Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Billz4ever said:

Just playing Devil's Advocate...

 

I see what you're saying, but if Daboll were promoted to HC, there's probably a good chance Dorsey winds up as OC anyway in that scenario.  I get that Daboll would be there to oversee it all, but it could've worked out that way. 

Sure maybe Dorsey still gets promoted. Idk.
Imo there is absolutely no way that Daboll would have tolerated Dorsey's (and Josh's) style of offence. He would have taken over or drop kicked Dorsey so hard that he would have flown back to Florida without a plane.

Posted
1 minute ago, starrymessenger said:

Sure maybe Dorsey still gets promoted. Idk.
Imo there is absolutely no way that Daboll would have tolerated Dorsey's (and Josh's) style of offence. He would have taken over or drop kicked Dorsey so hard that he would have flown back to Florida without a plane.

I hear you and I do believe Dorsey's playcalling seems like it feeds Josh's bad habits at times.  I think Daboll would certainly do a better job with reeling Josh back in if he gets into that hero ball mindset.

 

I saw this tweet and I found it interesting.

 

Now I know there can be many different factors that go into this, but I can't help but believe Dorsey's playcalling was a major contributing factor here.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
16 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

I hear you and I do believe Dorsey's playcalling seems like it feeds Josh's bad habits at times.  I think Daboll would certainly do a better job with reeling Josh back in if he gets into that hero ball mindset.

 

I saw this tweet and I found it interesting.

 

Now I know there can be many different factors that go into this, but I can't help but believe Dorsey's playcalling was a major contributing factor here.

 

I was originally for Dorsey being promoted as that's who Josh was comfortable with but looking back on it now, I feel like Dorsey is kind of in a position now since being heavily endorsed by him, will never challenge Josh Allen if he notices him start trending the wrong path as far as decision making, mechanics etc.   Josh for better or worse, owns the Buffalo Bills right now figuratively speaking.    Not saying any offensive regression is on Allen but in the case it were, I feel like Daboll was better suited to get it corrected.

  • Agree 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

I hear you and I do believe Dorsey's playcalling seems like it feeds Josh's bad habits at times.  I think Daboll would certainly do a better job with reeling Josh back in if he gets into that hero ball mindset.

 

I saw this tweet and I found it interesting.

 

Now I know there can be many different factors that go into this, but I can't help but believe Dorsey's playcalling was a major contributing factor here.

It took 4 years to ween Josh off the hero ball. Now it's like Josh is addicted again and Ken is his dealer.  God I wish we could somehow get Dabs back as our HC.

  • Agree 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

It took 4 years to ween Josh off the hero ball. Now it's like Josh is addicted again and Ken is his dealer.  God I wish we could somehow get Dabs back as our HC.

The strange part is that at the beginning of the season, it didn't seem like that.  If Josh went deep, good chance it was one-on-one coverage and the receiver had steps on the DB.

 

As the season progressed though, it started feeling like Josh was trying to force the ball into coverage much more often, relying on his arm strength trying to thread the needle and rifle the ball into a window that just wasn't there.  

 

It's like he was having a relapse and couldn't resist the urge.  

Posted
6 hours ago, thenorthremembers said:

So whats your answer then?  Because only 35 coaches in the history of the league have been able to win a Super Bowl.    Coaches of all types havent made it further than McDermott.   Coaches who dont punt, coaches who do punt, coaches who go for it on 4th exclusively, coaches who dont, coaches who throw it every down, coaches who dont, offensive genius, defensive genius.      Only 35 out 518 coaches in the history of the NFL have won a Superbowl.  If I am playing the odds I am keeping the guy who gets you in the dance every year rather than firing him and taking a chance on the fact that I am so smart that I can predict the next Super Bowl winning coach with a 6% chance. 

 

 

 

 

Just watch the league, it's about offense, this Tampa 2, out of touch, but nice guy ain't cutting it. And it's not unprecedented. See Dungy/Gruden Fox/Kubiak. 

Posted

Eagles eagle eagles.

 

fired Andy Reid, a great coach who never won the SB, who went to the chiefs and needed the best QB in the league on a rookie contract to FINALLY get over the hump.

 

eagles hired Doug Peterson and won a SB.

 

then they fired Doug Peterson.

 

now they are inching towards another SB(appearance at least).

 

Eagles prove you can fire a hood coach and get a better one in the process.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted

I love McD, he comes across as a phenomenal person and it is very plain to see why players love playing for him but there is a reason why he was the only coach in the divisional round that came from a defensive background.

 

The bottom line is simple, Josh Allen will have no stability as far as coaching is concerned so long as McD is the HC. If we have a great season next year someone will poach Dorsey from us. Heck if we fired Dorsey and hired Frank Reich to be our OC and we had another great season he would likely be poached also.

 

So long as we have a defensive minded HC we will have no stability on offense and there will be a constant coaching carousel. Don’t hire Frank Reich to be our OC, hire him to be our HC! Or better yet, poach Brian Callahan from the team that brutally kicked our ass in the playoffs.

 

Love McD, good coach, wonderful human being but we need to move on.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
7 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I don't want McDermott fired.  What I want to see is some demonstration of a learning curve where he evolves his thinking and decision making based on experience and learning from similar situations.  Not a HC that keeps making blunders over and over along with being unaware or unwilling to see it and become a better decision maker.

The guy is still a terrible clock and time out manager, as well as red flag “challenger”. He showed glimpses of being able to change personnel in-season early in his tenure. But frankly, not much has changed. He hasn’t. He actually likely takes pride in being a steadfast rock of consistency (like Tonkin). He will go down taking his moral high road and sticking to his guns.

7 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:

It doesn't matter what the coa hing success was before McD. Does it matter that Bill Walsh was great in the past when deciding if Shanahan is good enough for the 49ers to win the SuperBowl. These past comparisons are irrelevant to the decision at hand. 

The decision is would another HC do better with the roster we have now? Or would new coordinators with the same HC do better? What Doug Marrone did or didn't do with the roster he had is irrelevant. 

The timing of McD’s arrival immediately post-drought gives people the impression that he single-handedly saved the damn franchise. The first playoff year was a fluke! Every time after they had Josh Allen.

Posted
7 hours ago, SoMAn said:

We all had high expectations for the Bills this year, and now there’s all the predictable finger pointing, including the ‘fire McDermott’ camp. 
For perspective, look at the pre-McDermott teams that for years won 7 to 9 games annually and never sniffed the playoffs. 
In 6 seasons, the Bills have made the playoffs 5 times, including one season with journeyman QB Tyrod Taylor behind center. 
So, you want McD gone. For further perspective, examine future HOF coach Andy Reid’s history. As a head coach in Philly and KC, how many times did he miss the playoffs or lose in early rounds before getting to and winning a conference championship? 
The Bills somehow won 14 of 18 this season despite of a mountain of adversity. Shouldn’t McDermott get some credit for that? A few short years ago some of us would have given our eye teeth to enjoy a season with that many victories. 
So, you want to throw the baby out with the bath water? Who would you armchair GMs fill the coaching staff with? You’re ready to start over…again?

The culture created by Beane and McDermott has produced an attractive destination for free agents. A good draft, impact signings, and a healthier 2023 might be all that’s needed to get to the promised land. 
Silver lining: the Bills not winning the Super Bowl saved us from a lifetime of NFL Films highlights with the radio broadcast voiceover of Chris Brown screeching “Bills win” 3 octaves higher than a normal speaking voice. 😏

And now some perspective for you... from the year the Bills made the playoffs with Josh Allen vs the Texans, the Bengals had a 1 win season, drafted Joe Burrow, he had reconstructive knee surgery, went to a super bowl and now completely out coached and embarassed the Bills in their own house. 

 

The Bills were bad 8 years ago is not an excuse for someone to keep their job. 

 

The Bills weren't bad because they never had a decent coach, they were bad because they had awful QB play for years and a cheap owner that refused to invest into the team, facilities, staff, infrastructure. Now we have the QB and owner situation resolved but this coach has proven he is not the caliber coach to win in the playoffs, lacks scheme and gameplanning ability, and his style of football does not fit what this team has now become -- he's a tractor tailor driver behind the wheel of a Ferrari. 

 

Also please note Andy Reid did not win a Super Bowl in Philadelphia and the Eagles actually went on to win a Super Bowl after firing him sooner than he ended up winning one with Patrick Mahomes, and now they are both in the conference Chamionships with Siriani lined up as likely coach of the year. 

 

The final straw for McDermott is his continued playoff failures from horrendous game planning/management and decision making. 13 seconds was one of the worst coaching collapses in history, he should have been fired, but instead he got what should be a mercy year this year. There has been zero improvement from him on the playoffs what so ever.

 

We can't hold him to a different standard than the rest of the team and hold the franchise back as a result. This team is the Buffalo Bills, not the Buffalo McDermotts.

 

UntriedEvergreenLice-size_restricted.gif

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Billz4ever said:

The strange part is that at the beginning of the season, it didn't seem like that.  If Josh went deep, good chance it was one-on-one coverage and the receiver had steps on the DB.

 

As the season progressed though, it started feeling like Josh was trying to force the ball into coverage much more often, relying on his arm strength trying to thread the needle and rifle the ball into a window that just wasn't there.  

 

It's like he was having a relapse and couldn't resist the urge.  

I think the lack of dependable targets underneath steered Josh elsewhere. You can only have guys drop it so many times. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, PBF81 said:

 

You raise some interesting points here.  

 

To start, I've always maintained that had our SB era teams had Parcells, Johnson, or Gibbs instead of Levy, we'd have won at least two of those SBs.  Not the Redskins one, they were simply the better team that year, but not so in the other three.  I distinctly recall after halftime of that fourth SB, the one where we led 13-6 at the half, I was at my friend's SB party in West Seneca, and after the half the Cowboys came running out of the tunnel, helmets on, fist-pumping and jacked to play.  

 

Then here come our players, Bruce Smith WALKING out of the tunnel, helmet in hand, looking down at the turf, sloooowly WALKING out onto the field with the rest of the players.  I remember being damn near speechless, looked to my Bills game buddy, and said "This game's over!"  And it was.  We got our asses handed to us 24-0 in the 2nd half.  

 

I distinctly recall the on-field reporters saying what the lockerrooms were like.  The one from the Cowboys locker room said that Jimmy Johnson was swearing up a storm and throwing chairs around.  ... So what was Marv doing?  Apparently, according to them, he was reading Hemmingway (or some famous author) quotes to the team.  Seriously.  I don't think we even need to discuss the rest of the game or why it unfolded as it did.  I mean talking about sedating your team.  

 

McD's a great guy, fantastic guy.  And we went thru an unprecedented circumstance, from which we should have recovered by gameday here.  But at the end of the day, we're not talking about a bunch of guys that get together for a free meal at the end of a long hard work week, to play football to represent their city.  We're talking about paid professionals, very highly paid professionals.  That "family" mentality cannot overcome the professional/team mentality apart from a brief period within which to grieve, as we all had. 

 

We all thought that the Miami game was bad, and I'm sure many of us wrote it off as the "hangover game," which it should have been.  It was for us fans.  But it was McD's job to have this team overcome that for this past game.  He failed, miserably, and it's clearly coaching that set the tone for eveyrone coming out flat.  That Cinci game was the worst game of the season, easily.  So these excuses as to how hard it's been on the team don't resonate well with a lot of fans.  Many of the same fans have unexpressed hardships in their lives too.  Suppose Hamlin has a serious set-back, as his family put out via the media over the weekend, and something worse happens?  Is it going to impact their play next season too?   Everyone has to deal with this in their own way, personally.  I get that the team is a family of sorts, but I'd wager that if we asked Hamlin what he thought of the game as he watched it, he wouldn't be very happy about it.  

 

I get the same exact impression with McD as I got with Marv.  If we had Reid, Taylor, and possibly even Sirianni, Shanahan, Pederson, or even a few others, that we'd be playing better overall football in general.  You watch those teams, particularly Cinci and KC, there's a more methodical approach to them.  We don't have one.  It's entirely shoot-from-the-hip game-planning and tactics, if we can even call them tactics.  Those are terminal issues for a coaching staff, for a team.  They WILL rear their heads every season if not corrected, and we never see any corrections.  As they say, doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results, is the definition of insanity.  But that's what we do, the same thing over and over again.  The drafted players in our F7 are Oliver (1st), Rousseau (1st), Epenesa (2nd), and Basham (2nd).  We can add former 1st Lawson by us too if we want.   By all rights we should have a killer DL, but we don't.  It's average at best.  

 

Last offseason's correction was to assume that all we had to do was to build a team to beat KC.  Well, we see how that turned out.  What's next, spend this offseason watching to see what Cinci does and build the team to singularly beat them?  

 

Good teams, led by good coaches, have a methology that they apply, both in stocking the their teams with talent as well as their approach to game days.  We don't seem to have either.  Our approach in the draft, apparently, is just keep drafting DL-men until we hit on one.  After four seasons, let's pour all of our resources into a 33-year old LB for $60M that's going to hamstring our future, because we obviously don't know what we're doing via the draft, while rolling the dice on a single season.  Wise?   I guess that answer depends upon one's views.  

 

Our approach, we routinely seem to simply try to score as quickly as we can, often ignoring the high-percentage passing approach that would still march us down the field patiently and keep the opposing D on the field.  I know, because we've all seen our guys open in the flats or underneath or even in the backfield, often completely uncovered and ripe for a 8 or 10-yard gain easily in YAC, but we go deep, and often resulting in 3-and-outs,, ... or 4 or 5 play series.  We can't rely on our running game because it's not reliable.  If we don't score, no worries, punt, see what happens, que sera sera, and if they score, oh well, we'll just have to score now too.  Everything's ad hoc.  Granted, some of that is Allen being Allen, but who's in charge, Allen or McD.  

 

At the end of the day, this is what critics realize.  They also realize that those types of approaches are unlikely to lead us to a championship.  So in the same way that a team may give up on a good, but not great QB, or players at other positions that aren't cutting it but not necessarily bad players, so too coaching should be viewed the same way.  But unlike with individual players, not being QBs, coaches get all the credit for winning or conversely losing.  But as we know, without Allen, who carries the team on his shoulders both emotionally as well as on the field, and fair or unfair with my stance being the latter, this team is in the basement of the AFC East.  Without Allen this team is worse than the average "last 20 years team" easily.  What, Diggs and Milano are going to render it even a .500 team?  I don't think so.  

 

The problem is that it takes someone to recognize that, A, and B, be willing to do something about it.  Pegula's relatively hands-off, and who knows how preoccupied he is with his wife's situation, and Beane and McD have an odd relationship given that McD more or less hired Beane, which is bizarre enough.  What's in the contract of each we don't know.  It's difficult to imagine that McD doesn't have unusual authority for a coach, and is Beane really going to fire the guy that gave him the job to begin with since he owes him, dearly, for that opportunity.  

 

There are a lot of dynamics that relate to what you said.  There are some complexities, but at the end of the day, McD doesn't seem to have the ability, or will perhaps, to make the necessary changes, and Beane and the scouts can't seem to put together even average drafts much less the kind of drafts that bring in players like Chase, Higgins, Hubbard, Logan Wilson, etc.  Then we have to rely on free agency, at greater expense, to overcome that lack of solid drafting.  Now we're in cap hell and essentially in rebuild mode.  If Morse and his 6 concussions retires, we're in a real world of hurt.  I'm a little surprised that Allen hasn't succumbed to a significant injury by now.  He's built like a tank.  

 

As a result, it'll probably take missing the playoffs for who, Pegula, to insist that McD ain't cutting it.  It's all business until it isn't business.  

 

 

Agree 95%.  Your comparison of Levy with peer coaches has some similarity;  however, I wonder if some other style of coaching would’ve worked with that cast of characters.  It’s only a maybe that Parcells and Gibbs could’ve gotten a ring.  The present coach is safe and he knows it.  If his job was at risk, he might make some changes.  I don’t see him doing much house cleaning, and he’s the only one who can do it, but he won’t.  He thinks the problem is something other than coaching.  He’s both a players’ coach and a coaches’ coach.  That is the culture he believes in.  No changes.  Just watch.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

I honestly don't think it's having the wrong guy driving the bus.  This team just peaked way too early, got decimated by injuries, then emotionally destroyed, and couldn't  pull it back together.  That's a tall order.   The September bills team wins the Super Bowl hands down.  But obviously that's not when superbowls are won.  And it's also apparent to me this team struggles in the cold weather grind it out kinds of games that you have to play in January in Buffalo.  

 

The Super Bowl winning teams are peaking at the end. We need a power running game that we can go to when it's 10 degrees and a foot of snow.  Give Allen a legit running game and things change.  Im not smart enough to know if that's the line, or the RB, or the coaching (or all of it) - but McDermott/Beane need to figure that out and get a running game.  

Posted
1 hour ago, ArtVandalay said:

And now some perspective for you... from the year the Bills made the playoffs with Josh Allen vs the Texans, the Bengals had a 1 win season, drafted Joe Burrow, he had reconstructive knee surgery, went to a super bowl and now completely out coached and embarassed the Bills in their own house. 

 

The Bills were bad 8 years ago is not an excuse for someone to keep their job. 

 

The Bills weren't bad because they never had a decent coach, they were bad because they had awful QB play for years and a cheap owner that refused to invest into the team, facilities, staff, infrastructure. Now we have the QB and owner situation resolved but this coach has proven he is not the caliber coach to win in the playoffs, lacks scheme and gameplanning ability, and his style of football does not fit what this team has now become -- he's a tractor tailor driver behind the wheel of a Ferrari. 

 

Also please note Andy Reid did not win a Super Bowl in Philadelphia and the Eagles actually went on to win a Super Bowl after firing him sooner than he ended up winning one with Patrick Mahomes, and now they are both in the conference Chamionships with Siriani lined up as likely coach of the year. 

 

The final straw for McDermott is his continued playoff failures from horrendous game planning/management and decision making. 13 seconds was one of the worst coaching collapses in history, he should have been fired, but instead he got what should be a mercy year this year. There has been zero improvement from him on the playoffs what so ever.

 

We can't hold him to a different standard than the rest of the team and hold the franchise back as a result. This team is the Buffalo Bills, not the Buffalo McDermotts.

 

UntriedEvergreenLice-size_restricted.gif

I'll suggest without Josh Allen and his Superman impersonation this Bills team is a 6 or 7 win roster and organization.  While McDermott the person seems like a good guy Sean the coach has some shortcomings that experience isn't eliminating.  A bold move from ownership is needed.  But unlikely to happen.

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Pirate Angel said:

Dorsey needs to go, his play calling is very "maddenish" with no attempt to commit to the running game or get our backs involved. 

 

Dorsey was a prolific legendary QB at The U.  Sometimes I wonder whether he's trying to be the same QB vicariously through Allen.  I realize that's odd, but then again that's how he seems to call games, exactly as if he's playing a video game.  

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...