Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Obviously I'd like to see the Bills get the #1 seed. And the path to the Super Bowl is harder if they don't get it. 

 

But if they lose tonight they are far from done. #1 seeds have won only seven of the last 22 Super Bowls. Getting the home field and the bye are absolutely no guarantee. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Andy1 said:

Reporting on NFL network says Poyer is playing. 


It’s funny that people were ever in doubt about it. 

  • Agree 3
Posted
21 minutes ago, GolfandBills said:

6499D0F7-1B57-47CD-9B1F-E825A8418269.thumb.jpeg.56c5ac1589f5b9319181f0a7abd5ab1c.jpegIncase people are trying to downplay the magnitude of this game 

What is an explanation for the discrepancy between the 4 seed and the 3 seed? Just small sample size? 

Posted

I don't know why, but I feel good.

 

There has been so much Bengals hype, and they've talked so much trash while the Bills remained quiet and focused.

 

Bengals rely on running an airshow and beating teams on the blitz. The Bills defense is about forcing precision drives and getting there with 4 rushers. Bengals starting RT is out.

 

Bengals D is bottom 1/3 of the league at stopping scrambling QBs. That's where Josh eats.

 

I'm not saying it's a done deal, but I legitimately like the way we line up against the Bengals. I think all the hardship the Bills had is making them gel at the right time. I don't think it's easy but as long as 17 is under center I won't count the Bills out of anything. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, arcane said:

What is an explanation for the discrepancy between the 4 seed and the 3 seed? Just small sample size? 

Bc the 4 plays the 1 if they make it out the first game vs 5

Posted
48 minutes ago, flyingant said:

Late money coming in on Buffalo. The line jumped to Bills -2.5

 

41 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

 

 

Think she knows something???


these are related 

Posted
3 minutes ago, arcane said:

What is an explanation for the discrepancy between the 4 seed and the 3 seed? Just small sample size? 

 

Is the 4 seed the first wildcard who is often better than the worst division winner?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

 

2 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Is the 4 seed the first wildcard who is often better than the worst division winner?

Yes. they're the only “WC” team who gets a Home game.

Edited by Chandler#81
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Simon said:

 

Is the 4 seed the first wildcard who is often better than the worst division winner?

That was the case until 2002. That’s when they realigned into 4 divisions per conference and the 4 seed is the worst division winner. 

Edited by FrenchConnection
Posted
7 minutes ago, arcane said:

What is an explanation for the discrepancy between the 4 seed and the 3 seed? Just small sample size? 

 back until… 2002 I think(?), there were only 3 divisions in each conference.   So the 4 seed was the best non-division winner.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

Just reported; John Murphy feeling ‘under the weather’, will not broadcast the game. Sal Capaccio takes the main mic.

 

Omen? 

What are you thinking good or bad? 

 

I want to make a conclusion on this news but not sure what it means lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...