Jump to content

A nod to Khalil Shakir's focus


Simon

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Charles Romes said:

This was the scouting report on shakir. He dropped easy catches in college. That drop was as bad as a turnover and nearly cost the season. 

Yes, the drop nearly cost the season, but one could also say his nice catch saved the season.  These games always come down to big plays and making just ONE more big play than the opponent and Shakir provided one of those important big plays.  I can't be that hard on him.  I like Shakir.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Big Turk said:

 

Don't need a first rounder for that.

I honestly want us to double dip on OLine. He'll, they can triple dip and I'd love it. We NEED to upgrade both guards and probably RT. I wouldn't be mad with a RD1 WR tho. Gabe can be so infuriating.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

I'd prefer a 1st Round Olineman.

Interesting decision point for draft, OL or WR?  We definitely have a need for both.  

 

I can't help but think of the Bengals on the clock two years ago when they desperately needed OL help.  Every draft expert projected T Penei Sewell as a natural fit.  Instead they went with WR JaMarr Chase to compliment an already nice looking WR duo of Higgins and Boyd.  Two years later they are defending AFC champs, looking strong again heading into divisional round of playoffs and still needing OL help.  I doubt they have second thoughts about their pick.  Now if we could only get a JaMarr Chase type talent to fall way down the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, cwater10 said:

Interesting decision point for draft, OL or WR?  We definitely have a need for both.  

 

I can't help but think of the Bengals on the clock two years ago when they desperately needed OL help.  Every draft expert projected T Penei Sewell as a natural fit.  Instead they went with WR JaMarr Chase to compliment an already nice looking WR duo of Higgins and Boyd.  Two years later they are defending AFC champs, looking strong again heading into divisional round of playoffs and still needing OL help.  I doubt they have second thoughts about their pick.  Now if we could only get a JaMarr Chase type talent to fall way down the board.

This doesn’t appear to be a draft where they will find a first round value at WR late in round 1.  It is still early yet for prospect evaluations, so possible for that to change, but right now I’m not sure this is a strong year for WR, unless you are looking for a slot guy - Zay Flowers and Josh Downs both are interesting and Parker Washington could be pretty good, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, cwater10 said:

Interesting decision point for draft, OL or WR?  We definitely have a need for both.  

 

I can't help but think of the Bengals on the clock two years ago when they desperately needed OL help.  Every draft expert projected T Penei Sewell as a natural fit.  Instead they went with WR JaMarr Chase to compliment an already nice looking WR duo of Higgins and Boyd.  Two years later they are defending AFC champs, looking strong again heading into divisional round of playoffs and still needing OL help.  I doubt they have second thoughts about their pick.  Now if we could only get a JaMarr Chase type talent to fall way down the board.

Primary focus should be OL OL OL. It has held back offense from becoming balanced and forces Josh to carry team. They only look average due to Josh’s ability to escape pressure and make plays on his own. However, as shown yesterday if he doesn’t have great game team can be got. Need balanced running attack to avoid becoming one dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...