Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah...he is annoying, but so is Stephen A Smith, Dan Patrick, and almost all of these talking heads.

 

Both you and I know their names though, and we have obviously done some listening, so good for them for making a lot of money doing what we do but with advertising dollars and large forums.

 

My local guy in Colorado was so nauseating. After 6 months of hearing his schtick about the backup left guard, the below average minor league relief pitcher, or the 11th man off the bench in basketball, I knew he was grasping for material and lessened my intake.

 

I can't lie though. I did love hearing him bash on how much Russell Wilson sucks now, was a system QB, and he is completely fake with his NFL persona!

Posted

I actually like Shannon, but on the show he does with Bayless it seems that most of their discussion concerns two topics, the Cowboys and Lebron. Grows old pretty quickly.

Posted
2 hours ago, Logic said:

There are two types of people that report on or talk about sports.

1.) People who actually try to analyze the game, break news, discuss strategy and matchups, impart information, and generally be an actual journalist/analyst/reporter.

2.) People who play characters. These are carnival barkers, clowns, pro wrestling personas. Stephan A Smith, Skip Bayless, Nick Wright, even Kyle Brandt (albeit he's more intelligible and likable and benign than the others).

There are dozens and dozens of the former, and most blend together. They are a dime a dozen.

There are only a few really notable, well-known examples of the latter. They stand out. They get paid the big bucks.

I hate that this is so. I absolutely love analysis and absolutely loathe shouting talking head TV. 

Alas, the carnival barkers are what get the ratings. Sort of symptomatic of our culture at large and the type of entertainment we tend to gravitate toward as a society.

 

That's what people don't get about the Dan Le Batard show...it's a parody of basically skip bayless and way to serious sports talk by people who most likely never even watched the game they are talking about.

Posted

How do ANY of these so-called "experts" have any viewers/listeners at all?! Seriously, do any of those shows enhance anybody's life at all?

 

The really funny part is that tens of millions of sports fans know more than the "experts" that spew out their "hot takes." It's really puzzling to me. Like someone said earlier, "why does anybody care what these morons think or say?"

 

I stopped watching/listening to these shows, AND pre-game shows decades ago. Got way better things to do with my time.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

When has Skip Bayless ever been reputable in a good way? He is a turd. Always has been, 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

This is a guy who has to talk for a couple hours everyday. you aren't gonna sell air time with 2 hours of sound reasoning. People overreact. If it's not your taste, just don't watch. 

 

Aren't most normal people working when he's on the air?

Posted

I don't watch this kind of programming, but it seems obvious to me that he's making a joke about Brown being very old in the clip in the OP.  

 

On the other hand, if it brings you joy to assume that Bayless is an idiot and/or that you should be angry at him, feel free.  That's what Bayless is getting paid for.  He's a big boy, and he can take it.

Posted

it's part of his shtick.....every successful show needs a contrarian/bad guy....otherwise its boring.

 

he's good at being a jerk. 

 

what i can't stand.... about him and others like stephen A is they constantly interrupt their debate partner(s) acting superior. i can't watch that.

Posted
11 hours ago, Bob Jones said:

How do ANY of these so-called "experts" have any viewers/listeners at all?! Seriously, do any of those shows enhance anybody's life at all?

 

The really funny part is that tens of millions of sports fans know more than the "experts" that spew out their "hot takes." It's really puzzling to me. Like someone said earlier, "why does anybody care what these morons think or say?"

 

I stopped watching/listening to these shows, AND pre-game shows decades ago. Got way better things to do with my time.

Bob, like you, I ditched the pre-game show 15 years ago with their slow-motion highlights, and players laughing about the good old days, reliving their playing careers.

 

I do enjoy sports radio and listened to Colin Cowherd consistently since he joined ESPN in 2004. 

 

But I agree the show developed numerous problems. 

1. The same guests, in the same timeslots, every week.

2. No variation in topics - LeBron, Brady, Rodgers, Cowboys, Westbrook. It's the same show every day. 

3. His co-host, man or woman, has too big of a role. Nobody wants to hear Kristine Leahy, Joy Taylor or Jason McIntyre (obnoxious Jets fan) talk. 

 

I stopped listening to his show the day he came in with a new idea - the Broncos trading Russell Wilson for Kyler Murray straight up. 

 

Now I just listen to WGR 550. I don't learn anything listening to them because it's generic fan talk, but at least it's Bills and Sabres talk and not media driven storylines about who is going to be the MVP, or an ESPN Who's The Best ranking show. 

 

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...