Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Something really interesting when he researched every DL with a minimum of 8 games played and to the conclusion, the Bills are middle of the pack in rotation.

#1 is the Eagles and #2 is the 49ers with the amount of rotation.

 

Also:

https://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2023/2/4/23585330/eagles-fletcher-cox-super-bowl-health-defensive-line-rotation-jalen-hurts-respect-nick-sirianni

 

https://www.knbr.com/2020/01/23/49ers-notebook-saleh-on-shanahans-leadership-style-the-d-line-rotation-and-a-raccoon-on-meth/

This was when Saleh was with the 49ers but he uses rotation with the Jets too.

 

“We have a philosophy to roll with eight on defense on the defensive line,” Saleh said. “You want to come at them at waves. You want to stay fresh. You want to keep going. All gas, keep them rolling, so they don’t pace themselves. A lot of times you get so stuck with playing your best four all the time that those guys understand they’re going to be out there for a while so they pace themselves.

We don’t want them pacing themselves. We want them rolling. So, those next four are every bit as important as the first four. And, one, we’ve still got to play great football when they’re on the football field. And, two, it allows those guys a break so when you get to those critical situations of two minute and third down, your four horses can be out there and be fresh so they can go get the quarterback.”

Saleh said the goal is to “steal” around two dozen snaps for that starting group each game.

 

https://www.newyorkjets.com/news/robert-saleh-on-the-math-that-leads-to-a-killer-defensive-line-rotation

 

"Whether they're run-stopping or jumping out of their shoes and pass-rushing, there's a level of fatigue that's associated with how we play," Ulbrich said. "We don't catch blocks, we don't read blocks — things are on our terms. When you play like that, with your hair on fire, with the energy and the strain that we demand of them, asking them to play any more than 35 snaps, I think, is detrimental to their health and the quality of play."

 

"We ask our D-line to do a lot from an attack standpoint, so physically it is hard, unless you're an absolute freakazoid like Aaron Donald, who can go forever," he said. "It's really not a 30-35 snap count, it's more of a percentage. There are obviously variables, but you're trying to hit a 70 percent mark. There are 60 to 65 snaps on average for a defensive team, so you're looking at 40 to 45 snaps. ... In a perfect scenario where we're winning games, 30 to 35 of those snaps are against the pass.

"Let's say we start the game, and I'll use Quinnen [Williams] as an example. He rolls out on first down, second down, they convert on third down. Well, get Quinnen off the field. Then he's not on the field for first down, second down. Third down, he's back on and we get off the field. In that scenario, he played four of six snaps, 67 percent."

The point of the math, both simple and advanced, Saleh explained, is to optimize the Jets linemen's input in the rotation that he, Ulbrich and DL coach Aaron Whitecotton began building last season.

"If you went on average, it's probably in that 70 percent range," the head coach said. "I think that's what we were hitting in San Francisco with DeForest Buckner, [Nick] Bosa, [Arik] Armstead. It's not a perfect science. If you're playing 90 snaps in a game, you're going to be in the 60-snap range.

"You're just trying to pace these guys so they're as fresh as possible when crunch time hits, those third downs, those two minutes when we need a play."

 

 

Edited by Royale with Cheese
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted

Awesome. Thank you for sharing! 
 

 

Shocking really, people on this message board complained about our D-Line rotation but didn’t look across the league to see what they were doing. 

  • Agree 5
  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JGMcD2 said:

Awesome. Thank you for sharing! 
 

 

Shocking really, people on this message board complained about our D-Line rotation but didn’t look across the league to see what they were doing. 

The rotation was never the issue, the results and lack of pressure and penetration is the issue. If everyone we drafted or signed for the DL were effective it would be great, but other than Miller every pick and signing has been a complete miss or JAG.

Edited by uticaclub
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 9
  • Thank you (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah I think the rotation works when there is little to no drop off in play. We don’t have that here. 
 

I assure you that Nick Bosa and Hassan Reddick are on the field for all critical third downs regardless of whose turn it is. 

Edited by MrEpsYtown
  • Like (+1) 12
Posted
Just now, MrEpsYtown said:

Yeah I think the rotation works when there is little to no drop off in play. We don’t have that here. 
 

I assure you that Nick Bosa and Hassan Reddick are on the field for all critical third downs regardless of whose turn it is. 

 

We did the same thing.  Miller and Oliver would rotate in on 3rd down a lot if they weren't in on 1st/2nd.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

We did the same thing.  Miller and Oliver would rotate in on 3rd down a lot if they weren't in on 1st/2nd.  


I’d like to see more Rousseau in that situation as well

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

We did the same thing.  Miller and Oliver would rotate in on 3rd down a lot if they weren't in on 1st/2nd.  

 

Oliver, not a difference maker without Miller. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I would like to see more stunts and more manufactured pressure, personally. I have no issue with a rotation. They just need to be more effective, especially in the big games against big opponents.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:


I’d like to see more Rousseau in that situation as well

 

I think Miller going down hurt Rousseau the most.

12 hours ago, ScottLaw said:

The problem is the resources they’ve used on the rotation and the ROI has been poor…. No issues with a rotation, but they need to find contributors in later rounds at this point/better FA finds for that rotation because it’s doing the rest of your team a disservice by putting other positions on the back burner. 

 

Scott, you were very vocal that DL rotations are stupid.

 

I'm not fully convinced it's not a philosophical issue.  I think we make our DL too disciplined or something.  Hughes had the most sacks since 2014 last year with the Texans.  He's 8 years older since 2014 and had his best statistical season.

 

 

Edited by Royale with Cheese
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I have little issue with the number of DL we have 

I do have an issues with the fact that under Beane the Buffalo Bills have been one of the three most expensive lines in the NFL in 2019, 2020, 2021, and will be again in 2023.

 

All on top of also investing 2x firsts, 2x seconds, and a third round pick. 
 

The value has been horrendous. If we were a top 3 line we would have no issue. But instead we just won’t sign anybody from the 2018 draft because we don’t have the money. 

Edited by Mango
  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
Just now, Mango said:

I have little issue with the number of DL we have 

I do have an issues with the fact that under Beane the Buffalo Bills have been one of the three most expensive lines in the NFL in 2019, 2020, 2021, and will be again in 2023.

 

All on top of also investing 2x firsts, 2x seconds, and a third round pick. 
 

The value has been horrendous. 

ROI is virtually negative. Basham, Epenesa, Jefferson, Butler, Lotulelei, Oliver, Settle, Lawson, etc. Not one of these guys was/is even close to a difference maker.

 

It's really discouraging. Our regime has made numerous poor mistakes and misappropriated assets to such an extreme degree in one direction while still having little to show for it.

 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

I have never understood why OBD insists on this rotation, uses high picks to staff it, then uses those picks (Basham, Epenesa, Oliver, Rousseau) no more than on 50% of the snaps.  

 

It's disjointed, ineffective, and no better than equal cost to benefit.  

 

If your team needs this rotation, spreads snaps out evenly for DT's and DE's to keep them under 65%, but continues prioritizing this as their QB is inked long-term, something's gotta give eventually.  It's not the same as what SF, PHI, CIN, or KC is doing.    

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MrEpsYtown said:


I’d like to see more Rousseau in that situation as well

 

 

I didn't watch that segment because Greg Rousseau played just 49% and Von Miller played just 61% of the snaps when they played...........Nick Bosa played 74%.

 

I don't care a lot about how much the Bills rotate their non-stars versus other teams.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

 

Oliver, not a difference maker without Miller. 

 

Oliver is undersized as a DT, even as a 3T.

 

At the time he was drafted the Bills brass overlooked some of the classic measurables for defensive tackle and were kind of star-struck by the athleticism, but there were some warning signs of where Oliver landed and whether he could overcome those measurables that scouts look for in most DTs:

 

Height  6' 1⅞"          10th percentile

Weight  287 lbs.        52nd  percentile

Wingspan 77 ⅜"       14th  percentile

Arm Length 31 ¾"      7th  percentile

Hand Size 9 ¼"         10th  percentile

 

It is less about the DE's in the rotation with Oliver and more about the DT that is playing the 1 tech next to him.

 

If that guy forces teams to pay attention to him and forces the double-teams and can get some push while he is at it, Oliver can be disruptive. He does a good job 1:1 against most interior linemen. He can beat them with his speed off the snap, his athleticism, and great leverage.  If teams can handle our 1-tech then Oliver gets pushed around and swallowed up by the double-teams - he is basically nullified.

 

That is why we tend to see games where he disappears - you have to look at who is playing next to him and how well that guy is doing.

 

Oliver shined best last season with Jones playing next to him being disruptive from that 1-tech spot, but that is probably not what the Bills envisioned when they selected him #9 overall. They thought they were getting a guy who could be a difference maker on a more consistent basis.

 

Oliver is a good player mind you, but he will always be measured for being a top 10 pick.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, uticaclub said:

The rotation was never the issue, the results and lack of pressure and penetration is the issue. If everyone we drafted or signed for the DL were effective it would be great, but other than Miller every pick and signing has been a complete miss or JAG.


I disagreed that Groot has been a jag or a mess

 

He just doesn’t have help if von isn’t there

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...