ChiGoose Posted May 9 Posted May 9 (edited) Boy is Julie’s law school going to be embarrassed when they learn she can’t tell the difference between the numbers 10 and 2. RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA FAIL: JULIE KELLY’S TROUBLES WITH TEN AND TWO Tl;dr: local legal expert cannot tell the difference between a box labeled “2” and a box labeled “10”, assumed they were the same thing and then accidentally made an argument for Trump’s guilt: ”Poor Julie took a description of a box found in the storage closet, treated it as a description of a box found somewhere else, and then simply never bothered to check what that box — the box Jay Bratt was actually referring to — actually contained. Julie the propagandist suggests that if the picture were accurate — if there really were seven documents that still had cover sheets in the box that Jay Bratt was actually describing — then it would accurately support an argument that, “the former president is a criminal and threat to national security.” And wow, that may be a problem, conceding that that picture supported an argument that Trump was a national security threat! Because nothing Julie claims in her post describes this box. And her claims that the FBI made this picture as damning as possible is debunked when you look at the actual contents of the box (or even, the picture itself).“ Edited May 9 by ChiGoose 1
daz28 Posted May 9 Posted May 9 7 hours ago, BillStime said: So this was all bs contrived by a tweet intended to get the nutbars going. Not surprised, but it doesn't matter. The damage is done, and the nutbars will still believe her.
ChiGoose Posted May 9 Posted May 9 1 hour ago, daz28 said: So this was all bs contrived by a tweet intended to get the nutbars going. Not surprised, but it doesn't matter. The damage is done, and the nutbars will still believe her. That’s giving Julie Kelly too much credit. I don’t think this was contrived or intentional. I think she’s just really dumb. 1
daz28 Posted May 9 Posted May 9 7 minutes ago, ChiGoose said: That’s giving Julie Kelly too much credit. I don’t think this was contrived or intentional. I think she’s just really dumb. That's debatable, but I think she's likely clever like trump when it comes to manipulating the uneducated. The nutbars have already turned this lie into, 'It's planted evidence to frame trump'. LOLOL
BillsFanNC Posted May 9 Posted May 9 The King and Daz-stain wallowing in Billsfuk.c's sandbox. How apropos. You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by ChiGoose. Options You've chosen to ignore content by BillStime. Options You've chosen to ignore content by daz28. Options You've chosen to ignore content by ChiGoose. Options You've chosen to ignore content by daz28. Options 1
Recommended Posts