VABills Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 I could give a flying !@#$ what your lemming ass "thinks." You've proven yet again that you are pretty much what you accuse those on the other side of the aisle of being. 25686[/snapback] The Kennedy democrats and their motto is, "Do as I say, not as I do".
Mickey Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 These are difficult issues to discuss when there is a gaping black hole at the center of the controversey: Where did CBS get those documents? We know nothing of where they came from. All they said was that "CBS has obtained..." so-and-so's documents from his personal files. CBS could end up between a rock and a real hard place. They may need to reveal the source to either establish the authenticity of the documents or to exonerate itself from responsibility for a hoax. They would face a choice between protecting their source and defending themselves. Crazy stuff. I just hope it is all vetted before the election and not after. If they are fakes then I hope that is unquestioningly determined before the election as well as who is responsible. If they are genuine, same thing. Certainly this has little to do with who should be President but still, you can't help but be drawn in to the theatre of it all.
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 I could give a flying !@#$ what your lemming ass "thinks." 25686[/snapback] You'd never know that from your posts.
Alaska Darin Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 You'd never know that from your posts. 25699[/snapback] Look, another lemming from the "Fraternal Order Of LiberalS" who has little cognitive reasoning skill. Knock me over with a feather.
RkFast Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 Hypocrisy works both ways. You took the Swifties' word as gospel and effectively dismissed as "mindless" anyone who didn't. Wait one second...by not considering these allegations as true right now and reserving judgement until they are proven to be real or bogus, we are giving YOU (meaning the Left and the Kerry Campaign and CBS) the benefit of the doubt! How is that hypocritical??
stuckincincy Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 It seems that The American Spectator has on their web site, some words from CBS saying that the documents were given to them by the Kerry campaign. The site is jammed - I couldn't get in, so this is just hearsay.
erynthered Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 It seems that The American Spectator has on their web site, some words from CBS saying that the documents were given to them by the Kerry campaign. The site is jammed - I couldn't get in, so this is just hearsay. 25718[/snapback] I had just heard that on the radio. The story is continuing to unfold. Dan Rather is becoming the story too.
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 It seems that The American Spectator has on their web site, some words from CBS saying that the documents were given to them by the Kerry campaign. The site is jammed - I couldn't get in, so this is just hearsay. 25718[/snapback] Not the American Spectator? That bastion of evenhanded journalism edited by that famed non-partisan Pulitzer winner R. Emmett Tyrell Jr. and published by that great liberal conglomerate Regnery Publishing? THAT American Spectator? Jesus.
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 I had just heard that on the radio. The story is continuing to unfold. Dan Rather is becoming the story too. 25723[/snapback] "On the radio." Who's "on the radio" right now? Rush? Savage?
stuckincincy Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 Not the American Spectator? That bastion of evenhanded journalism edited by that famed non-partisan Pulitzer winner R. Emmett Tyrell Jr. and published by that great liberal conglomerate Regnery Publishing? THAT American Spectator? Jesus. 25724[/snapback] I see. Are those paranoid people STILL chasing you?
VABills Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 Not the American Spectator? That bastion of evenhanded journalism edited by that famed non-partisan Pulitzer winner R. Emmett Tyrell Jr. and published by that great liberal conglomerate Regnery Publishing? THAT American Spectator? Jesus. 25724[/snapback] That anything like CBS, 60 Minutes, Dan Rather and their fair reporting of the facts and "all" the facts?
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 That anything like CBS, 60 Minutes, Dan Rather and their fair reporting of the facts and "all" the facts? 25748[/snapback] In fact, no.
erynthered Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 "On the radio." Who's "on the radio" right now? Rush? Savage? 25728[/snapback] um, news at the bottom of the hour on 102.5. Its an oldies station officer.
VABills Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 In fact, no. 25751[/snapback] Why? Because you the fair and balanced moron who considers all the facts before you decide, have decided so? Yeah, and I bet you still believe Clinton didn't have sex in the Whitehouse.
MichFan Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 BRH's dream world: - CBS documents are real - SBVT have no credibility Mainstream America's reality: - it's looking pretty embarrasing for CBS and the DNC right now - 250 Swifties can't be wrong about everything, Kerry's retreating and changing stories mean something's up
PastaJoe Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 250 Swifties can't be wrong about everything No, but they can be wrong on the specific charges they've made that contradict the eyewitness accounts of those who served ON THE SAME BOAT as Kerry and WHO WERE SAVED by Kerry, as opposed to those who "served with Kerry" by just being in Vietnam at the same time.
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 No, but they can be wrong on the specific charges they've made that contradict the eyewitness accounts of those who served ON THE SAME BOAT as Kerry and WHO WERE SAVED by Kerry, as opposed to those who "served with Kerry" by just being in Vietnam at the same time. 25837[/snapback] Exactly. And just to prove they can't be wrong on everything, they're right about at least one thing -- they all say John Kerry went to Vietnam.
RkFast Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 John Kerry went to Vietnam. BIG !@#$ING DEAL What has he done lately? Since....oh....1973??!!??
BRH Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 BIG !@#$ING DEAL What has he done lately? Since....oh....1973??!!?? 25894[/snapback] Let's see. Up until about 1986 he was snorting coke and/or getting loaded with regularity, all the while engaging in a series of failed businesses for which the money was put up by Daddy's friends. Then he found Jesus, who told him to trade Sammy Sosa and bilk the Texas taxpayers into publicly financing a stadium boondoggle. Then he got elected governor in a state where the governor's biggest responsibility is signing death warrants. Then he became president and sat paralyzed for seven minutes while the nation was under attack, after which he flew to Nebraska at the vice president's order. Then he cut Daddy's taxes and increased spending. Oh and he went to war on false pretenses and claimed victory by taking a 30-mile flight on a fighter, after which several hundred more American troops died and continue to die. Oh my bad. That's the other guy. How about: went to law school, became a prosecutor, became lieutenant governor, and was elected to four terms in the United States Senate?
RkFast Posted September 10, 2004 Posted September 10, 2004 Nice talking points, Mike. Now give the kid his hat back.
Recommended Posts