Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, 34-78-83 said:

duplicate discussion happening. See the one with 26k views. These clips are all in there as well (FYI).

 

I know, I posted them in there.  But this thread was about would he be available...I think something teasing an actual link to the Bills is worth discussing on its own and more relevant than burying it in this monstrous thread.  

 

No disrespect to the mods, but sometimes there is part of a story that is worthy discussing on its own that shouldn't be buried in a monstrous thread that many people have already stopped coming to because its 30 pages of the same info being regurgitated over and over again.  So a lot of people miss the new info they may have been interested in.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, BuffBills51 said:

This seems like Zach Ertz all over again. Every reporter had him coming here and a lot of the board did as well. I’d love the move but will believe it when I see it. 

Wait, the trade for Ertz is back on?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

I hate to be the downer on the party
 

bean said, no big splashes this year

 

While I agree with you, he said that last year to then signed Von Miller to a 27 year long contract worth 2.2 Billion :nana:

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

I hate to be the downer on the party
 

bean said, no big splashes this year

In FA... didn't say anything about trades 🤣

Posted
Just now, John from Riverside said:

I hate to be the downer on the party
 

bean said, no big splashes this year


I actually don’t even want Hopkins ….  But Beane saying one thing and doing another is not unheard of … this happened before the Von Miller deal

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

Everyone needs to be patient. This trade will not happen until we are well into 150 pages 

just like OBJ

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

sometimes there is part of a story that is worthy discussing on its own that shouldn't be buried in a monstrous thread that many people have already stopped coming to because its 30 pages of the same info being regurgitated over and over again.

 

With 28000 views and counting, "many people" have not stopped coming here.

And at no point in my tenure as as the local janitor will twitter and IG nonsense ever merit a duplicate thread. 0:)

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Simon said:

 

With 28000 views and counting, "many people" have not stopped coming to it.

And at no point in my tenure as as the local janitor will twitter and IG nonsense ever merit a duplicate thread. 0:)

The proper term is custodian

Posted
7 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

The proper term is custodian

No way I am claiming custody of this joint.

I'm just the janitor, dammit...

 

image.thumb.png.385c8fcca4f230dbffdde928bf9ba4ce.png

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 5
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...