to their health and the quality of play."

 

"We ask our D-line to do a lot from an attack standpoint, so physically it is hard, unless you're an absolute freakazoid like Aaron Donald, who can go forever," he said. "It's really not a 30-35 snap count, it's more of a percentage. There are obviously variables, but you're trying to hit a 70 percent mark. There are 60 to 65 snaps on average for a defensive team, so you're looking at 40 to 45 snaps. ... In a perfect scenario where we're winning games, 30 to 35 of those snaps are against the pass.

"Let's say we start the game, and I'll use Quinnen [Williams] as an example. He rolls out on first down, second down, they convert on third down. Well, get Quinnen off the field. Then he's not on the field for first down, second down. Third down, he's back on and we get off the field. In that scenario, he played four of six snaps, 67 percent."

The point of the math, both simple and advanced, Saleh explained, is to optimize the Jets linemen's input in the rotation that he, Ulbrich and DL coach Aaron Whitecotton began building last season.

"If you went on average, it's probably in that 70 percent range," the head coach said. "I think that's what we were hitting in San Francisco with DeForest Buckner, [Nick] Bosa, [Arik] Armstead. It's not a perfect science. If you're playing 90 snaps in a game, you're going to be in the 60-snap range.

"You're just trying to pace these guys so they're as fresh as possible when crunch time hits, those third downs, those two minutes when we need a play."

 

 


My problem has never been the defensive rotation as much as it had been the players who play in that rotation, and what the Bills spent to get those players.  You can find that kind of production from cheap FA’s - not 1st and second round draft picks 

Posted

I have to believe that coaching and scheme has something (a lot) to do with the problem.  Given their draft status, at least a couple of Oliver, Rousseau, Epenesa, Basham, Lawson, etc. should be very good players.  I don't believe that any of these guys were a reach by the Bills - they were all drafted around or below where they were projected to go.  (Terrell Bernard, that was a reach.)  Hughes having success in Houston is also indicative of something.  I don't know if it's scheme, technique, or what, but the Bills are just not getting great production out of guys that have talent.  It's highly unlikely that the Bills swung and missed on that many draft picks.

Posted

DLine was never the same after Von and Phillips went down.   early in the season both were tearing it up.  Phillips played sparingly most of the season mostly while injured.  really think that last season came down to alot off the field adversity and injuries to key guys.   seemed like the team was just spent at the end.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...