Will DeAndre Hopkins be available this offseason?

[Dr. Who]

1 minute ago, mikemac2001 said:

There twitter just seemed like repost and then they had another deal like this about lamer to 49ers 

Thanks. That is not the most substantial basis to confidently assert anything if that is the kind of outfit they are.

[gordong]

7 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Thank you. I went over to their website. Too busy for me.

I've no idea how credible these folks are. Perhaps others with better knowledge can comment.

me either...   

[mikemac2001]

2 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:

Thanks. That is not the most substantial basis to confidently assert anything if that is the kind of outfit they are.

There all rumors really some people like to poke the fanbases for clicks and RT 

 

[gordong]

I just want the bills to get him and this be over, Please for the love of GOD make it STOP.

[Reed83HOF]

8 minutes ago, TOboy said:

Was doing the same. They have 20k followers, so it’s not a complete nobody. Time will tell I guess. 
 

Still seems unlikely to me that they’d pay for OBJ, then DHop, then Lemar. Then again we have no space either. 

 

Fairly certain it is from this Baltimore Podcaster

 

 

 

 

[Alphadawg7]

9 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

I’m not sure of their credibility. Pac-man’s “source” is DHop and Bills, Chiefs were mentioned. Not Ravens. Guess we’ll see

 

Pac-man literally cited the Ravens, and its where the term "skrong" originated when he used that (implying strong) term regarding the possibility of him becoming a Raven.  

 

So how can you say "Not Ravens." when Pac-man has specifically stated the Ravens are a strong contender for Hopkins? 

[JoeF]

13 minutes ago, Turbo44 said:

Which could be the same wording for any of 31 other teams, though:  "Bills trade for Hopkins may be close as terms, "figure out draft compensation and money"

Very true.  Search and replace with any NFL team name but the Cardinals.  Total click-bait.....

[Mango]

10 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

especially since Lamar hasn’t been extended yet…unless it’s a formality

 

Or....hear me out.....

Their investment in WR are for one of two reasons. 

 

1. Entice Lamar to sign the tag to play with a real WR corp. 

 

2. This is where we all put on our tinfoil hats....They are prepping for life after Lamar, and know they need weapons to support a young QB. Lamar may sign his tender, but Baltimore may not extend, or they could even tag, extend, and trade. Flip those picks into QB, OL, and defense. 

[K D]

Ravens probably overpaying knowing they can't get Lamar back without doing so. They probably see OBJ and Hopkins as short term commitments just to get Lamar on the hook for the next 5 years 

[HereComesTheReignAgain]

26 minutes ago, gordong said:

I saw it here.

 

 

So all they have to do is "figure out draft compensation and money"!  In other words, they have not figured out any part of the trade yet.  

Edited April 26, 2023 by HereComesTheReignAgain

[Warriorspikes51]

8 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Pac-man literally cited the Ravens, and its where the term "skrong" originated when he used that (implying strong) term regarding the possibility of him becoming a Raven.  

 

So how can you say "Not Ravens." when Pac-man has specifically stated the Ravens are a strong contender for Hopkins? 

in the clip from today, he said Bills or Chiefs

[Aussie Joe]

2 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

Ravens probably overpaying knowing they can't get Lamar back without doing so. They probably see OBJ and Hopkins as short term commitments just to get Lamar on the hook for the next 5 years 

Thought you said he was going to Chiefs or Jets?

[thenorthremembers]

Ravens looking to sign $45 million dollars worth of wideouts to attempt and get their QB who doesnt throw to wideouts to sign a long term deal is an interesting tactic.

[drummernut74]

1 minute ago, thenorthremembers said:

Ravens looking to sign $45 million dollars worth of wideouts to attempt and get their QB who doesnt throw to wideouts to sign a long term deal is an interesting tactic.

With 3.9 mil available in cap space LOL!

[aristocrat]

“Hopkins deal close to ravens as teams figure out compensation and money”

 

 

yes that’s how a trade generally works. Hilarious 

[CaptnCoke11]

1 minute ago, drummernut74 said:

With 3.9 mil available in cap space LOL!

about all the space we have too

[Alphadawg7]

12 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

in the clip from today, he said Bills or Chiefs

 

Oh gotcha, sorry I thought you meant in general.  I actually didn't know there was a new clip today, just saw it though

[Solomon Grundy]

3 hours ago, HappyDays said:

This guy may just be a master troll, but for those who follow his words here you go.

Say what y'all want, I'm rolling with him and his reporting and I hope you're all going to his restaurant for crow fricassee when Hopkins is a Buffalo Bill😎

[NewEra]

2 hours ago, sven233 said:

I know it works out pretty well value wise for the Cards (3rd round) for us to drop from 27 to 34 for Nuk, but man......that seems like too much of a dream scenario for us.  To get a top 10 WR without giving up an early round pick would be amazing.  Even if it costs us an additional late rounder this year or next, who cares.  To think you could come out of this draft with Hopkins and still be able to draft Campbell (or whoever your choice is at LB) at a better value in the 2nd round and still have another 2nd round pick for a OL or DT seems insane.  But if it's on the table, I just don't see why we wouldn't do something like that.  The money can be figured out even if they don't help with the contract.

 

With all the smoke around this it's going to be pretty disappointing when it doesn't happen!  HA!

It really would be amazing- especially if AZ took on a good portion of the cap hit

[BillsShredder83]

13 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

in the clip from today, he said Bills or Chiefs

likely one of the two. Baltimore makes no sense, and he has SOME leverage here