Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

They could hire Vince Lombardi himself and they wouldn’t win with Kyler Murray

 

He seems very toxic

Edited by DJB
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

Gannon just laid an egg in the SB after his management hired Vic Fangio for two weeks to teach him how to coach against KC...........you gotta' go Anarumo,  Bidwell!  (get that guy the hell out of the AFC please)

 

https://arizonasports.com/story/3497155/reports-cardinals-focused-on-jonathan-gannon-lou-anarumo-for-head-coach/

 

Wouldn't the same "laid an egg" logic apply to Anarumo's defense for the Bengals loss in the AFCCG?

 

Not that I wouldn't be happy to see Anarumo move on

Edited by Beck Water
Posted
6 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Wouldn't the same "laid an egg" logic apply to Anarumo's defense for the Bengals loss in the AFCCG?

 

Not that I wouldn't be happy to see Anarumo move on

 

 

Big Lou has had one season in Cincy where his D wasn't crap.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Wouldn't the same "laid an egg" logic apply to Anarumo's defense for the Bengals loss in the AFCCG?

 

 

 

I think the answer is obviously no.

 

The Bengals gave up just 23 points in the Chiefs own stadium.

 

The Eagles D got dominated.   

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

Gannon just laid an egg in the SB after his management hired Vic Fangio for two weeks to teach him how to coach against KC...........you gotta' go Anarumo,  Bidwell!  (get that guy the hell out of the AFC please)

 

https://arizonasports.com/story/3497155/reports-cardinals-focused-on-jonathan-gannon-lou-anarumo-for-head-coach/

In Gannon’s defence Fangio mainly advised the Eagles offensive staff. Maybe he should have spent more time with his protege. Chiefs actually got much more valuable outside advice from Doug Pederson who told a Bieniemy that Eagles D always cheated and bit hard on motion. The result was the play design that resulted in two TDs and a winning field goal.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, starrymessenger said:

In Gannon’s defence Fangio mainly advised the Eagles offensive staff. Maybe he should have spent more time with his protege. Chiefs actually got much more valuable outside advice from Doug Pederson who told a Bieniemy that Eagles D always cheated and bit hard on motion. The result was the play design that resulted in two TDs and a winning field goal.

 

 

Hey I'm tryna' sell a 56 year old DC as a first time HC here,  c'mon.

 

Also Bengals get no comp picks!

 

Win-win.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
11 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

Gannon just laid an egg in the SB after his management hired Vic Fangio for two weeks to teach him how to coach against KC...........you gotta' go Anarumo,  Bidwell!  (get that guy the hell out of the AFC please)

 

https://arizonasports.com/story/3497155/reports-cardinals-focused-on-jonathan-gannon-lou-anarumo-for-head-coach/

Shocking that not one team is interested in Frazier,  Frazier need to understand that weak conservative assistants almost never get considered for HC positions.   I also believe that Sean will end up getting fired if he continues to cover for him.  Firing your safety assistant coach is a sign of weakness not do what is best for the team

Posted
38 minutes ago, Niagara Dude said:

Shocking that not one team is interested in Frazier,  Frazier need to understand that weak conservative assistants almost never get considered for HC positions.   I also believe that Sean will end up getting fired if he continues to cover for him.  Firing your safety assistant coach is a sign of weakness not do what is best for the team

 

I mean he has had interviews in 3 hiring cycles (including the last 2) in his 6 years in Buffalo. It is not like he has never garnered interest. His age and the fact he is a retread both go against him more than his defense. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

I think the answer is obviously no.

 

The Bengals gave up just 23 points in the Chiefs own stadium.

 

The Eagles D got dominated.   

 

 

The Eagles gave up essentially 24 points (defensive td plus the Toney punt return accounted for 14), 340 yards, and 21 first downs. The Bengals gave up 23 points, 357 yards, and 23 first downs. Both defenses lost the game on controversial albeit valid penalty calls (although the Eagles penalty was certainly more questionable given the way the game was being called). So … kind of a complete wash to me. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Eagles gave up essentially 24 points (defensive td plus the Toney punt return accounted for 14), 340 yards, and 21 first downs. The Bengals gave up 23 points, 357 yards, and 23 first downs. Both defenses lost the game on controversial albeit valid penalty calls (although the Eagles penalty was certainly more questionable given the way the game was being called). So … kind of a complete wash to me. 

 

But still we want Cincy to lose a coordinator so stop with the facts 😛. Seriously though, Michael Bidwell always gives me the impression he could make hiring decisions based on rival fan forums!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

The Eagles gave up essentially 24 points (defensive td plus the Toney punt return accounted for 14), 340 yards, and 21 first downs. The Bengals gave up 23 points, 357 yards, and 23 first downs. Both defenses lost the game on controversial albeit valid penalty calls (although the Eagles penalty was certainly more questionable given the way the game was being called). So … kind of a complete wash to me. 

You have to factor in the time of possession though.

 

Eagles offence was ripping 8 minute drives basically all game.

 

Mahomes barely had a chance to see the field, so it was even more remarkable they got the yards/points that they did 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...