Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:

I’d be fine with that trade 


seems fair. At this point I’ll assume Arizona won’t be retaining any $ 

 

if we really wanted someone in the late 1st, we could always jump back up

Edited by Warriorspikes51
Posted

I mean, i'd be fine with that deal. I just don't think Arizona would give us Hopkins for moving up 7 picks and picking up a conditional late rounder in 2024. That's a FAR cry from what everyone is reporting they're asking for.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

I mean, i'd be fine with that deal. I just don't think Arizona would give us Hopkins for moving up 7 picks and picking up a conditional late rounder in 2024. That's a FAR cry from what everyone is reporting they're asking for.


maybe, but as that twitter account pointed out…it’s the optics of a 1st round pick

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


maybe, but as that twitter account pointed out…it’s the optics of a 1st round pick

Another poster discussed earlier, but do we need to be under the cap at the moment we hypothetically acquire Hopkins?  For example, he puts us over the cap at the moment he is acquired (prior to him potentially restructuring his contract).

 

If so, we have some options but mostly limited to restructuring perhaps Tre or Dion.  Which is probably the "break glass" maneuver for Beane

Posted
42 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

We still don't have a MLB or RT

 

I think people have some notion that championship teams are perfect, with true-blue starters & pro bowlers at every position.

 

Even if the season started today - we'd have capable players at those positions. But, of course, we still have the draft ahead of us to fill any perceived holes.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

Another poster discussed earlier, but do we need to be under the cap at the moment we hypothetically acquire Hopkins?  For example, he puts us over the cap at the moment he is acquired (prior to him potentially restructuring his contract).

 

If so, we have some options but mostly limited to restructuring perhaps Tre or Dion.  Which is probably the "break glass" maneuver for Beane

 

I felt like a Tre restructure was the most obvious option going into this offseason. But they haven't done it. Looking into it, it appears we have an out in his contract next offseason if we wanted. My guess is that they don't want to play with future years in his deal in the event that he doesn't return to form or even regresses further and they want to exercise that option.

 

They also restructured his deal already on 12/1/22. So they may have already done all that they figured they could do a few months ago.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/tredavious-white-21768/

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said:

Another poster discussed earlier, but do we need to be under the cap at the moment we hypothetically acquire Hopkins?  For example, he puts us over the cap at the moment he is acquired (prior to him potentially restructuring his contract).

 

If so, we have some options but mostly limited to restructuring perhaps Tre or Dion.  Which is probably the "break glass" maneuver for Beane


I honestly don’t know, would make sense that he would put us over the cap at moment he is acquired…& so we’d have to free up 9-10 in space prior. That could basically be done immediately and may not even be reported until after the fact. Extending DaQuan would also be nice

Posted
Just now, Success said:

 

I think people have some notion that championship teams are perfect, with true-blue starters & pro bowlers at every position.

 

Even if the season started today - we'd have capable players at those positions. But, of course, we still have the draft ahead of us to fill any perceived holes.

 

Very little confidence at MLB right now, especially for a team with SB aspirations.

 

RT, I have hope Spencer Brown improves going into year 3.  Usually the bigger jump for us, year 2 to 3, and he's getting his QST full NFL offseason (without a surgery).  But hope we add at the position in draft.

 

As mentioned earlier, I'm not keen to MLB round 1.  Round 2, sure...but it's a risk when there's maybe 3 guys who could start immediately

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

 


I do this in a heartbeat. Then you go BPA between Jack Campbell, Steve Avila, or consider moving back again if the partner is there

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

I felt like a Tre restructure was the most obvious option going into this offseason. But they haven't done it. Looking into it, it appears we have an out in his contract next offseason if we wanted. My guess is that they don't want to play with future years in his deal in the event that he doesn't return to form or even regresses further and they want to exercise that option.

Agree.  Beane said he's not against more restructures, but gave the hint he doesn't want to do anymore.

 

By my math:

1. Currently: Maybe we are 9-10m under cap.  (Draft likely eats $2m, but this would hypothetically happen after a Hop trade).

 

2. Tre restructure: saves approx $5.7m

 

3. Dion restructure: saves approx $6m.  But Beane might be more reluctant, given Dion has some potential void years in his deal already.

 

4. Hopkins: 2023 cap hit is currently $30m, but we'd be on the hook for approx $19m (assuming Cards do NOT retain anything more than required).

 

So in summary:

1. Immediate Cost=$19m

2. Cap status: let's sat $10m under, so we'd need to clear $9-10m

3. Needed savings: we'd HAVE to restructure both Tre and Dion.  OR Ed is dealt, OR Cards retain more of the cap hit (likely need them to keep at least $5m more...so we only have to restructure Tre).

 

This is why this deal could be VERY VERY complex to get negotiated, due to cap issues.  And would require us to kick alot of cap to future years.

Posted
20 hours ago, FireChans said:

Might as well trade Josh Allen away. He doesn’t guarantee anything either.

 

Yeah thats not even close to the same thing and you know it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...