Jump to content

We're onto Miami(Miami's headed to Buffalo)...opening line BUF -10! Game at 1:05 PM SUN 1/15


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

Brandin Bryant for sure

 

But there's a numbers game for the game-day actives. 

 

A typical game-day roster would feature

2 QB

8 OL

5 RB (including Taiwan Jones)

2 TE

5 WR

4 Edge

4 DT

6 LB

9 DB (3 safeties, 3 CB, 1 "switch", 1 nickel CB, 1 dime CB)

3 specialists

 

So if, for example, we want to have 6 WR active, we need to take a spot from another position group

 

 

Why do they do 6 LBers when we only put two on the field? I would guess they can drop one of those if they wanted to have 6 receivers.

Posted

Like @SectionC3said in the Beasley thread, the Bills are going to need to call up Beasley, Brown and a DT this week.

They can only elevate 2 from the PS so someone has to get signed to the 53.

 

The Bills only have 4 WR on their active roster so signing another WR to the 53 is no big deal.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Because it's "tipping your hand" offensively as to what game plan intentions may be

 

 

First of all...I don't think we even know yet that McK DNP'd.  He wasn't out there during the media portion of practice, but it's not unprecedented for players the media didn't see to be listed as DNP

 

Do you really think that players on the PS aren't "involved and active 100%" without being officially elevated, especially if they know they're in the game plan?

 

 

 

Flip it around...even if this move is required, why does the GM make it now and not Saturday?  Why tip off the Dolphins that maybe McKenzie's injury is significant and he'll be inactive?  Why not leave them guessing?

 

 


 

Not really tipping your hand - McK pulled a hammy yesterday in practice - basically since then every Buffalo reporter has basically been saying he will not practice and based upon how the Bills treat soft tissue and muscle pulls - he will be out this weekend and depending on how bad it is maybe limited or out next week.

 

The Bills will have to list him on the injury report - so how big of a surprise that your slot guy can’t go would it be for the Bills to call up the PS slot guy that has done it before. 
 

Why hide it at this point.  The Bills are going to start and play the veteran slot guy and use Shakir as his back-up.  
 

We are beyond the larger salary cap situation- so the call up doesn’t impact that.

 

I could understand for a physical issue - Phillips shoulder - that maybe you want to keep that close as he may or may not play, but a pure speed guy like McK with a pulled Hammy - they are not going to risk that when they have a player like Cole ready to go.

 

As to the question of are PS players as invested - it depends on the player - most of them are only seeing time right now as scout duty, but activating a guy like Cole also tells the team - here is what we expect and who will be doing what.

 

I don’t think McD at this point is trying to figure out how to trick the Dolphins - he is ready just line us up and go play - we are the better team and have been in both meetings.

 

 

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

Because it's "tipping your hand" offensively as to what game plan intentions may be

 

 

First of all...I don't think we even know yet that McK DNP'd.  He wasn't out there during the media portion of practice, but it's not unprecedented for players the media didn't see to be listed as DNP

 

Do you really think that players on the PS aren't "involved and active 100%" without being officially elevated, especially if they know they're in the game plan?

 

 

 

Flip it around...even if this move is required, why does the GM make it now and not Saturday?  Why tip off the Dolphins that maybe McKenzie's injury is significant and he'll be inactive?  Why not leave them guessing?

 

 

And now it is official - DNP for McK - just as reported in the section the reporters watch.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

 

I've had this feeling that Bridgewater will be the QB since McDaniel's weird comment about Teddy's recovery/availability for Sunday.  

This comment about significant handshake work is the first actual datapoint or anecdote that lends credence to this that I've seen..

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

Not really tipping your hand - McK pulled a hammy yesterday in practice - basically since then every Buffalo reporter has basically been saying he will not practice and based upon how the Bills treat soft tissue and muscle pulls - he will be out this weekend and depending on how bad it is maybe limited or out next week.

 

The Bills will have to list him on the injury report - so how big of a surprise that your slot guy can’t go would it be for the Bills to call up the PS slot guy that has done it before. 
 

Why hide it at this point.  The Bills are going to start and play the veteran slot guy and use Shakir as his back-up.  
 

And now it is official - DNP for McK - just as reported in the section the reporters watch.

 

 

 

Just a little note that the section the reporters watched featured Tim Settle being attended by trainers and helped off - yet he isn’t listed as limited.  So I don’t think one should rely 100% on what the reporters see as gospel.  They’re good at reporting what they see, but players do spend more time getting treatments then come out and join practice.  The Bills have also reported hammies and groin injuries that have not caused players to lose time as well as hammies that have kept players out 3 weeks.  So I’d say we don’t know which this is, at this point.

 

As far as early Bease elevation “tipping a hand”, I feel that I’ve spelled out why I think that and with all respect, you’re doing the “lalalal not listening” thing, so I’m out.  I”ll just point out once again that there is a large vocabulary of plays that Beasley used to run, that got taken out of the Bills playbook early in this season.

 

There are also a number of plays McKenzie runs that Beasley really can’t at this point - but Shakir could theoretically manage most of those and Hines many of the rest

 

4 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

I've had this feeling that Bridgewater will be the QB since McDaniel's weird comment about Teddy's recovery/availability for Sunday.  

This comment about significant handshake work is the first actual datapoint or anecdote that lends credence to this that I've seen..

 

What does “handshake work” mean?  I’ve never heard that term

 

Says he was not seen throwing

 

 

 

Are they talking literally, handshakes, like Josh Allen’s handshakes with his crew?

Edited by Beck Water
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

I've had this feeling that Bridgewater will be the QB since McDaniel's weird comment about Teddy's recovery/availability for Sunday.  

This comment about significant handshake work is the first actual datapoint or anecdote that lends credence to this that I've seen..

You sure? kind of sounds the opposite to me and he even stated in a follow up tweet.  Sounds like he literally meant working on handshakes.

 

 

 

Edited by The Wiz
Posted
1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

RPO in the original sense "run pass option" need not involve the QB, correct?  It technically just involves a running back and a passing threat

You’ve lost me here. An RPO play literally involves the QB every time because he is the one that determines which option to choose. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, K-9 said:

You’ve lost me here. An RPO play literally involves the QB every time because he is the one that determines which option to choose. 

What still confuses me is how they call Josh's RPO's "RPOs".  A lot of the time it's a fake hand off to the RB and then Josh runs it.  More of an RRO than an RPO even though they do actual RPOs the same way.  Is that really an RPO or does it have a different name that they just don't say?

Posted
36 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

Why do they do 6 LBers when we only put two on the field? I would guess they can drop one of those if they wanted to have 6 receivers.

 

Good question, and I’m really not sure at this point

Dodson and Matakevich are core ST’ers

I think right now Klein would be the guy who comes in if we play a base D, but it might be Dodson

 

Anyone got the code here?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Just a little note that the section the reporters watched featured Tim Settle being attended by trainers and helped off - yet he isn’t listed as limited.  So I don’t think one should rely 100% on what the reporters see as gospel.  They’re good at reporting what they see, but players do spend more time getting treatments then come out and join practice.  The Bills have also reported hammies and groin injuries that have not caused players to lose time as well as hammies that have kept players out 3 weeks.  So I’d say we don’t know which this is, at this point.

 

As far as early Bease elevation “tipping a hand”, I feel that I’ve spelled out why I think that and with all respect, you’re doing the “lalalal not listening” thing, so I’m out.  I”ll just point out once again that there is a large vocabulary of plays that Beasley used to run, that got taken out of the Bills playbook early in this season.

 

There are also a number of plays McKenzie runs that Beasley really can’t at this point - but Shakir could theoretically manage most of those and Hines many of the rest

 

 

What does “handshake work” mean?  I’ve never heard that term

 

Says he was not seen throwing

 

 

 

Are they talking literally, handshakes, like Josh Allen’s handshakes with his crew?

 

Yeah, I took it to mean literal handshakes. And laugh away (I am slightly at myself lol) but I still think if you are trying to get back onto the field and you have a pinky that is hurt in any way, you are not doing intricate handshakes with teammates. 

 

and the "not seen throwing during media viewing portion of drills" doesn't really mean anything to me. I know it's reported a lot about injured QB's, but I see that as a way coaches/teams could try to be setting up smokescreens. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, K-9 said:

You’ve lost me here. An RPO play literally involves the QB every time because he is the one that determines which option to choose. 

 

Fine “does not involve the QB as an option to carry the ball”, does that help?  

 

The point is the OP to which I was responding indicated an RPO could not be run effectively if the QB is not a proficient runner.  But they can.

 

https://footballadvantage.com/rpo-football/

 

They just gain another dimension when the QB can also run,

Posted
4 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

Brandin Bryant for sure

 

But there's a numbers game for the game-day actives. 

 

A typical game-day roster would feature

2 QB

8 OL

5 RB (including Taiwan Jones)

2 TE

5 WR

4 Edge

4 DT

6 LB

9 DB (3 safeties, 3 CB, 1 "switch", 1 nickel CB, 1 dime CB)

3 specialists

 

So if, for example, we want to have 6 WR active, we need to take a spot from another position group

 

 By my count that is only 48. What am I missing?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Nineforty said:

 

Yeah, I took it to mean literal handshakes. And laugh away (I am slightly at myself lol) but I still think if you are trying to get back onto the field and you have a pinky that is hurt in any way, you are not doing intricate handshakes with teammates. 

 

and the "not seen throwing during media viewing portion of drills" doesn't really mean anything to me. I know it's reported a lot about injured QB's, but I see that as a way coaches/teams could try to be setting up smokescreens. 

 

I can’t imagine throwing a football with a broken pinky, but evidently Aaron Rodgers managed with a broken thumb?

 

The things these guys do to get out there

 

Agree with you that “no throwing during media portion of practice” could be a smokescreen

 

2 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

 By my count that is only 48. What am I missing?

 

That the game day active roster is 46 players, 48 provided at least 8 OLmen are active?

Edited by Beck Water
Posted
10 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Just a little note that the section the reporters watched featured Tim Settle being attended by trainers and helped off - yet he isn’t listed as limited.  So I don’t think one should rely 100% on what the reporters see as gospel.  They’re good at reporting what they see, but players do spend more time getting treatments then come out and join practice.  The Bills have also reported hammies and groin injuries that have not caused players to lose time as well as hammies that have kept players out 3 weeks.  So I’d say we don’t know which this is, at this point.

 

As far as early Bease elevation “tipping a hand”, I feel that I’ve spelled out why I think that and with all respect, you’re doing the “lalalal not listening” thing, so I’m out.  I”ll just point out once again that there is a large vocabulary of plays that Beasley used to run, that got taken out of the Bills playbook early in this season.

 

There are also a number of plays McKenzie runs that Beasley really can’t at this point - but Shakir could theoretically manage most of those and Hines many of the rest

 

 

What does “handshake work” mean?  I’ve never heard that term

 

Says he was not seen throwing

 

 

 

Are they talking literally, handshakes, like Josh Allen’s handshakes with his crew?


 

So basically you don’t want the Bills to “tip their hand”, but by activating Beasley and forcing the Dolphins go back and gameplan for Beasley is a bad thing?

 

It is not lalalala crap - it is I genuinely do not understand what difference it makes if the Bills know the extent of the Hammy injury and expect that he is not going to play - why not get Cole activated.  The Dolphins would have been planning for him - just as the Bills are planning for Skylar, but still watching for Bridgewater news.

 

The Biggest loss in all this to me is McK typically plays Hill in the scout team and now you have lost that.

 

We will see, but I expect (as you said in an earlier post) - you will have Cole doing his part, Shakir doing the man routes more, and Hines doing the heavy motion/sweeps.  
 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Beck Water said:

 

I can’t imagine throwing a football with a broken pinky, but evidently Aaron Rodgers managed with a broken thumb?

 

The things these guys do to get out there

 

 

That the game day active roster is 46 players, 48 provided at least 8 OLmen are active?

Copy. Thank you. 👍

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...