Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 1/15/2023 at 8:00 PM, teef said:

how does the bills offense look if the wrs don't drop those catches?  ours were far worse drop than theirs.

Expand  

 

Equal, i’d say. Waddle dropped a much easier long ball than Shakir.

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 1/15/2023 at 8:00 PM, par73 said:

Turnovers and ST's mistakes have accounted for Miami's scores.

Expand  

Exactly the things that if we avoid we win going away

Posted
  On 1/15/2023 at 7:59 PM, Buffalo03 said:

Every pass route has every WR running 20 yards up the field. Dorsey is the problem

Expand  

Bills getting beat on special teams and turning over the ball. Poor tackling in critical situations. It's like they lost focus after getting a 1st quarter lead. 

Posted
  On 1/15/2023 at 7:58 PM, Jerboski said:

No the defense is the biggest issue 

 

the offense has bad drops, easily correctable 

 

the defense is giving up yards to a makeshift OL with a practice squad player and an awful QB 

 

the defense has been atrocious 

Expand  

I disagree 2 INT have lead to 10 points. Add in some great punt returns and the Phins have had short fields to score. (I mean settling for 3 when they got the ball at the 20 was great D by Buffalo)

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 1/15/2023 at 8:00 PM, Playoffs? said:

Nah… maybe Knox’s, but Diggs’ was not a catch. 

Expand  


All year the emphasis has been on calling it a score so it can be reviewed.  Suddenly that changes.  🤔

Posted (edited)
  On 1/15/2023 at 8:00 PM, Einstein said:

 

I think it looks that way because of Miami’s dropped balls.


What does the defense look like if Miami caught their easy passes? Multiple bombs, first downs, etc?

Expand  

 

What does it look like if the Knox doesn't drop an easy TD and Shakir and easy catch for 50+ yards inside 15 instead of the Bills punting?

 

Pretty sure the Bills come out ahead in that one.

Edited by Big Turk
Posted

What's weird about the non-review is that they were saying it's because there wasn't enough there to review...so isn't that the review then?  Why do they even bother reviewing other plays after NYC reviews it.  It's like NYC reviews it and goes "oh this is a good one...hey local refs, review this play".  Just seems that NYC should just do the reviews and not involve the on-field ref.

Posted

Caught not possessed until out of bound is not a catch  and then caught but dropped out bounds not a catch either I'm some cases. To me it should be "did the ball ever fall and hit the ground in bounds period. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...