Billznut Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 I in no way want to trade Diggs. But why in the world would you pay him top 5-7 WR money and then not use him? And there was way more than today that they didn’t use him like a true #1 receiver should be used. Keep Diggs, find a better OC that can scheme plays for him to excel. Most of Diggs’s receptions this year were smaller gains. Not a lot of big gaining plays. And definitely ignored in far too many games. Quote
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 I stopped reading at trade Josh, who still is the best QB in the league but this offense relies too much on him. We need a better line and better WRs and this offense is rolling again. Trading diggs would be dumb, we need more good WRs not less. Also need to play tighter defense and not let every team roll down the field until we figure it out, cant give up easy touchdowns to the good teams 1 1 Quote
Big Blitz Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said: I stopped reading at trade Josh, who still is the best QB in the league but this offense relies too much on him. We need a better line and better WRs and this offense is rolling again. Trading diggs would be dumb, we need more good WRs not less. Also need to play tighter defense and not let every team roll down the field until we figure it out, cant give up easy touchdowns to the good teams In 2023, if you’re in the playoffs you should have a good to great offense. On defense you should much rather be good with them scoring quick on a deep shot depending what’s going on in the game - at least you are aggressive - at least it didn’t take too much time - you get the ball back quicker. And you answer back. It’s the philosophy. Philosophy on defense has to change. We can still play a 2 deep shell at times or be willing to let them dink and dunk - but against accurate QBS it is literally the worst defense to play and that’s why the Bengals were confident they would expose us. Ravens play elite man coverage and get after the QB. I think that’s how defenses want to play. Edited January 23, 2023 by Big Blitz Quote
John from Riverside Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 19 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Davis is a potential trade piece - could see trading Davis and the 27th to move up to snag a WR we like. Then trade a 2nd for Hopkins. We’ll have the money because I’m not resigning Poyer or Oliver. Btw I’m not saying I would do that but I’m listening and looking. It’s not the draft compensation for Hopkins that’s the problem it’s the salary. I don’t care how much the salary cap goes up. We don’t have the money to go after high price free agents. 1 Quote
reddogblitz Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 I'm definitely against dumping Diggs. We could get more from Diggs if we had another sure handed stud on the other side and a serious threat of a run game. I suggest signing Josh Jacobs and getting the football in his hands 20+ times a game. We're too one dimensional IMHO. Quote
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: In 2023, if you’re in the playoffs you should have a good to great offense. On defense you should much rather be good with them scoring quick on a deep shot depending what’s going on in the game - at least you are aggressive - at least it didn’t take too much time - you get the ball back quicker. And you answer back. It’s the philosophy. Philosophy on defense has to change. We can still play a 2 deep shell at times or be willing to let them dink and dunk - but against accurate QBS it is literally the worst defense to play and that’s why the Bengals were confident they would expose us. Ravens play elite man coverage and get after the QB. I think that’s how defenses want to play. i agree 100% the defensive philosophy is WAY TOO PASSIVE. i want Schwartz back but i believe he just went to Detroit, but hopefully Frazier goes and we get a more aggressive system in here. 1 Quote
MAJBobby Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 How about instead of Diggs. You use your 1st. Draft a Rookie WR. Put him out at WR2 and get Allen some weapons. then in rounds 2,3,4,5,6 OL 2 1 1 Quote
Dr.Sack Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 We could also trade Allen to Bears for Fields and their #1 pick and next years 1st. 😂 2 Quote
John from Riverside Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 44 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: How about instead of Diggs. You use your 1st. Draft a Rookie WR. Put him out at WR2 and get Allen some weapons. then in rounds 2,3,4,5,6 OL Let’s see how the draft falls After today, my appreciation of positions has opened wide up Quote
PrimeTime101 Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, BarleyNY said: And only $37.6M in dead cap…….plus the cost of his replacement. that is if you dump him. You trade it goes to the next team. Now Unless diggs wants out I am not with this but, his cap will follow him Quote
Big Turk Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, Dr.Sack said: We could also trade Allen to Bears for Fields and their #1 pick and next years 1st. 😂 Yes let's trade Allen and Diggs for a bunch of draft picks and hope we strike gold again and likely come nowhere close to what we already have 1 Quote
Dr.Sack Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 Just now, Big Turk said: Yes let's trade Allen and Diggs for a bunch of draft picks and hope we strike gold again and likely come nowhere close to what we already have Beane is on a 4 year draft drought so he’s do for a 4 year hot streak. Quote
PauleeeWalnuts Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) Trade Diggs and go to a ground game with JA as your quarterback….🤦🏻♂️ Edited January 23, 2023 by PaulieYayo Quote
Big Turk Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 Just now, PaulieYayo said: Trade Diggs and go to a ground game with JA as your quarterback….🤦🏻♂️ I mean it sounds good when you are 14 beers into a case... 2 Quote
Goin Breakdown Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 I could have gone to bed but first I felt the need to say this is such a bad idea. Quote
1ManRaid Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 Diggs isn't the reason we're doing draw plays on 1st and 20 down multiple scores, or overthrowing receivers all day. Quote
1ManRaid Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, PrimeTime101 said: that is if you dump him. You trade it goes to the next team. Now Unless diggs wants out I am not with this but, his cap will follow him No, we still carry dead cap if we trade him. Amount depends on if it's a pre-June 1 or post-June 1 designated trade. 1 Quote
BobbyC81 Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 6 hours ago, Draconator said: There's been talk of this. Reported here... Enough with the freakin’ Peter Pan! It’s not funny. It’s stupid! 1 Quote
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 4 hours ago, Big Turk said: I mean it sounds good when you are 14 beers into a case... See if you can somehow work Ertz into the equation, will ya'? Maybe send Arizona a few new video games for Kyler's gaming system. 1 Quote
Solomon Grundy Posted January 23, 2023 Posted January 23, 2023 6 hours ago, Mr. WEO said: The Bills have a better run game than the Chiefs right now. The Chiefs Offense is more lopsided than the Bills, and is based on one player. Maybe the Chiefs should trade Kelce for more assets to rebuild their Offense so that it is more balanced. lol. wtf I would've loved to have had Pacheco and McKinnon in Buffalo's backfield yesterday. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.