Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
35 minutes ago, nbbillsfan said:


I haven’t heard much about Dorsey or Frazier. I don’t get the sense he like to talk poorly about current players/coaches. The player is an offensive player and one thing that is interesting is he said that if he has an option to play for daboll im the future, he would love to. He said daboll is the best coach he ever had (he said this last off-season, before it was as obvious how good a coach Daboll is). 
 

He hasn't said much about specific needs but he said that the bills biggest offensive problem is the lack of efficiency at getting 6-8 yards when they just need to move the chains. He said that skill is what made Brady the Goat, and what the bengals and chiefs do at a much higher level than we do. He said he wasn’t sure whether Josh, other personnel, or scheme where most to blame for this.

Are you a Pats fan?

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
On 2/10/2023 at 5:50 PM, JayBaller10 said:

They’d never do a Diggs for Parsons trade without something else going back to the Cowboys. Parsons has more value as a pass rusher. It’d be like trading Lawrence Taylor for Marvin Harrison or Isaac Bruce. It’d never happen.

+ Edmunds!

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said:

If Jerrah is willing to give us a 1 and 2, or player like Lamb and a 3 good bye Stef. 

Just the cap hit we take if we trade Diggs is enough to ensure he's not getting traded.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Billz4ever said:

Just the cap hit we take if we trade Diggs is enough to ensure he's not getting traded.

What do we lose? Doesn’t the acquiring team assume all contract liabilities?

Posted
Just now, Dr.Sack said:

What do we lose? Doesn’t the acquiring team assume all contract liabilities?

Dead cap.  You can look it up on spotrac and it's not pretty.

Posted

I know its been said already on here with the money situation Diggs prob doesn't get traded, but if there was a way to trade him and turn that into adding multiple solid targets for Allen, not sayin another  "superstar #1 wr"  just more solid pieces to make this offense more varied. Spread the ball around and make it much harder to defend. I like what KC did with Hill, Bills should follow that blueprint. Do that and upgrade the OL!!!  oh and hopefully Dorseys leash is very short, he needs to show alot of improvement in year 2

Posted
47 minutes ago, billybob71 said:

I know its been said already on here with the money situation Diggs prob doesn't get traded, but if there was a way to trade him and turn that into adding multiple solid targets for Allen, not sayin another  "superstar #1 wr"  just more solid pieces to make this offense more varied. Spread the ball around and make it much harder to defend. I like what KC did with Hill, Bills should follow that blueprint. Do that and upgrade the OL!!!  oh and hopefully Dorseys leash is very short, he needs to show alot of improvement in year 2

There’s a huge, tight end size difference between what the Bills and Chiefs have. A QB must have a go to guy, and in your plan you are trading away Josh’s go to guy. Trading away a top 5 receiver in the league and not getting back a #1 receiver would be a monumental mistake-just ask the Packers! 
 

people need to calm down with this whole “Diggs is turning back into a diva” thing. Why, because he was frustrated and has voiced it? That makes 99.9% of the people who post in the GDT divas so they need to go as well! That’s how that works, right? 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Dr.Sack said:

If Jerrah is willing to give us a 1 and 2, or player like Lamb and a 3 good bye Stef. 

Why would Dallas give up Lamb plus a pick for a guy with similar production that is 6 years older and has a history of being a locker room problem?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Billl said:

Why would Dallas give up Lamb plus a pick for a guy with similar production that is 6 years older and has a history of being a locker room problem?

 

And the Bills wouldn't want Lamb.......he's eligible for extension and will probably demand even more than Tyreek Hill's $30M aav and he has a 100 catch season at age 23 to justify it.  

 

He's going to be in a whole different zip code than Diggs with his next contract. 

 

Diggs is price controlled where the Bills want him and his deal extends out far enough that he knows he isn't likely to have another good contract after it.............so that creates the option for dummy years to be added on etc.. without having to put 9 figures in escrow like Jerry will be doing with CeeDee this offseason(most likely).

  • Agree 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Billz4ever said:

He's a UFA.

Fine. I'll give them Edmunds, Oliver and Singletary for Parsons and Diggs. That's 3 for 2 and for good measure, I'll even throw in a 24' 7th Just so we can bring the brothers together. 

 

/end sarcasm. 🤷

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Ya Digg? said:

There’s a huge, tight end size difference between what the Bills and Chiefs have. A QB must have a go to guy, and in your plan you are trading away Josh’s go to guy. Trading away a top 5 receiver in the league and not getting back a #1 receiver would be a monumental mistake-just ask the Packers! 
 

people need to calm down with this whole “Diggs is turning back into a diva” thing. Why, because he was frustrated and has voiced it? That makes 99.9% of the people who post in the GDT divas so they need to go as well! That’s how that works, right? 


I don’t think Diggs pitching a fit is a key concern, as much as the subsequent interview where he refuses to call Josh by name and admits it was down to increasing tension through the latter part of the season. Diggs is Josh’s number one guy, but the key to that is a good relationship. Is it as strong as it was? Diggs’ interview suggests not.

Posted

I, personally, think it's crazy that posters are considering trading Stefon Diggs basically because he had a public, verbal spat with Josh Allen on the sidelines during a game they needed to win to advance to the AFCCG. Especially not knowing what was said!! Maybe Diggs was trying to give Josh some constructive criticism. On top of the fact that they are asking the GM to get Josh another weapon to help the offense. Carumba!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

They arent trading Diggs. He is our #1 and there is no one behind him even close on our team.  More importantly, there would be a huge cap hit that this team can't afford.  Cant even afford to sign our own guys ffs.  This ***** is just overblown garbage because Diggs was mad on the sideline.  Big deal.  This happens on every field every week in the NFL.  Diggs will be fine.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 2/10/2023 at 5:52 PM, PrimeTime101 said:

 

Now lets talk about KC yes? they in the SB yes? Their #1 WR is ranked in the mid 30's and their #2 WR is ranked in the 50's. The point is, many teams do quite find with a 2A and a 2B WR. 

 

Sorry man, but you really can't say this and conveniently not mention the fact that they also have the greatest TE ever in his prime. You're allowed to slack on wide receivers when you have Travis Kelce. Diggs is essentially our Kelce in terms of impact. If you can somehow get Kelce Jr on this team, then Diggs may become more expendable, but you can't roll with both sub-par WRs and TEs.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...