Bobby Hooks Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 It’s pretty simple. Players were always willing to go there for dirt cheap contracts to try and win a Super Bowl with Brady. Those days are well past. And I couldn’t be happier about it. Quote
Chicken Boo Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 It's no 1 thing. Brady doesn't have 4 of his rings if not for the leg of Vinatieri and a great defensive play by Malcolm Butler. That's not to say Brady didn't play his part. Of course he did, but the Pats were a well oiled machine from the top down and they adapted, every season, to the personnel they fielded. That's excellent coaching. It's far from just Brady. 1 1 1 Quote
2003Contenders Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 First, it starts at the top with Kraft giving BB unwavering and total control of the team -- and mostly staying out of his way to do what he needed to do. Anyone coming to the Patriots as a coach or player knew this going in -- and it makes a big difference not only from a continuity perspective but also from an accountability perspective when everyone knows who is in charge. Then it is about a system that everyone on the team MUST buy into -- or be shown the door. Remember, for the introductions for their first Super Bowl they were simply introduced as "the team" refusing to be introduced individually. And, while player-for-player they may not have had many superstars, they had hard-nosed, intelligent and versatile guys who were willing to do whatever it took to win -- even if the game plan called for different personnel game-in and game-out. In a way, this concept and approach reminds me a lot of Shula's 70's era Dolphins. They had that no-name defense loaded with lunch-pale guys who knew their role and limited their mistakes. And then, of course, there was Brady who elevated the play of his supporting cast, was clutch in big games, and was obsessed with winning. Quote
bigduke6 Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 (edited) cheating? bending the rules until they nearly break? underpaying Tom Brady? funneling money into Tom's charity to make up the difference? i cant really explain how they managed to stay so good for so long tbh. Belicheat has never drafted particularly well. they bought a few decent free agents over the years but nobody world breaking. mbe it was just the system with a HoF QB, mbe it was more. before a late round QB who was terrible in college became the best ever, Belicheck was a middling coach who even the Browns thought was garbage. suddenly a light bulb turned on somewhere for Bill. mbe he just got lucky. seems like hes back to being a middling coach now. Edited March 22, 2023 by bigduke6 1 1 Quote
Yantha Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 (edited) Brady and a top head coach. amazing cap management and player evaluations for free agency. amazing management of acquisitions of extra draft picks. I always wondered how they always seemed to have MORE picks than the average team…. cheating Edited March 22, 2023 by Yantha Quote
Nextmanup Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 On 2/6/2023 at 11:04 AM, Gregg said: Brady the GOAT, Belichick the GOAT. Built a solid roster around #12. The Bills, Dolphins, Jets = Three stooges. Division was a joke as NE would usually have it clinched by late Oct/ early Nov. Because of it they usually had the #1 or #2 seed so they rarely had to play on WC weekend. It's really not that complicated! Quote
PBF81 Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 On 2/6/2023 at 11:04 AM, Gregg said: Brady the GOAT, Belichick the GOAT. Built a solid roster around #12. The Bills, Dolphins, Jets = Three stooges. Division was a joke as NE would usually have it clinched by late Oct/ early Nov. Because of it they usually had the #1 or #2 seed so they rarely had to play on WC weekend. Right there to a T, the top-2 reasons. That cannot possibly be understated. The lack of divisional beating perennially that other teams were not subjected to is huge. The number of different starting QBs that went thru Buffalo, NY, and Miami during that stretch were 29 Buffalo (9), Miami (11), and the Jets (9). Fitzpatrick played for all three teams, he counts three times therefore. Otherwise, the three had 20 different total coaches among them during Brady's tenure. The Jets are the only team that went to the playoffs with any regularity. Miami made it three times but lost in the WC round every time. We only went in '17 and '19, also losing both times in the WC round. We're seeing what Belichick would have been without Brady right now. He's employing the same team-building strategy. It's still on his high end for career coaching w/o Brady, and he's got all that experience from the Brady years too. I don't give him the credit that others do. Had Mo Lewis not knocked Bledsoe into the Twilight Zone, Belichick would have likely continued to ride Bledsoe, who was already 5-13 with him at the time, into the next team as a DC probably. For that reason I hate Mo Lewis. Quote
WideNine Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 (edited) Top tier OL coach that could get the most out of middling OL talent - since retired. Which kept an efficient GOAT Brady upright with enough time to find a few above average targets, Gronk, Welker, Edelman, Brown... Solid drafting on defense with a pretty good defensive mind in Belichick. And...cheating 😁 Edited March 22, 2023 by WideNine Quote
bobobonators Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 On 2/6/2023 at 11:04 AM, Gregg said: Brady the GOAT, Belichick the GOAT. Built a solid roster around #12. The Bills, Dolphins, Jets = Three stooges. Division was a joke as NE would usually have it clinched by late Oct/ early Nov. Because of it they usually had the #1 or #2 seed so they rarely had to play on WC weekend. Also helped that the Jets, Bills and Fins were all an absolute joke for 10+yrs. They were already 6-0 in August 1 1 Quote
ganesh Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 58 minutes ago, Yantha said: Brady and a top head coach. amazing cap management and player evaluations for free agency. amazing management of acquisitions of extra draft picks. I always wondered how they always seemed to have MORE picks than the average team…. cheating An important point to note also is that the rest of the AFC East sucked during that 17 year period (except for the 2 years of Rex Ryan Jets). Brady and the Patriots won the AFC East with ease setting themselves up with good seeding and playing in Foxboro. These are small things but they have a big impact. When the AFC East teams actually competed, they beat up on Brady and the Patriots! 1 Quote
T master Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 On 2/6/2023 at 10:00 AM, Success said: I thought it might be interesting to put our loathing aside and really analyze how they pulled it off. What they did is what I want the Bills to do - dominate for many years, and as long as they have Allen at QB. They didn't have the ebb & flow that a team normally has, even w/ a top QB. Their window was wide open for most of those 17 years. They made 9 SB's, and probably should have made 1-2 more. My own thoughts: 1) Obviously, Brady took less pay so the team could afford better players. I still don't see that being as impactful as it's made out to be - he was still paid a lot. 2) Aging vet stars took pay cuts just to play w/ Brady. Will we see that w/ Allen? 3) The Patriots made very few investments in bigtime skill players. Moss was the exception, not the rule. 4) One of the hallmarks of Belichick was letting players walk before they started to decline. Almost exactly what we're looking at w/ Poyer. 5) Their biggest priority, year after year, was making sure the O-line was strong. That's just what you do when you have a top QB. Still, the run is somewhat mystifying. Belichick was not a great drafter, which is usually needed once a QB gets past the rookie contract. Superior coaching clearly played a part. I think BB got the best out of his players (which is something we aren't doing right now - we see players leave the Bills and perform better than they did here). Thoughts? Some of the things they did to continue getting players while keeping their cap in line was to get rid of players they knew would require huge contracts if they kept them around & would sign those elite players before they were at the end of their rookie contracts . Between that FA & having Brady make average players look great there you have it . If Beane would do what they did with the likes of Edmunds & Oliver they could have had another lets say 3 draft picks 2 last year if they would have traded Edmunds because they basically knew he wasn't going to be here because of the money he would demand & now Oliver the same thing . If last year they would have put Oliver up for a trade they could have had at least 1 more draft pick & not been on the hook for his 5th year contract totally guaranteed but they basically screwed themselves in some ways by giving him his 5th yr & won't get anything in return for what they have invested in him . We know loyalty to the team that drafted them is no longer a part of the equation it's all about the money which is cool so why should the team be loyal to keeping them when it's not reciprocated it's been proven to be the way things are now in the NFL so the teams future when it comes to keeping the cap in line should be a huge consideration but isn't for the players it's all about them & their future which is cool . 1 Quote
Einstein Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 12 minutes ago, ganesh said: An important point to note also is that the rest of the AFC East sucked during that 17 year period (except for the 2 years of Rex Ryan Jets). Brady and the Patriots won the AFC East with ease setting themselves up with good seeding and playing in Foxboro. These are small things but they have a big impact. When the AFC East teams actually competed, they beat up on Brady and the Patriots! Patriots had a lower winning % against the AFC than they did against the rest of the NFL. Quote
dma0034 Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 I mean, I'll put it in order: 1. Goat at QB 2. Possible Goat at Coach 3. Weak division. They would often go 5-1 or 6-0 in the division. This would allow them to get a first round bye a lot because if you go 5-1 on the division and 7-3 or 6-4 you have a good chance at atleast the 2 seed... which was a bye at the time 4. Teams played the Patriots scared which often resulted in exceptional dumb: play calling and gafts 5. Cheating 6. Only 1 high level QB during their time (Manning) unless you want to count Roethlisberger. Imagine if Allen was in the NFC... he'd be the best and only Hurts would be in the discussion. In the AFC you can easily make a case for Mahomes and Burrows and then there are some good QBs behind the big 3 in the AFC. Mahomes and Burrows couldn't beat the Bills and the other team in back to back years Quote
mannc Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 2 hours ago, ganesh said: An important point to note also is that the rest of the AFC East sucked during that 17 year period (except for the 2 years of Rex Ryan Jets). Brady and the Patriots won the AFC East with ease setting themselves up with good seeding and playing in Foxboro. These are small things but they have a big impact. When the AFC East teams actually competed, they beat up on Brady and the Patriots! There is no question that the rest of the AFC was pretty hapless over that span, but it's also possible that the rest of the AFC East was bad because of the Patriots...the Jets, Bills and Dolphins were going into every season with two losses on their schedule...they were constantly trying to build their teams to beat Brady and the Pats instead of just building a winning team...the Pats were in their heads. Quote
BBFL Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 3 hours ago, bigduke6 said: cheating? bending the rules until they nearly break? underpaying Tom Brady? funneling money into Tom's charity to make up the difference? i cant really explain how they managed to stay so good for so long tbh. Belicheat has never drafted particularly well. they bought a few decent free agents over the years but nobody world breaking. mbe it was just the system with a HoF QB, mbe it was more. before a late round QB who was terrible in college became the best ever, Belicheck was a middling coach who even the Browns thought was garbage. suddenly a light bulb turned on somewhere for Bill. mbe he just got lucky. seems like hes back to being a middling coach now. Totally disagree on the drafting part… you are WAY off. Every year after Brady in 2000 that team drafted starters or major contributors to the Patriots somewhere in the draft until Brady’s departure. The only exceptions were their ‘06, ‘07 & ‘08 classes… ‘07 being the worst. Those drafts, respectively, still netted them; Gostkowski, Brandon Merriweather, Matt Slater and Jerod Mayo. All of which had significant contributions to the organization. WR may be the only complete flop at a position they had during that period in terms of drafting… Though one is a HOF Special Teamer and the other 2 (Edelman and Malcom Mitchell) are the sole reason they completed the largest comeback in Super Bowl History. You’re right in essence however… It was the system with a HOF QB. And more. They cheated multiple times to gain a competitive edge. That had to have made the difference here or there. The drafting though? The drafting was top notch for nearly 20 years. Multiple lengthy contributors virtually every year. Playing garbage opponents 6 times a year for decades was the icing on the cake. Quote
Just in Atlanta Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 Kelly Holcomb Trent Edwards JP Losman Kyle Orton EJ Manuel Tyrod Taylor Chad Pennington Kellen Clemons Mark Sanchez Geno Smith Jay Fiedler Chad Pennington Gus Ferotte Joey Harrington AJ Feely and etc. vs Tom Brady 1 Quote
Just in Atlanta Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 ... I count 57 starting quarterbacks 🤮 for the other three AFCE teams from 2001 to 2019. ... And 25 head coaches - 9 for the Bills, 10 for the Dolphins, 6 for the Jets. With the exception of the one year he was injured, it's been all Tom Brady for the Patriots. ... And Belichick has been the lone head coach for 22 years. This continuity is a big part of the success. It's both a cause and an effect. Quote
papazoid Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 tuck rule falsified injury reports spygate(2007) peds gate (2007) deflategate(2015) snowplowgate (1982) leapergate(1961) walkthroughgate(2002) formationgate(2015) vs ravens headsetgate malfunction to opponents scraps gate Sign an opponent's recently-cut player to your practice squad to get intel stolen playsheets playclock loophole phony do your job video crew salary cap circumvention bugged opponents lockerroom fire alarms pulled in wee hours of visiting hotels illegal use of injured reserve beli-cheat - coined by don shula Quote
Jay_Fixit Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 7 hours ago, Bobby Hooks said: It’s pretty simple. Players were always willing to go there for dirt cheap contracts to try and win a Super Bowl with Brady. Those days are well past. And I couldn’t be happier about it. Hey captain serious! I was gonna say they taped practices but your answer was much more plausible LMFORFALOLOK Quote
Charles Romes Posted March 22, 2023 Posted March 22, 2023 Brady was so good he could get away with garbage at receiver in his prime. You also could corners on the oline since he got rid of the ball so quick. And, he always took less himself. He created massive savings throughout the office with highest production. Allen has been good enough to mask flaws through the offense and win the division. But that’s it so far. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.