Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 People scream "Nazi" whenever someone hints there might be differences between the races AND advocates preserving the racial purity of said races via legislation (I'm sure to be followed by summer camps for the "inferior" subspecies). 345975[/snapback] They ESPECIALLY scream "Nazi" when someone's stated views: The world has a choice. On the one hand, there is a future in which the world's races have been mixed together to the point that all individual races would be extinct. This future would mean the death of global racial diversity, and indeed the death of the world's races. On the other hand, we can choose a future in which racial uniqueness is preserved; where no race has gone extinct. As for me, I choose life over death, beauty and justice and truth over decadence and globalization and sameness. This is why I utterly and wholly reject global marital genocide. Compare SO nicely with the teachings of Nazi Party philosopher Alfred Rosenberg: I do not imply contempt for other races but, on the contrary, racial respect. Since races, as the core of nations, are created by nature, the very respect for nature itself demands respect for such creations. The purpose of the large-scale development of peoples is the juridical recognition of racially conditioned families of people in their own homelands. Style, customs, language, are the manifestation of different souls and peoples; and just as these cannot be mixed without a resultant deterioration of their purity, so men, as their embodiment, and to whom they belong organically and spiritually, cannot intermingle. But he's not a Nazi, no. He just thinks like one.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 As for your accusations against me, you've fallen on your face every time you were stupid enough to try to defend them; but that hasn't stopped you from shamelessly repeating them, now has it? You haven't even bothered to defend your own honesty when I called it into question. If you want agreement and harmony, I guess you and I can agree honesty ranks pretty low on your current list of priorities. 345995[/snapback] Actually, I've defended both repeatedly...and did so again not five minutes ago. But the only responses I get from you amount for the most part to "I'm rubber, you're glue..." and "I know you are but what am I?" Frankly, I'd expect more from a self-proclaimed MENSA member...but frankly, your repetition of the unconscionably stupid theory that I've been brainwashed by the enemies of racial purity is about the level of discourse I'd expect from an avowed National Socialist.
UConn James Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 (edited) And back to the original point of this thread, the administration today promised $50M in aid to the Palestinians. And they're looking to give them $150M via Congress. A PLO flack says it's a "modest beginning" of aid. Well, isn't that nice? Haven't heard much about Abbas since he took office, but that probably falls in the 'no news is good news' category. You just have to hope this money doesn't filter down to people blowing themselves up, but it probably will. Edited May 27, 2005 by UConn James
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 And back to the original point of this thread, the administration promised $50M in aid to the Palestineans. Haven't heard much about Abbas since he took office, but that probably falls in the 'no news is good news' category. 346028[/snapback] I haven't followed closely (been busy being brainwashed by the enemies of racial purity). I know there's been some violence in Israel and the occupied territories, but has it pretty much toned way down since Abbas took office?
GG Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 I know there's been some violence in Israel and the occupied territories, but has it pretty much toned way down since Abbas took office? 346031[/snapback] Doubt it. They just had to redeploy the extra news trucks to cover the Jackson trial and the runaway bride.
erynthered Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 And back to the original point of this thread, the administration today promised $50M in aid to the Palestinians. Haven't heard much about Abbas since he took office, but that probably falls in the 'no news is good news' category. 346028[/snapback] Um, He's here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,157713,00.html
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 Well...okay, I didn't include Lysenkoism. But that's because his theories, based as they are in parthenogenesis, are discredited. So I assume you're a big believer in them. Actually, I've written a couple of papers on Goedel's (the correct spelling, btw, not "Godel") Incompleteness Theorem as it relates to...well, to things that are way beyond your intellectual abilities. Like math. And words. Goedel was a genius. You...well, not so much... 346013[/snapback] I hate to get into an argument about the correct spelling of Godel's name, but below are a few links to sites which spell it Godel. http://www.nas.edu/history/members/godel.html http://www.exploratorium.edu/complexity/Co...icon/godel.html http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist...file/godel.html http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...051692?v=glance http://libweb.princeton.edu/libraries/fire...bsc/aids/godel/ http://www.english-dictionary.us/meaning/Kurt_Godel.asp http://www.supernaturalminds.com/KurtGodel.html http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article?tocId=9365748 I guess both Time magazine and the Encyclopedia Britannica got it wrong, and you got it right. Google found just 8310 documents with "Kurt Goedel" but 39,300 documents with "Kurt Godel." As someone who thinks as highly of himself as you seem to ought to be aware, most or all academics who studied race in Nazi Germany came to support the Nazis' conclusions. Most people, including myself, agree this had more to do with the pressures and incentives these scientists faced than with any inherent correctness in the theories themselves. If this discussion has shown anything, it is that there is at least as much hatred towards those who dissent from racial orthodoxy today was there was in Nazi Germany. This intolerance and hate can affect people directly--witness the way the authors of The Bell Curve were treated--or indirectly. Funding requests are either granted or denied, professorships are granted or withheld, works are published or left alone. When a very shaky and dubious study was performed to "demonstrate" the races were all the same, the mass media lapped it up; treated the study's authors as heroes, and its conclusions as established fact. Expecting the academic world to be more immune to these pressures now than it was in Nazi Germany is hopelessly naive.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 Actually, I've defended both repeatedly...and did so again not five minutes ago. But the only responses I get from you amount for the most part to "I'm rubber, you're glue..." and "I know you are but what am I?" Frankly, I'd expect more from a self-proclaimed MENSA member...but frankly, your repetition of the unconscionably stupid theory that I've been brainwashed by the enemies of racial purity is about the level of discourse I'd expect from an avowed National Socialist. 346024[/snapback] You do know what the word "avowed" means, don't you? Show me anywhere, anywhere, where I've stated that I'm a National Socialist. Or else do the right thing and take it back. . . . waiting for it, waiting for it . . . Hold on here. Waiting for you to do the right thing is like waiting for water to run uphill. Nevermind.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 They ESPECIALLY scream "Nazi" when someone's stated views:Compare SO nicely with the teachings of Nazi Party philosopher Alfred Rosenberg: But he's not a Nazi, no. He just thinks like one. 346016[/snapback] I can't believe the number of times I keep having to deal with this. Does some selective blindness or mental breakdown inflict you each time your eyes look at my response? For the umpteenth time, you are calling me a Nazi because, in your opinion, something I wrote about race resembled something a Nazi wrote about race. But since Rosenberg began his quote by calling for respect of different races, your logic could be used to "prove" that anyone who called for racial respect was a Nazi. Of course, I expect you to ignore this refutation--just as you have in the past--and go on repeating your name-calling. Typical.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 I hate to get into an argument about the correct spelling of Godel's name, but below are a few links to sites which spell it Godel. http://www.nas.edu/history/members/godel.html http://www.exploratorium.edu/complexity/Co...icon/godel.html http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist...file/godel.html http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...051692?v=glance http://libweb.princeton.edu/libraries/fire...bsc/aids/godel/ http://www.english-dictionary.us/meaning/Kurt_Godel.asp http://www.supernaturalminds.com/KurtGodel.html http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article?tocId=9365748 I guess both Time magazine and the Encyclopedia Britannica got it wrong, and you got it right. Google found just 8310 documents with "Kurt Goedel" but 39,300 documents with "Kurt Godel." 346041[/snapback] They are wrong. It's Goedel. As a member of MENSA, I would have thought you'd know that the umlaut over a vowel translates into English as that vowel followed by an 'e'. But hey, we can yet AGAIN chalk that up as yet ANOTHER thing you're completely ignorant about.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 They are wrong. It's Goedel. As a member of MENSA, I would have thought you'd know that the umlaut over a vowel translates into English as that vowel followed by an 'e'. But hey, we can yet AGAIN chalk that up as yet ANOTHER thing you're completely ignorant about. 346057[/snapback] In that case, I suggest you contact the Encyclopedia Britannica, Time magazine, and the tens of thousands of others who've spelled it "Godel" and let them know how "completely ignorant" they all are. Maybe if you joust with that particular windmill it will keep you out of my hair for a little while.
Kelly the Dog Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 I hate to get into an argument about the correct spelling of Godel's name, but below are a few links to sites which spell it Godel. http://www.nas.edu/history/members/godel.html http://www.exploratorium.edu/complexity/Co...icon/godel.html http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist...file/godel.html http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...051692?v=glance http://libweb.princeton.edu/libraries/fire...bsc/aids/godel/ http://www.english-dictionary.us/meaning/Kurt_Godel.asp http://www.supernaturalminds.com/KurtGodel.html http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article?tocId=9365748 I guess both Time magazine and the Encyclopedia Britannica got it wrong, and you got it right. Google found just 8310 documents with "Kurt Goedel" but 39,300 documents with "Kurt Godel." Actually, MensaMan... the two examples you used, Time and Britannica, both used Godel with the "o" having the umlaut over it, which, in place of that umlaut, an "e" is correctly inserted following the o so the word would be pronounced most correctly. So, if you want to be brilliant about it, it would be much more correct to use the "Goedel" spelling, as our fine fecal hurling friend used, over the "Godel" spelling, sans the umlaut.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 You do know what the word "avowed" means, don't you? Show me anywhere, anywhere, where I've stated that I'm a National Socialist. Or else do the right thing and take it back. . . . waiting for it, waiting for it . . . Hold on here. Waiting for you to do the right thing is like waiting for water to run uphill. Nevermind. 346044[/snapback] This is getting boring. I point out - repeatedly - where your beliefs are straight out of Nazi racial theory, right down to the "respect for racial difference by insuring the purity of the species through segregation". Your only response: "You're a liar." If I'm such a liar, then why are your friggin' beliefs STILL straight out of Nazi racial theory? They are demonstrably so. Why should I apologizing for pointing out a self-evident fact: that YOU are a NAZI. If it walks like a goose, honks like a goose, and goose-steps... Of course, you're also a total idiot...something I've pointed out repeatedly as well, and gotten no response other than "You're a liar." It seems to be the only response you have when the self-evident is pointed out to you: "It's not true, it's all lies, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..."
John Adams Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 In that case, I suggest you contact the Encyclopedia Britannica, Time magazine, and the tens of thousands of others who've spelled it "Godel" and let them know how "completely ignorant" they all are. Maybe if you joust with that particular windmill it will keep you out of my hair for a little while. 346058[/snapback] Ever hear of an umlaut? Silly Kurty. Part of me thought you would have more familiarity with German. The other part of me had so much confidence in you because you're a proud MENSA member. Let me help you out with your pedestal. It seems to have fallen.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 This is getting boring. I point out - repeatedly - where your beliefs are straight out of Nazi racial theory, right down to the "respect for racial difference by insuring the purity of the species through segregation". Your only response: "You're a liar." That's not the way it went. I pointed out the error in your logic--repeatedly, and apparently you repeatedly suffered from some kind of amnesia or something. If I'm such a liar, then why are your friggin' beliefs STILL straight out of Nazi racial theory? They are demonstrably so. Why should I apologizing for pointing out a self-evident fact: that YOU are a NAZI. If it walks like a goose, honks like a goose, and goose-steps... Your warped thought process didn't just result in calling me a Nazi, but in an "avowed" Nazi. In case you don't know the meaning of your own words, an "avowed" Nazi is someone who has professed him- or herself a Nazi. My response was to tell you to either show me where I'd professed myself a Nazi, or else take it back. I correctly predicted you'd choose to do neither, because waiting for you to do the right thing is like waiting for water to run uphill. Of course, you're also a total idiot...something I've pointed out repeatedly as well, and gotten no response other than "You're a liar." Actually, my response was to point out you looked very foolish for calling a Mensa member an idiot. It seems to be the only response you have when the self-evident is pointed out to you: "It's not true, it's all lies, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..."346062[/snapback] You've shown no particular need to tell the truth, so why not point that out? As for things being "self-evident," I guess they would appear that way to a victim of brainwashing such as yourself.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 Ever hear of an umlaut? 346072[/snapback] There's a difference between hearing about it and taking the time to figure out how to put one on the web. You know, there's a theory that the people who hate gays the most have some latent homosexual tendencies themselves. Maybe the people who have expressed the most hatred towards me on this thread--and are presently trying to give me a lesson in German--have some inner issues they need to deal with.
Kelly the Dog Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 You know, there's a theory that the people who hate gays the most have some latent homosexual tendencies themselves. 346085[/snapback] Perhaps it's time to look inward.
Pac_Man Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 Perhaps it's time to look inward. 346090[/snapback] If you want to look inward, go ahead.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted May 27, 2005 Posted May 27, 2005 There's a difference between hearing about it and taking the time to figure out how to put one on the web. You know, there's a theory that the people who hate gays the most have some latent homosexual tendencies themselves. Maybe the people who have expressed the most hatred towards me on this thread--and are presently trying to give me a lesson in German--have some inner issues they need to deal with. 346085[/snapback] So first you spelled it right...then you quoted numerous sources to prove you spelled it right...and now that three people have called you out on it, you say "well, I spelled it wrong, even though everyone else who spelled it that way spelled it right, and you three who caught me spelling it wrong are homosexuals." What the !@#$? First thing in the morning, when you wake up, do you hit yourself in the head with a hammer or something? Did someone cause you major head trauma when the activist courts' program of marital genocide forced them to shoot you steal your Adidas? It's the only possible ways I can imagine anyone being so totally and irrevocably clueless as you are.
Recommended Posts