Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, HoofHearted said:

Multiple coverage busts from the Safety position against the Bengals in addition to the very obvious lack of scheme knowledge that our depth safeties possessed cost our defense huge this year.

 

I'm not an X's and O's guy - the only obvious bust I saw was on the opening Chase TD. What else did the safeties mess up that game ? 

Posted
Just now, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

I'm not an X's and O's guy - the only obvious bust I saw was on the opening Chase TD. What else did the safeties mess up that game ? 

The Hurst TD they jumped the screen. Should’ve stood out as well. Plus missed tackles. It was a bad game from Poyer.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

I'm not an X's and O's guy - the only obvious bust I saw was on the opening Chase TD. What else did the safeties mess up that game ? 

The other obvious one was the second touchdown to Hurst when Poyer drove the fast screen to Chase and Hurst ran the stalk and go on him. There were multiple instances of us carrying a player too far vertically and allowing the easy catch and run underneath, or us not switching off routes in a timely manner in our Quarters looks. It was a bad day at the office all around.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

Seems like an odd choice.

 

Given the injuries at the position I thought safeties were one of the few positional groups that didn't let us down over the course of the season or in the Bengals game. 

 

If he was responsible for claiming that Jaquan Johnson was a capable NFL backup safety then I could see the reasoning.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

I'm not an X's and O's guy - the only obvious bust I saw was on the opening Chase TD. What else did the safeties mess up that game ? 

 

Hayden Hurst TD where 3 players including Poyer ran down to the fake Chase screen which left Hurst all alone for an easy TD with Poyer trying to get back in time but failing badly.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Firing the Safeties coach!  That should resolve all the management and coaching deficiencies in the defense, the offensive line, and a poor draft record.  Can the locker room attendants and laundry crew be far behind? 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

 

I'm not an X's and O's guy - the only obvious bust I saw was on the opening Chase TD. What else did the safeties mess up that game ? 

Chase TD looks like Marlowe is at fault.

Posted
Just now, All_Pro_Bills said:

Firing the Safeties coach!  That should resolve all the management and coaching deficiencies in the defense, the offensive line, and a poor draft record.  Can the locker room attendants and laundry crew be far behind? 

It is one of McDermotts boys though. So maybe this is something to show no one is safe.

Posted (edited)

My best guess based on no actual knowledge is that Steve Wilks is coming with Al Holcomb. I would be good with that. Yeah it's more Carolina guys, but they are far from yes men and they know what McDermott wants. Holcomb had a lot to do with the development of Jeremy Chinn as well as Luke Kuechly. 

Edited by MrEpsYtown
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

Seems like an odd choice.

 

Given the injuries at the position I thought safeties were one of the few positional groups that didn't let us down over the course of the season or in the Bengals game. 

Coverage was very odd this year. 

We played a lot more man. But we didn't play Elam much. It made some sense when Johnson and Hamlin were running the backfield. They were just not an NFL pairing. 

But it kept happening even when it was Poyer-Hamlin with Tre and Jackson.

Posted
7 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

My best guess based on no actual knowledge is that Steve Wilks is coming with Al Holcomb. I would be good with that. Yeah it's more Carolina guys, but they are far from yes men and they know what McDermott wants. Holcomb had a lot to do with the development of Jeremy Chinn as well as Luke Kuechly. 

I’d be all for that absolutely 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

It is one of McDermotts boys though. So maybe this is something to show no one is safe.

teams are interviewing for coordinator positions right now. Some good ones out there so if Frazier and Dorsey and still here in next couple of days, they're probably staying

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:

My best guess based on no actual knowledge is that Steve Wilks is coming with Al Holcomb. I would be good with that. Yeah it's more Carolina guys, but they are far from yes men and they know what McDermott wants. Holcomb had a lot to do with the development of Jeremy Chinn as well as Luke Kuechly. 

This would be a nice REALISTIC development (No, Vic Fangio isn't coming here to be a DC).

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...