Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

Boom. Absolutely fantastic.

 

 

 

I don’t always get the part about being “destroyed”, but he sounded both reasoned and reasonable in his reply.
 

Tbh @redtail hawk seems less concerned about the Dems being bounced than he does about McCarthy’s character.   

  • Agree 2
Posted
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don’t always get the part about being “destroyed”, but he sounded both reasoned and reasonable in his reply.
 

Tbh @redtail hawk seems less concerned about the Dems being bounced than he does about McCarthy’s character.   

 

Reporter asks a question, purportedly about Schiff/Swalwell, but framed around a Santos strawman.

 

Speaker McCarthy systematically dismembers said strawman piece by piece with specific examples as to why they are not fit to serve on intel committee.

 

Embarrassed. Owned.  Beat down. Destroyed.  Take your pick, they all apply.

 

@redtail hawk can only be concerned about McCarthy's character because he only deflects when dem malfeasance is highlighted.  It's what he does. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Reporter asks a question, purportedly about Schiff/Swalwell, but framed around a Santos strawman.

 

Speaker McCarthy systematically dismembers said strawman piece by piece with specific examples as to why they are not fit to serve on intel committee.

 

Embarrassed. Owned.  Beat down. Destroyed.  Take your pick, they all apply.

 

@redtail hawk can only be concerned about McCarthy's character because he only deflects when dem malfeasance is highlighted.  It's what he does. 

 

 

I keed, I keed

 

B1FDF337-02F0-40B6-936D-369B516C962D.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Reporter asks a question, purportedly about Schiff/Swalwell, but framed around a Santos strawman.

 

Speaker McCarthy systematically dismembers said strawman piece by piece with specific examples as to why they are not fit to serve on intel committee.

 

Embarrassed. Owned.  Beat down. Destroyed.  Take your pick, they all apply.

 

@redtail hawk can only be concerned about McCarthy's character because he only deflects when dem malfeasance is highlighted.  It's what he does. 

 

 


The little things - lol

 

#winning

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


meow McCarthy sounds kind of unintelligent speaking emotionally here…. How far over his head is he? 

small "victories" have to go a long way for them.  McCarthy is a reptile.  This is a major accomplishment.  How many lizards could pull this off?

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

They are too anti-Putin, so the Rump part of the GOP insisted they have to go. 

 

They promoted a false narrative which divided our nation and weakened our democracy which gives russia and china power. they played right into russia's plan. you see that right?  they sold you a narrative that you bought and now seem to can't admit or just don't want to. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
Posted
13 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

They promoted a false narrative which divided our nation and weakened our democracy which gives russia and china power. they played right into russia's plan. you see that right?  they sold you a narrative that you bought and now seem to can't admit or just don't want to. 

 

:lol:

 

You're joking, right? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

They promoted a false narrative which divided our nation and weakened our democracy which gives russia and china power. they played right into russia's plan. you see that right?  they sold you a narrative that you bought and now seem to can't admit or just don't want to. 

No, they exposed the Trump Putin connection. The out in the open relationship between MAGA and the bloody terrorist dictator 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

it makes sense though. 

 

I was talking about them realizing they got duped.  They don't know and never will know, and that's why that's they keep falling for it.

Edited by Doc
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, they exposed the Trump Putin connection. The out in the open relationship between MAGA and the bloody terrorist dictator 

 

You keep believing the lies they told you despite all this evidence slapping you in the face. the narrative has been debunked

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, aristocrat said:

You keep believing the lies they told you despite all this evidence slapping you in the face. the narrative has been debunked

 

Yeah but how else could Hilly have lost?  

Posted
7 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

 

You keep believing the lies they told you despite all this evidence slapping you in the face. the narrative has been debunked

What evidence? 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yeah but how else could Hilly have lost?  

I bet a Putin FBI agent could tell you exactly how she lost 

 

 

And do you love Wikkileaks? Trump did 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What evidence? 

 

 

I bet a Putin FBI agent could tell you exactly how she lost 

 

 

And do you love Wikkileaks? Trump did 

 

literally every time they opened their mouths. every single time. 

×
×
  • Create New...