Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

And yes, I know exactly who I'm talking about and I don't trust ANY of them, especially when it comes to wealth distribution. Our lobbying laws are an abomination and enable the rich to get richer as they siphon off dollars from the rest of us. Lobbying enables them to make a ROI like nothing the world has ever seen. It's a national disgrace. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
17 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Are you a billionaire who hangs out on a BB political mb every day? There are the wealthy and the poor. If you don't know which you are, it is the latter.

So Gene, you trust the system as it is NOW? Including the thousands of pages of tax code? As I’ve said, I’m not actually in favor of a national sales tax. It unevenly taxes those who spend almost of their monthly income on purchases. But….do you ever question your local sales tax? Nope. You just pay it. Everyone does. Why? Because there are little to no loopholes. Put another way; you’re swimming in water and don’t even realize you’re wet. 😉

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You lost me at MORALLY

 

You were lost morally long before reading my reply !

 

Oh and you laugh at Tenn. being a go to state both for those leaving other states & businesses moving here do some research num nuts & you'll see Tenn. is in a much better place fiscally than any states that you think are doing better or have your support like those i mentioned & after words let me know your findings .

 

I remember a day standing at a check out in Walmart 2 people had just moved from Cali & had said - "We had to get out of Cali the gov't there is so screwed up & we can no longer afford to live there due to the high taxes & gas prices we looked & Tenn. was one of the best states to move to" .

 

Which now because of so many people wanting to move here the prices of real-estate & rent is out rageous & people are now looking to move out side of the Nashville area but i believe that is in part a lot to do with the greed of developers charging prices well above what properties a really worth .

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, T master said:

 

You were lost morally long before reading my reply !

 

Oh and you laugh at Tenn. being a go to state both for those leaving other states & businesses moving here do some research num nuts & you'll see Tenn. is in a much better place fiscally than any states that you think are doing better or have your support like those i mentioned & after words let me know your findings .

 

I remember a day standing at a check out in Walmart 2 people had just moved from Cali & had said - "We had to get out of Cali the gov't there is so screwed up & we can no longer afford to live there due to the high taxes & gas prices we looked & Tenn. was one of the best states to move to" .

 

Which now because of so many people wanting to move here the prices of real-estate & rent is out rageous & people are now looking to move out side of the Nashville area but i believe that is in part a lot to do with the greed of developers charging prices well above what properties a really worth .

 

Yeah, I have family that moved to Tennessee last month. They checked out the local schools and saw how nuts they are about banning books and decided to home school their children.

 

Hugging Sea Horse Book Is Too Racy For Schools

 

Priorities.

 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So Gene, you trust the system as it is NOW? Including the thousands of pages of tax code? As I’ve said, I’m not actually in favor of a national sales tax. It unevenly taxes those who spend almost of their monthly income on purchases. But….do you ever question your local sales tax? Nope. You just pay it. Everyone does. Why? Because there are little to no loopholes. Put another way; you’re swimming in water and don’t even realize you’re wet. 😉

 

Aboso-effing-loutely NOT. Do you think that changes to the system, as proposed by billionaires and big money lobbying interests, are likely proposed to help the poor/middle class or to further enrich the wealthy? I'll hang up and listen.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Aboso-effing-loutely NOT. Do you think that changes to the system, as proposed by billionaires and big money lobbying interests, are likely proposed to help the poor/middle class or to further enrich the wealthy? I'll hang up and listen.

So here’s the thing, if you’ll actually listen. All EVERYONE really cares about is their take home pay. This is true whether you are rich, poor, or somewhere in the middle. If we evolve to a national sales tax, which I don’t support, everyone’s take home pay would evolve to compensate for the significant change in our system. Would it be done without a ton of jabbering…nope. But it would evolve.  Once again, you pay a local sales tax every single day and you don’t give it a moments thought. You just pay it. Why? Because over time it’s become part of the built-in American taxation system. 
 

And for what it’s worth, the reason we have the system we have now is NOT to benefit the rich! It’s to allow the political class to hold power over the electorate by using the tax rates as campaign fodder.

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Yeah, I have family that moved to Tennessee last month. They checked out the local schools and saw how nuts they are about banning books and decided to home school their children.

 

Hugging Sea Horse Book Is Too Racy For Schools

 

Priorities.

 

 

 

As i said your morality is short sighted to say the least !! Seeing as you or your family are so short sighted & can not see the implications of this or what types of questions innocent children could ask because of this type of book i'll just leave it right here because neither you or your family have a clue !! 

 

It's apparent your boundaries are much different from those with higher moral standards for the children they raise & then we wonder why society has went straight to hell in a hand basket .

 

This is a starting point of such things & goes right along with those that want no gender assignments at birth & think it's okay for young kids to decide before they are of a age that they can make a responsible adult like & moral decision that can totally change their future .

 

This which you will never see or understand is the beginning of indoctrination of young children minds rather than letting them just be children & play with blocks or ride tricycles .

 

So please don't move to Tenn. stay in you liberal state & state of mind where you are at because we here in Tenn. don't need you to come here & change the direction of this state to be the same as your interpretation of what is good . 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, T master said:

 

As i said your morality is short sighted to say the least !! Seeing as you or your family are so short sighted & can not see the implications of this or what types of questions innocent children could ask because of this type of book i'll just leave it right here because neither you or your family have a clue !! 

 

It's apparent your boundaries are much different from those with higher moral standards for the children they raise & then we wonder why society has went straight to hell in a hand basket .

 

This is a starting point of such things & goes right along with those that want no gender assignments at birth & think it's okay for young kids to decide before they are of a age that they can make a responsible adult like & moral decision that can totally change their future .

 

This which you will never see or understand is the beginning of indoctrination of young children minds rather than letting them just be children & play with blocks or ride tricycles .

 

So please don't move to Tenn. stay in you liberal state & state of mind where you are at because we here in Tenn. don't need you to come here & change the direction of this state to be the same as your interpretation of what is good . 

What’s really funny is that according to BillStime, his family members left the school because of a book that was NOT in the library. Couldn’t they have just gotten that book for their children on their own? Now they have to buy them ALL the books, even the ones that ARE in the school library. Oh well. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, T master said:

 

As i said your morality is short sighted to say the least !! Seeing as you or your family are so short sighted & can not see the implications of this or what types of questions innocent children could ask because of this type of book i'll just leave it right here because neither you or your family have a clue !! 

 

It's apparent your boundaries are much different from those with higher moral standards for the children they raise & then we wonder why society has went straight to hell in a hand basket .

 

This is a starting point of such things & goes right along with those that want no gender assignments at birth & think it's okay for young kids to decide before they are of a age that they can make a responsible adult like & moral decision that can totally change their future .

 

This which you will never see or understand is the beginning of indoctrination of young children minds rather than letting them just be children & play with blocks or ride tricycles .

 

So please don't move to Tenn. stay in you liberal state & state of mind where you are at because we here in Tenn. don't need you to come here & change the direction of this state to be the same as your interpretation of what is good . 

 

Were you educated in Tennessee?

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So here’s the thing, if you’ll actually listen. All EVERYONE really cares about is their take home pay. This is true whether you are rich, poor, or somewhere in the middle. If we evolve to a national sales tax, which I don’t support, everyone’s take home pay would evolve to compensate for the significant change in our system. Would it be done without a ton of jabbering…nope. But it would evolve.  Once again, you pay a local sales tax every single day and you don’t give it a moments thought. You just pay it. Why? Because over time it’s become part of the built-in American taxation system. 
 

And for what it’s worth, the reason we have the system we have now is NOT to benefit the rich! It’s to allow the political class to hold power over the electorate by using the tax rates as campaign fodder.

 

Just like everyone's pay will eventually catch up to the inflation caused by the massive amount of dollars printed since 2020. In the meantime, suffering. The people most affected by these insane policies are not the people who implemented them. The people who implemented them are profiting now. It sounds like you're saying "Hey, it'll all work out. Trust the process. Trust the people in charge." Sorry, I don't. At all.

 

I agree with your second point.

Posted
14 minutes ago, T master said:

 

As i said your morality is short sighted to say the least !! Seeing as you or your family are so short sighted & can not see the implications of this or what types of questions innocent children could ask because of this type of book i'll just leave it right here because neither you or your family have a clue !! 

 

It's apparent your boundaries are much different from those with higher moral standards for the children they raise & then we wonder why society has went straight to hell in a hand basket .

 

This is a starting point of such things & goes right along with those that want no gender assignments at birth & think it's okay for young kids to decide before they are of a age that they can make a responsible adult like & moral decision that can totally change their future .

 

This which you will never see or understand is the beginning of indoctrination of young children minds rather than letting them just be children & play with blocks or ride tricycles .

 

So please don't move to Tenn. stay in you liberal state & state of mind where you are at because we here in Tenn. don't need you to come here & change the direction of this state to be the same as your interpretation of what is good . 

When you get right down to it the debate isn't so much about what books get approved or banned.  It comes down to who gets to decide which is which.  Until recently school boards and educators such as teachers had free reign to decide.  And then parents got involved, raised their concerns and objections, organized and then began to get some say which resulted in the transfer of control and power to make those choices of the hands of schools and districts.  What the people supporting the schools and districts, and in most cases they're liberal educators or their supporters, are really pissing and moaning about isn't in opposition to some form of censorship.  They're mad because power has been taken away from them.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Posted
1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

When you get right down to it the debate isn't so much about what books get approved or banned.  It comes down to who gets to decide which is which.  Until recently school boards and educators such as teachers had free reign to decide.  And then parents got involved, raised their concerns and objections, organized and then began to get some say which resulted in the transfer of control and power to make those choices of the hands of schools and districts.  What the people supporting the schools and districts, and in most cases they're liberal educators or their supporters, are really pissing and moaning about isn't in opposition to some form of censorship.  They're mad because power has been taken away from them.  

 

🤡

Posted
8 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Just like everyone's pay will eventually catch up to the inflation caused by the massive amount of dollars printed since 2020. In the meantime, suffering. The people most affected by these insane policies are not the people who implemented them. The people who implemented them are profiting now. It sounds like you're saying "Hey, it'll all work out. Trust the process. Trust the people in charge." Sorry, I don't. At all.

 

I agree with your second point.

As I keep saying, I’m not in favor of this idea, but to think that everything else in our system will just the same is ridiculous. It obviously won’t. For starters, the entire tax code would evaporate, and with it, all the exemptions (loopholes) deductions, etc. So would all the pitting of one group against another. Think about it…..Have you ever heard ANYONE speak out against their ‘fair share’ when they buy a power tool at Home Depot? I never have. You just pay it, whether you’re rich or poor. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

As I keep saying, I’m not in favor of this idea, but to think that everything else in our system will just the same is ridiculous. It obviously won’t. For starters, the entire tax code would evaporate, and with it, all the exemptions (loopholes) deductions, etc. So would all the pitting of one group against another. Think about it…..Have you ever heard ANYONE speak out against their ‘fair share’ when they buy a power tool at Home Depot? I never have. You just pay it, whether you’re rich or poor. 

 

If you're not in favor of it, why defend it?

 

Do you believe that any radically-different tax system implemented by our paid-for leaders will be fairer? I certainly don't. It's funny to me reading this when the Libs are usually the ones painted as trusting idealists.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Gene Frenkle said:

 

If you're not in favor of it, why defend it?

 

Do you believe that any radically-different tax system implemented by our paid-for leaders will be fairer? I certainly don't. It's funny to me reading this when the Libs are usually the ones painted as trusting idealists.

I’m not defending it. I’m explaining it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’m not defending it. I’m explaining it. 

 

I don't need an explanation. I understand how they will spin it to make it seem fair and palatable for the masses. We won't know how we're getting screwed until long after the fact. Like I said, I don't trust any of them, simple as that.

Posted
3 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said:

Inflation is raging. The Fed has continued to print dollars at an alarming rate. Salaries have not caught up to inflated prices.

 

M1.jpg

 

So they want us to pay 30% on inflated prices instead of being taxed on our incomes, which are relatively deflated as more dollars are printed. As per usual, the 99% get screwed while the 1% presumably find ways around paying the new 30% sales tax? Call me a cynic,, but I feel like the average American is yet again taking it up the arse here. Thanks, old rich white guys!

 

What am I missing here?


other than missing that rich people buy a lot of stuff? A lot more stuff than poor people.

 

it is funny how viscerally opposed the lazy leaching, net consuming Americans are to such a concept. 
 

What? Instead of disincentivizing production and earning with taxation, penalize the people shoving Big Macs into their gullet over of making their own food??? 
 

deter buying a bunch of junk that ends up in a landfill?? 
 

make it more costly to own 50 pairs of shoes? 
 

that’s not ‘merikuh… 

oh the horror. The lazy and degenerate net takers have no issue with productivity being taxed… but don’t take muh stuff! 
 

I’m interested in the idea of a consumption tax structure, instead of supporting a bunch of deadbeats with my income, responsible spending habits and decisions would actually be rewarded with less taxation… Im in

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


other than missing that rich people buy a lot of stuff? A lot more stuff than poor people.

 

it is funny how viscerally opposed the lazy leaching, net consuming Americans are to such a concept. 
 

What? Instead of disincentivizing production and earning with taxation, penalize the people shoving Big Macs into their gullet over of making their own food??? 
 

deter buying a bunch of junk that ends up in a landfill?? 
 

make it more costly to own 50 pairs of shoes? 
 

that’s not ‘merikuh… 

oh the horror. The lazy and degenerate net takers have no issue with productivity being taxed… but don’t take muh stuff! 
 

I’m interested in the idea of a consumption tax structure, instead of supporting a bunch of deadbeats with my income, responsible spending habits and decisions would actually be rewarded with less taxation… Im in

 

 

Man - you sound like a communist.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/19/2023 at 10:20 AM, Tiberius said:

No, red states leach off of the productive states. The rural

areas of this country are really poor, in many instances. 

That at a minimum a partial fallacy.  Let's use NYS as an example.  These were NYS top 10 exports in 2021.  

  1. Gold: US$14.7 billion (16.3% of New York’s total exports) - my notes this is the NY Fed & NYMEX
  2. Diamonds (unmounted): $9.6 billion (10.6%) - my notes this is the diamond district in Manhattan
  3. Hand-drawn paintings, drawings: $4.5 billion (5%)
  4. Jewelry articles clad in precious metal: $3.9 billion (4.3%)
  5. Rubies, sapphires, emeralds: $1.3 billion (1.4%)
  6. Silver: $1.137 billion (1.3%)- my notes this is the NYMEX
  7. Parts of assembly machinery: $1.135 billion (1.3%)
  8. Aircraft including engines, parts: $1.06 billion (1.2%)
  9. Integrated circuits (processors/controllers): $1.01 billion (1.1%)
  10. Original sculptures, statues: $911.8 million (1%)

Here's Kansas 2021 as an example:

  1. Aircraft, aircraft parts including engines: US$2.1 billion (16.7% of Kansas’ exports)
  2. Beef (boneless, fresh/chilled): $1.1 billion (8.6%)
  3. Soybeans: $607.3 million (4.8%)
  4. Corn: $583.7 million (4.7%)
  5. Wheat, meslin: $500.5 million (4%)
  6. Beef (boneless, frozen): $472.9 million (3.8%)
  7. Grain sorghum: $379.9 million (3%)
  8. Ethyl alcohol, other denatured spirits: $232.9 million (1.9%)
  9. Dog and cat food for retail sale: $214.6 million (1.7%)
  10. Modems, similar reception/transmission devices: $155.8 million (1.2%)

 

 

NYS is a great example of a financialized economy where not much in terms of real good is produced.  Kansas is not.  Which has more "value"?


 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

That at a minimum a partial fallacy.  Let's use NYS as an example.  These were NYS top 10 exports in 2021.  

  1. Gold: US$14.7 billion (16.3% of New York’s total exports) - my notes this is the NY Fed & NYMEX
  2. Diamonds (unmounted): $9.6 billion (10.6%) - my notes this is the diamond district in Manhattan
  3. Hand-drawn paintings, drawings: $4.5 billion (5%)
  4. Jewelry articles clad in precious metal: $3.9 billion (4.3%)
  5. Rubies, sapphires, emeralds: $1.3 billion (1.4%)
  6. Silver: $1.137 billion (1.3%)- my notes this is the NYMEX
  7. Parts of assembly machinery: $1.135 billion (1.3%)
  8. Aircraft including engines, parts: $1.06 billion (1.2%)
  9. Integrated circuits (processors/controllers): $1.01 billion (1.1%)
  10. Original sculptures, statues: $911.8 million (1%)

Here's Kansas 2021 as an example:

  1. Aircraft, aircraft parts including engines: US$2.1 billion (16.7% of Kansas’ exports)
  2. Beef (boneless, fresh/chilled): $1.1 billion (8.6%)
  3. Soybeans: $607.3 million (4.8%)
  4. Corn: $583.7 million (4.7%)
  5. Wheat, meslin: $500.5 million (4%)
  6. Beef (boneless, frozen): $472.9 million (3.8%)
  7. Grain sorghum: $379.9 million (3%)
  8. Ethyl alcohol, other denatured spirits: $232.9 million (1.9%)
  9. Dog and cat food for retail sale: $214.6 million (1.7%)
  10. Modems, similar reception/transmission devices: $155.8 million (1.2%)

 

 

NYS is a great example of a financialized economy where not much in terms of real good is produced.  Kansas is not.  Which has more "value"?


 

Everything needs finance to be successful 

 

Period 

×
×
  • Create New...