D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 (edited) I would bring in a C/G type from early in draft would conceivably be the long term answer at C or compete with Boettger/ Bates as a rookie. I would also bring in a veteran OG as insurance would can threaten them. In addition, If a potential long term solution at LT became available I'd pull the trigger and move Dawkins to guard. At any rate, I'm also bringing in a veteran T to compete with Brown/Doyle. I'm applying redudancy to the problem. It's too important and has to be solved now. Edited January 27, 2023 by D. L. Hot-Flamethrower 1 Quote
Dont Stop Billeiving Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 5 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Pass blocking grades were somewhat better aside from Bates. Saffold and Brown need to be replaced. Move Bates back to LG. Dawkins - 80.4 Saffold - 50.2 Morse - 70.1 Bates - 61.5 Brown - 53.4 Definitely agree with this, one of the more underrated factors in why the offensive line struggled IMO was the signing of Saffold and the subsequent displacement of Bates from LG to RG. I see what they were trying to do because of Saffold's history at that spot, but think it's easy to see with hindsight that it was the wrong call and wonder how things may have worked out differently with Bates at LG (his best position and with already established chemistry with Dawkins and Morse) and a different FA/draft pick at RG. Hoping that after this offseason, the 2023 offensive line could look something like this: LT- Dion Dawkins LG- Ryan Bates C- Mitch Morse RG- Andrew Vorhees (Day 2 pick out of USC, athletic and powerful run blocker with the versatility to play every spot except center) RT- Andre Dillard (FA signing) or Terence Steele (offer sheet as he's an RFA), somewhat established right tackles in this league that wouldn't cost the moon but could provide more steady play for us in the short term while Spencer Brown hopefully develops further and serves as the swing tackle. With this reshuffled offensive line, I think Josh wouldn't be running for his life nearly as much and our run game would be more consistently productive. The changes/upgrades also don't eat up an unrealistic amount of cap space and by using a Day 2 pick on Vorhees (could see him being 2nd or 3rd round depending on his combine), we still have our first rounder to hopefully add a genuine WR 2 to the offense. Links for the new players: https://thedraftnetwork.com/sr-prospect/andrew-vorhees-52b8ed3b-e751-4935-8255-b90c2fce9da5/ https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/andre-dillard-29057/ https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/terence-steele-48236/ 2 Quote
KOKBILLS Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 4 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said: I’m really curious about their pro personnel evaluation process, including their own self-scouting - who is in charge of it, whether the coaches have input (and how much), etc. They have a really tough time getting it right at a variety of key positions (but not others, like cornerback). They need to figure out why and effing fix it. The entire Organization from Beane down through the Coaching staff needs to re-think many things. But to be perfectly honest, as someone who has lived the NFL Draft and hobby-scouting for over 30 years now, most of it is Beane's Dept...College and Pro. As a Draft nerd some of the misses are really glaring. And the UFA's have been a mixed bag, especially when you consider 2 of the best UFA signings we've have had in the McD era (Poyer and Hyde) came before Beane was in charge. Beane is quite literally living off of Josh and Diggs reputation-wise. 2 1 Quote
78thealltimegreat Posted January 27, 2023 Author Posted January 27, 2023 49 minutes ago, Dont Stop Billeiving said: Definitely agree with this, one of the more underrated factors in why the offensive line struggled IMO was the signing of Saffold and the subsequent displacement of Bates from LG to RG. I see what they were trying to do because of Saffold's history at that spot, but think it's easy to see with hindsight that it was the wrong call and wonder how things may have worked out differently with Bates at LG (his best position and with already established chemistry with Dawkins and Morse) and a different FA/draft pick at RG. Hoping that after this offseason, the 2023 offensive line could look something like this: LT- Dion Dawkins LG- Ryan Bates C- Mitch Morse RG- Andrew Vorhees (Day 2 pick out of USC, athletic and powerful run blocker with the versatility to play every spot except center) RT- Andre Dillard (FA signing) or Terence Steele (offer sheet as he's an RFA), somewhat established right tackles in this league that wouldn't cost the moon but could provide more steady play for us in the short term while Spencer Brown hopefully develops further and serves as the swing tackle. With this reshuffled offensive line, I think Josh wouldn't be running for his life nearly as much and our run game would be more consistently productive. The changes/upgrades also don't eat up an unrealistic amount of cap space and by using a Day 2 pick on Vorhees (could see him being 2nd or 3rd round depending on his combine), we still have our first rounder to hopefully add a genuine WR 2 to the offense. Links for the new players: https://thedraftnetwork.com/sr-prospect/andrew-vorhees-52b8ed3b-e751-4935-8255-b90c2fce9da5/ https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/andre-dillard-29057/ https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/terence-steele-48236/ This isn’t bad Voorhees is terrific but Terrence Steele is coming of an ACL tear and you’d probably have to wait till October for him to see any meaningful action 1 Quote
BillsVet Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 3 hours ago, frostbitmic said: Saffold is the weakest link and needs to be replaced, preferably by a 1st or 2nd round rookie. Brown needs to have some serious competition for his starting job as well. Time to protect Josh and replace the turnstyles. Yeah, everyone and their mother knows the OL needs upgrades, but let's not go back to 2009 by using top draft picks for centers and guards because there was a glaring interior line issue. Use more efficient means to address IOL, focus on the priority positions, and don't waste high picks just to fill a need. Quote
GunnerBill Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 3 hours ago, DJB said: We need a reliable and guaranteed upgrade all along the line no doubt. But Dion is getting moved from LT to G it isn’t happening even though it would be ideal. On the Bills he’s going to play tackle next season He probably is. He wouldn't be if I was running the team. 1 Quote
DJB Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 29 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: He probably is. He wouldn't be if I was running the team. That leaves you with two gaping holes at the tackle positions Quote
GunnerBill Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, DJB said: That leaves you with two gaping holes at the tackle positions No I'd be seeking to bring in a vet and to trade to do it if necessary. Jake Matthews is my target. Him at LT. Dawkins at LG. Morse at C. Bates at RG. I'll try and draft a right tackle. 1 Quote
TheBrownBear Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 Brown showed promise as a rookie and graded out as a physical freak, so I understand why they took the chance of rolling with him this year. I wonder how much of a factor his back injury was in his poor play this year. I know Beane discussed a lack of reps for him in the offseason and training camp, and for a young project like Brown, I can see how that could have led to his stifled development (or outright regression). At a minimum, I think we need to let Saffold walk, move Bates back to left guard where he looked more comfortable in 2021, and draft an OG (rounds 2/3), RT (late day 2, early day 3) and developmental C. Quote
Billz4ever Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, 78thealltimegreat said: D. Dawkins: 73.5 R. Saffold: 43.7 M. Morse: 61.4 R. Bates: 61.8 S. Brown: 51.4 For reference a solid NFL starter has a 70 grade…a pro bowl player has an 80ish grade…an all pro has a high 80s to low 90s grade..Trent Williams has the highest at 93.7 Josh Allen had over 5000 yards of offense and 42 touchdowns and had a PFF grade of 91.6 the highest of any QB with this line which graded out 26th blocking for him. Geez, we paid Saffold $6M to come in and stink up the joint. This is where we were last year. Better across the board. LT Dion Dawkins | 77.5 LG Ike Boettger | 59.8 C Mitch Morse | 63.8 RG Daryl Williams | 67.5 RT Spencer Brown | 62.5 Edited January 27, 2023 by Billz4ever Quote
DJB Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 22 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: No I'd be seeking to bring in a vet and to trade to do it if necessary. Jake Matthews is my target. Him at LT. Dawkins at LG. Morse at C. Bates at RG. I'll try and draft a right tackle. Fair enough but a difficult task for sure Quote
LabattBlue Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 (edited) Two years ago they passed on Creed Humphrey. Last year Tyler Linderbaum. I am not sure if it is Beane or McD behind the aversion to fixing the IOL, but they need to stop with the dumpster diving. It is not working! You have below average OG’s, and an OC whose concussion history is frightening. Then factor in a tub of goo at LT, and a project at RT. If I am Allen, I am pissed. The only gift he should be giving them at Christmas is “OL Play for Dummies”. Edited January 27, 2023 by LabattBlue 3 Quote
Marcus Aurelius Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 Is Beane overrated? My Goodness I think so ... Quote
LABILLBACKER Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 12 hours ago, GunnerBill said: The biggest liability on this team two years straight - offensive line play. Actually it's probably closer to 5 years straight. McD has completely ignored the OL during his tenure while we watch yearly defensive acquisitions blow. 1 Quote
Nextmanup Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 17 hours ago, IronMaidenBills said: Image if we had a couple of all pro linemen how much Allen would destroy the league. It's not that simple, but I agree we need to upgrade the line. You're assuming Josh would turn extra time into completions. Maybe, maybe not. Quote
78thealltimegreat Posted January 27, 2023 Author Posted January 27, 2023 1 hour ago, Nextmanup said: It's not that simple, but I agree we need to upgrade the line. You're assuming Josh would turn extra time into completions. Maybe, maybe not. With no time he had nearly 4300 yards passing what do you want him to do shoot for 5000? Quote
Milanos Milano Posted January 27, 2023 Posted January 27, 2023 1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said: With no time he had nearly 4300 yards passing what do you want him to do shoot for 5000? With more time, he probably could do 5,000 , that’s the amazing thing. 1 Quote
Dr.Sack Posted January 28, 2023 Posted January 28, 2023 Any idea what having 3 OL who grade out in the 80s could do for the 2 lower graded OL? In other words LT 85, LG 60, C 85, RG 60, RT 85. Just so long as the LG & RG could hold up, could their C help make them a bit stouter, or could pulling T's make a double that much more effective. To me the OL cannot have two weak links connected. The LT, RT & C are the most important spots. You can get just average 70s production from competent drafting of college OL. Quote
Freak-O Posted January 28, 2023 Posted January 28, 2023 21 hours ago, Gunsgoodtime said: One of the worst in the league, good job Beane and McDermott. Every bit of this failure is on them. They obviously can't evaluate and draft talent. Look no further than Ford and letting Teller go And every bit of the success the team has had since they took over is also on them. Quote
Chaos Posted January 28, 2023 Posted January 28, 2023 5 hours ago, Nextmanup said: It's not that simple, but I agree we need to upgrade the line. You're assuming Josh would turn extra time into completions. Maybe, maybe not. There must be statisitics on his passer rating with a clean pocket. Pretty easy to extrapolate from that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.