Jump to content

We're on to Cincinnati(Bengals coming to OP). Sunday 1/22 at 3pm. Opening Line Bills -5


Recommended Posts

Posted

After watching Baltimore v Cincinnati would it make sense to play 3DL and 3 LBs and 5 DBs?  Flood short zone passes with hands and date them to run Mixon?

Posted
15 hours ago, FrenchConnection said:

Go watch this video and tell me that you don't want to beat the heck out of this cocky team on Sunday. 

https://www.bengals.com/video/wild-card-game-balls-locker-room-celebration-2023

 

I see absolutely noting objectionable in this video. It's just a team that, rightly, is confident in itself—they have to have an attitude, some degree of arrogance, to win. The Bills are absolutely no different. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, FrenchConnection said:

Unless you're Tre White. That PI call that extended the Fins sole long drive was weak, especially given all that they let go throughout the game. 

How about the one against the Bengals the 1st play (I think) couple weeks ago when Burrow went long to Chase...that one was a questionable flag too imo

Posted
Just now, PaattMaann said:

 

it didnt hit him directly in the numbers?

I just went back to the dvr to watch because the highlights I found on youtube only show the live feed angle and moves on.

 

On the game broadcast, they show a replay that shows the defender making a great play on the ball by getting his arm/hand in there at the exact time Beasley is thinking he is about to make the grab.

 

Romo comments that he thinks the defender got away with a hold, but that could not be seen on the game broadcast views imo. 

 

All I know is that I do not blame Beasley (unless someone wants to say he could've come back to the ball).

 

I don't know enough or am not smart enough to tell if Josh should've thrown it or not. Might just be a defender making a great play and an unlucky bounce into another defenders arms. Or maybe the defender used illegal holding to make the play. Idk. 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dr. K said:

I see absolutely noting objectionable in this video. It's just a team that, rightly, is confident in itself—they have to have an attitude, some degree of arrogance, to win. The Bills are absolutely no different. 

If you're around it on a daily basis, that "they gotta play us" BS starts to get old really quickly. And the way that Zach Taylor just blows off a pretty bad performance as "AFC North football" is something that McDermott didn't do in his post-game speech. The Bills are "humble and hungry." The Bengals are "salty and hungry." For years the answer to "Who Dey" was "pretty much everybody."

Posted
6 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

How about the one against the Bengals the 1st play (I think) couple weeks ago when Burrow went long to Chase...that one was a questionable flag too imo

 

Agree, I thought at the time that was ticky-tack and I said "Well, OK, but if that's how you're gonna call it, just call it that way on both sides"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

unless someone wants to say he could've come back to the ball

He absolutely could have and should have come back to the ball. It was a tight throw for sure, but I didnt see any clearly better options on the throw. But he should have worked back to Josh.

Posted
Just now, Beck Water said:

 

Agree, I thought at the time that was ticky-tack and I said "Well, OK, but if that's how you're gonna call it, just call it that way on both sides"

And Burrow pulled a Brady in that he threw it over there looking for the call.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

I just went back to the dvr to watch because the highlights I found on youtube only show the live feed angle and moves on.

 

On the game broadcast, they show a replay that shows the defender making a great play on the ball by getting his arm/hand in there at the exact time Beasley is thinking he is about to make the grab.

 

Romo comments that he thinks the defender got away with a hold, but that could not be seen on the game broadcast views imo. 

 

All I know is that I do not blame Beasley (unless someone wants to say he could've come back to the ball).

 

I don't know enough or am not smart enough to tell if Josh should've thrown it or not. Might just be a defender making a great play and an unlucky bounce into another defenders arms. Or maybe the defender used illegal holding to make the play. Idk.

 

McDermott's comment about that INT in his presser, FWIW, was "maybe we need to extend our hands more and come back to the ball". 

No question to me that Beas tried to body-catch that.

 

Romo had them show a broadcast that IMO showed a bit of a hold that kind of threw him off and may have prevented him coming back.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said:

I'm a little worried about Spencer Brown vs Sam Hubbard. Hubbard is a speed rusher, something Brown has trouble with. 

The pass pro is what it is , and it’s on Josh to get the ball out, move etc etc Pretty much as it’s been the entire season. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
23 hours ago, billvernsays said:

Right. The fair thing to do would’ve been to give KC the bye since they were 14-3. The divisional game this week should’ve been at neutral site and if the Bills win KC comes to us (we overtake the 1 seed assuming we win at the neutral site) and the Bengals goto KC if they beat us since they wouldn’t have been able to get to 14 wins regardless of the outcome of our canceled game. 

I think the best solution would have been to have KC's last game against the Raiders just not count to the formula, that way the 3 teams in question all have played 16 games and have equal amount of games played and can follow normal tie breaking procedures. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Patrick Duffy said:

That's what I thought also when first saw it, but maybe could have been considered one of those "bang-bang" type plays I assume.

 

 

Yeah so far they have been letting them play, 

I’m fine with letting them play. I’m not fine with blatant PI which that was. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

If you're around it on a daily basis, that "they gotta play us" BS starts to get old really quickly. And the way that Zach Taylor just blows off a pretty bad performance as "AFC North football" is something that McDermott didn't do in his post-game speech. The Bills are "humble and hungry." The Bengals are "salty and hungry." For years the answer to "Who Dey" was "pretty much everybody."

 

Humble and Hungry worries me a bit..  I get the mantra, and that's who McDermott and Frazier are... but if we can take anything from the two Cincy drives a few weeks ago, it's that they want to take it to our Defense and physically impose their will.  

 

When I watch some of these playoff defenses that slow down people, they seem to be filled with guys who are borderline line-steppers and chirp nonstop.  I don't any of that from our guys, sans Milano's physicality ... and guess what, he's a first team All-Pro.  Edmunds brought the hit stick out on Sunday, and that was good to see.  

 

Not saying we necessarily need to be like that to win, but Ravens Defenses are always like that.  Chiefs a few years ago in the AFC CG.. they were as physical as they could possibly be all game.   Bengals Offense came out, literally, with the intent to hurt people on that Monday Night.  

 

I'm hoping to see us match, and exceed, the Bengals physicality and aggression.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:

Unless you're Tre White. That PI call that extended the Fins sole long drive was weak, especially given all that they let go throughout the game. 

You can’t call that but not the Beasley play. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, wjag said:

After watching Baltimore v Cincinnati would it make sense to play 3DL and 3 LBs and 5 DBs?  Flood short zone passes with hands and date them to run Mixon?

No. They'll bust the bills d open a couple times with a busted coverage beat deep route to score. That's how they win. They only need 2 or 3 big plays and an average mediocre drive to score 24-30 pts and they win.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

I think the best solution would have been to have KC's last game against the Raiders just not count to the formula, that way the 3 teams in question all have played 16 games and have equal amount of games played and can follow normal tie breaking procedures. 

They weren’t going to spring that on KC for something that really didn’t involve them. This was about the Bills and to a lesser extent CIN and the Ravens. 

Posted
Just now, SCBills said:

 

Humble and Hungry worries me a bit..  I get the mantra, and that's who McDermott and Frazier are... but if we can take anything from the two Cincy drives a few weeks ago, it's that they want to take it to our Defense and physically impose their will.  

 

When I watch some of these playoff defenses that slow down people, they seem to be filled with guys who are borderline line-steppers and chirp nonstop.  I don't any of that from our guys, sans Milano's physicality ... and guess what, he's a first team All-Pro.  Edmunds brought the hit stick out on Sunday, and that was good to see.  

 

Not saying we necessarily need to be like that to win, but Ravens Defenses are always like that.  Chiefs a few years ago in the AFC CG.. they were as physical as they could possibly be all game.   Bengals Offense came out, literally, with the intent to hurt people on that Monday Night.  

 

I'm hoping to see us match, and exceed, the Bengals physicality and aggression.  

Find Tre White and throw at him was their plan. 
 

He gave up 3/3 targets. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SCBills said:

 

Humble and Hungry worries me a bit..  I get the mantra, and that's who McDermott and Frazier are... but if we can take anything from the two Cincy drives a few weeks ago, it's that they want to take it to our Defense and physically impose their will.  

 

When I watch some of these playoff defenses that slow down people, they seem to be filled with guys who are borderline line-steppers and chirp nonstop.  I don't any of that from our guys, sans Milano's physicality ... and guess what, he's a first team All-Pro.  Edmunds brought the hit stick out on Sunday, and that was good to see.  

 

Not saying we necessarily need to be like that to win, but Ravens Defenses are always like that.  Chiefs a few years ago in the AFC CG.. they were as physical as they could possibly be all game.   Bengals Offense came out, literally, with the intent to hurt people on that Monday Night.  

 

I'm hoping to see us match, and exceed, the Bengals physicality and aggression.  

That game was this group of Bengal players' first home primetime game. They came out with their hair on fire because they knew the whole NFL world was watching. The game would have settled in.

Posted
1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Find Tre White and throw at him was their plan. 
 

He gave up 3/3 targets. 


True .. I do think Tre White, a few weeks removed from that game, is a much better player now.  He was lacking confidence going into that game and they exploited it. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...