Mango Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: This has been my talking point. If they play they play. If they don’t they don’t. I’m glad Buffalo is in the drivers seat for any decisions by the league. 1 2 Quote
NewEra Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 So Taron is in concussion protocol I assume? Wasn’t sure if you can practice limited in protocol. Quote
K D Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 Do the Bills bring up Cole Beasley for his 3rd and final call up? Or do they save him in case they have to play Cinci week 19? Quote
sonyab1974 Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 11 minutes ago, WickedGame said: I hate that phrase “trap game,” but this suddenly feels like a trap game. Either the Cheatriots take advantage of an emotionally drained Bills team and get the W, or the Bills go Beast Mode for Hamlin and hang 50 on them. Let’s hope for the latter, but my gut says we come out fairly flat. Go beast mode for Hamlin!! 2 Quote
ytownblofan Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 11 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Do the Bills bring up Cole Beasley for his 3rd and final call up? Or do they save him in case they have to play Cinci week 19? Cole's third call up was this past Monday night - assuming it still counts as a call up? 1 Quote
Steptide Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 12 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Do the Bills bring up Cole Beasley for his 3rd and final call up? Or do they save him in case they have to play Cinci week 19? I believe this past week was his final call up. Not sure if the nfl will allow it for this week seeing the circumstances have changed. Quote
ytownblofan Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 26 minutes ago, MasterStrategist said: I'm trying to remember if we saw a combination of Poyer/Johnson earlier this year? I know we had Johnson and Damar... My guess is that Cam Lewis is ahead of Marlowe. Cam brings some athleticism, albeit some questionable decision making I think it will be Marlowe. From what I have read, Cam has been active over Marlowe because he plays Special Teams and can play corner in a pinch, whereas Marlowe does not offer the same flexibility. I think this staff will go with the veteran in Marlowe, knowing he will likely make the safer decisions. But definitely expect both Marlowe and Cam to be active 1 Quote
K D Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, ytownblofan said: Cole's third call up was this past Monday night - assuming it still counts as a call up? 3 minutes ago, Steptide said: I believe this past week was his final call up. Not sure if the nfl will allow it for this week seeing the circumstances have changed. As of now that game doesn't count Quote
Johnnycage46 Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 43 minutes ago, Process said: Taron being limited is a good sign, though it was just a walk through Thanks Hendrickson for the addition of Ankle to Josh's Right Elbow. 1 Quote
Big Turk Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 16 minutes ago, ytownblofan said: Cole's third call up was this past Monday night - assuming it still counts as a call up? I think the NFL has to provide clarity on their plan moving forward. If it is being ruled a no contest then it wouldn't count. Quote
Brand J Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 6 minutes ago, Draconator said: Really don’t understand this. Can’t be that Rhodes has been outperformed by every DB on the roster. Quote
Draconator Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 Just now, JayBaller10 said: Really don’t understand this. Can’t be that Rhodes has been outperformed by every DB on the roster. The only thing I can think of is depth. It also tells me that Benford is ready to play. 2 Quote
The Wiz Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 Well this would likely be the worst case scenario in terms of scheduling. 1 1 Quote
stevewin Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, BearNorth said: Just looked at the available Free Agent safeties, and Jason McCourty is the only name I even remotely recognize. Cupboard is pretty bare. I would be all for signing McCourty and not even playing him if it means getting him off GMFB Edited January 4, 2023 by stevewin 1 1 5 Quote
Brand J Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 5 minutes ago, Draconator said: The only thing I can think of is depth. It also tells me that Benford is ready to play. Even though Rhodes has never played safety, I’d have to believe he’d be better at that position than an undrafted journeyman on his 3rd or 4th team but hey, I’m just a guy sitting on a couch 😅 2 Quote
Success Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, The Wiz said: Well this would likely be the worst case scenario in terms of scheduling. So, if we didn't get the win against Cincy - we'd have no week off at any point, even if we made the SB. If I'm reading that right. Quote
TheyCallMeAndy Posted January 4, 2023 Posted January 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, Success said: So, if we didn't get the win against Cincy - we'd have no week off at any point, even if we made the SB. If I'm reading that right. There is a one week break before the SB, no? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.