Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I may be wrong but I’ve always said it stems back to Hillary. She is and was the source. Others just picked it up and ran with it, seeing as how they suffered no ill effects from the narrative. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

More cognitive dissonance...

 

 

Although nobody delusional enough to believe all the bull crap the government dishes would agree, it appears the main theme here is a concern for the government's ability to protect its monopoly on the distribution and communication of propaganda on the platform. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

But they still won't admit it. See OIG report on crossfire hurricane. 17 serious transgressions by the FBI, every single one of which led to more lying to a FISA court. But they'll tell you they were all just innocent mistakes. No big deal. Move along.

 

Talk about a cult.

yes, all of this is comparable to a quid pro quo to Zelensky from Trump or an ask to find 11000 votes in Georgia.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

But they still won't admit it. See OIG report on crossfire hurricane. 17 serious transgressions by the FBI, every single one of which led to more lying to a FISA court. But they'll tell you they were all just innocent mistakes. No big deal. Move along.

 

Talk about a cult.

Thats what I was expecting.

 

but got the canned attempt at deflecting to a lazy strawman. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

right on cue.  So the pro trump posts are true and any anti trump ones are bs?

 

If you've followed the twitter files and what they reveal and if you were honest then you would have written:

 

The pro Trump posts are flagged or labeled Russian disinformation whether they are true or not and the anti Trump posts, at least publicly, receive no such moderation whether true, false or anywhere in between.

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, all of this is comparable to a quid pro quo to Zelensky from Trump or an ask to find 11000 votes in Georgia.

 

Ahhh deflection. We are talking about the OIG report. Have you read it?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Russian disinformation.  Do you really need social media examples?  Never mind, you'll just disparage the source.

 

Obviously the Russians have been engaging in disinformation, as they have for decades.  No one anywhere is disputing that.  The left however has conflated it with Russian collusion.  Which is a...conspiracy theory. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, all of this is comparable to a quid pro quo to Zelensky from Trump or an ask to find 11000 votes in Georgia.

That’s your response? Trump didn’t tell anyone to FABRICATE votes. He asked that they look for ballots/votes to make up the slim margin. There’s a huge difference! 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, all of this is comparable to a quid pro quo to Zelensky from Trump or an ask to find 11000 votes in Georgia.

Un-elected civil servants and appointees at the FBI defining and executing actions against private citizens or selected targets of their choosing, outside the required laws and statutes governing the scope of the organizations charter and mission is dangerous.  And blatantly illegal.  Why anyone would choose to ignore or accept this is mind boggling.  Who knows, anyone could be their next target, maybe even you if they so desire?   

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

That’s your response? Trump didn’t tell anyone to FABRICATE votes. He asked that they look for ballots/votes to make up the slim margin. There’s a huge difference! 

Ledt's see what the grand jury in Ga says.  Guilt in the courts is a high bar that I hope they'll reach.

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Un-elected civil servants and appointees at the FBI defining and executing actions against private citizens or selected targets of their choosing, outside the required laws and statutes governing the scope of the organizations charter and mission is dangerous.  And blatantly illegal.  Why anyone would choose to ignore or accept this is mind boggling.  Who knows, anyone could be their next target, maybe even you if they so desire?   

I don'yt rely on Twitter for information just entertainment

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

That’s your response? Trump didn’t tell anyone to FABRICATE votes. He asked that they look for ballots/votes to make up the slim margin. There’s a huge difference! 

 

It's like how he told the J6 protestors to break into the Capitol without ever saying anything even remotely close.  They're masters of subtext.

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)

Quid pro quo. Might as well put this in Websters. 

 

Here's a billion dollars in loan guarantees...

 

But wait, you first need to fire the prosecutor who is investigating Burisma where Hunter Biden sits on the board.

 

Within six hours the prosecutor is fired. Well son of a B word.....

 

Almost every serious accusation from the left is projection.

 

 

 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

Quid pro quo. Might as well put this in Websters. 

 

Here's a billion dollars in loan guarantees...

 

But wait, you first need to fire the prosecutor who is investigating Burisma where Hunter Biden sits on the board.

 

Within six hours the prosecutor is fired. Well son of a B word.....

 

Almost every serios accusation from the left is projection.

 

 

 

have you read much about this investigator?  From international sources?  Whatabout that?

Posted
13 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

yes, all of this is comparable to a quid pro quo to Zelensky from Trump or an ask to find 11000 votes in Georgia.

And another set of strawmen and logical fallacies to divert the narrative.

 

 

Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

have you read much about this investigator?  From international sources?  Whatabout that?

 

Have you considered how much you'd be hyperventilating if that was Trump and it was his son Don or Eric sitting on the board?

 

Have some principles for heavens sake.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

And another set of strawmen and logical fallacies to divert the narrative.

 

 

I don't think you understand the fallacy.  I'm comparing relevant conditions, not arguing against something unimportant to the discussion.  It speaks to the comparative seriousness of the allegations.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

I love how in a thread where it's clearly demonstrated that social media and legacy media helped lie for years to the American public...that redtail asks us to go back to those very same liars to get the real story.

 

Can't make it up.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

I love how in a thread where it's clearly demonstrated that social media and legacy media helped lie for years to the American public...that redtail asks us to go back to those very same liars to get the real story.

 

Can't make it up.

my logic prof was ugly. I listened carefully with my head in a notebook

Posted
2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

my logic prof was ugly. I listened carefully with my head in a notebook

 

He/she never warned you about cognitive dissonance. That much is clear.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

have you read much about this investigator?  From international sources?  Whatabout that?

 

Burisma was a corrupt company in a corrupt nation.  What possible reason could ever be given for them offering a seat on their board to a guy as worthless as Hunter?

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...