Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 7 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: and the ethical obligation to do a drug screen? What if he OD'ed the next day and the nurses notes said he was visibly impaired (and of course, they would)? c'mon. I could make big bucks being an expert witness against you but I'm enjoying retirement. LOL! If he OD'd the next day, that's not my responsibility. You're just making stuff up now.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Doc said: LOL! If he OD'd the next day, that's not my responsibility. You're just making stuff up now. Wrong. You saw him impaired and you did nothing. You are culpable. Have you ever been to a malpractice trial or deposition? Litigator's would jump at this case like a dog in heat. Your insurance company would likely settle. Where's our lawyers? Weigh in please. Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 6 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: Wrong. You saw him impaired and you did nothing. You are culpable. Have you ever been to a malpractice trial or deposition? Litigator's would jump at this case like a dog in heat. Your insurance company would likely settle. Where's our lawyers? Weigh in please. I saw he was impaired...and knew based on that that he'd OD the next day? LOL! OK. No lawyer would take that case.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Doc said: I saw he was impaired...and knew based on that that he'd OD the next day? LOL! OK. No lawyer would take that case. You didn't check him for it. He may well have had an already dangerous level of any combination of drugs in him. If you haven't been sued (and you're a real doctor) you soon will be. And I feel very sorry for your patients. Forget the EKG's. Let's discuss toxicology. Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Good conversation. VERY BAD conversation...SMH. He's either a terrible doc or a pretender. If I had a choice, it would be pretender. Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
B-Man Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 Back to the thread. Twitter Files 14: The Fake Tale of Russian Bots https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1613589031773769739.html Twitter Files: Top Democrats peddled false Russian bots narrative about Nunes memo, despite Twitter warnings https://www.foxnews.com/media/twitter-files-top-democrats-peddled-false-russian-bots-narrative-about-nunes-memo-despite-twitter-warnings Twitter Files part 14 sheds light on “Russian bots” https://www.teslarati.com/twitter-files-russian-bots/
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 1 minute ago, redtail hawk said: You didn't check him for it. He may well have had an already dangerous level of any combination of drugs in him. If you haven't been sued (and you're a real doctor) you soon will be. Didn't check him for...a future OD? How does one do that doctor? And no, never been sued (knocks on wood).
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Doc said: Didn't check him for...a future OD? How does one do that doctor? And no, never been sued (knocks on wood). Do a drug screen Dufus! Thank the lord Ive worked with talented, well trained, caring anesthesiologists (even if one did write a rude remark by sharpie on my chest during knee surgery). He's brilliant. UVA I believe. You? Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 Just now, redtail hawk said: Do a drug screen Dufus! And a drug screen today will tell me he's going to OD tomorrow? LOL! That's brilliant. I'm sure you were sued a lot.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Doc said: And a drug screen today will tell me he's going to OD tomorrow? LOL! That's brilliant. I'm sure you were sued A drug screen will tell you he's a likely addict who is compensating for some hole in his soul. 35 years in practice, was sued X2. . Once as a consultant to a surgeon who f'ed up and once covering for a partner on call who f'ed up. Won both. The surgeon case, the family thanked me at the deposition for being there and telling the truth. Like I had any choice. Sorry, I forgot the case in residency where I ran the code on an invasive radiologist that missed a lunf=g lesion and hit the heart of a 40 something. I was dropped there as well. bad stuff happens. Sometimes it's no ones fault. Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 Just now, redtail hawk said: A drug screen will tell you he's a likely addict who is compensating for some hole in his soul. Oh boy.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Doc said: Oh boy. Indeed. Compassion and empathy are necessary but not sufficient to be a good doc, "doc". Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Precious. My precious... Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
JaCrispy Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) This is ridiculous! There’s no way that the Left would make up a story THIS big out of thin air… It’s almost like their total existence is based on mental illness…😉 Edited January 14, 2023 by JaCrispy
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: Indeed. Compassion and empathy are necessary but not sufficient to be a good doc, "doc". I have those but they only go so far. I'll await the first time I'm sued for not seeing a hole in someone's heart. But I'm interested in hearing from the lawyers about how good a case this would be. Bueller, Bueller? Anyone, anyone? 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Doc said: I have those but they only go so far. I'll await the first time I'm sued for not seeing a hole in someone's heart. Good for you. sport! I'm guessing 54k posts keeps you away from keeping up on the literature. Is the basement dank? Edited January 14, 2023 by redtail hawk
Doc Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 5 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: Good for you. sport! I'm guessing 54k posts keeps you away from keeping up on the literature. Is the basement dank? Literature about how one can be sued for not recognizing a (figurative) hole in someone's heart? Got a link "doc"?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 14, 2023 Posted January 14, 2023 Just now, Doc said: Literature about how one can be sued for not recognizing a (figurative) hole in someone's heart? Got a link "doc"? Failure to diagnose- google it chief
Recommended Posts