Jump to content

17/18 Game schedule would be better if the NFL ditched home & away within the divisions.


Recommended Posts

Posted

With the extended schedule, the NFL should consider having each team play one game against every other team in their conference plus three against the other conference. 
 

With the elimination of pre-season, start the season with each teams 3 interconference games (least important for tiebreakers) and finish the season playing the three teams in thier division when the games are the most critical.  This system makes its so that every team in a conference has a very similar strength of schedule.  Its just too silly to have the dispartiy in SOS that exists now. 

  • Disagree 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted

It'd be interesting for a bit, but after a while it'd grow stale to see the same thing every year. 

 

Also, wouldn't it only be 2 interconference games instead of 3? 15 games vs AFC teams, 2 vs NFC? Either way, division rivalries would slowly disappear, regardless of when the games are being played. 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Chaos said:

With the extended schedule, the NFL should consider having each team play one game against every other team in their conference plus three against the other conference. 
 

With the elimination of pre-season, start the season with each teams 3 interconference games (least important for tiebreakers) and finish the season playing the three teams in thier division when the games are the most critical.  This system makes its so that every team in a conference has a very similar strength of schedule.  Its just too silly to have the dispartiy in SOS that exists now. 

 

Spunds like you do not like @Chaos.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Chaos said:

With the extended schedule, the NFL should consider having each team play one game against every other team in their conference plus three against the other conference. 
 

With the elimination of pre-season, start the season with each teams 3 interconference games (least important for tiebreakers) and finish the season playing the three teams in thier division when the games are the most critical.  This system makes its so that every team in a conference has a very similar strength of schedule.  Its just too silly to have the dispartiy in SOS that exists now. 

 

But what if KC played the Rams, Chicago, and Atlanta this year in the NFC, and Buffalo got Philly, Dallas, and SF? Three easy wins vs. three difficult games, which could affect the first tie breaker: overall record. At least when a team plays one non-conference division in the entirety, there is a better chance they will be facing a good team, as each division has one (well, except this year with the NFC South, lol).

 

Also, under your proposal, we should just eliminate the divisions then.

Edited by chongli
Posted

Keep divisions and 6 games against division opponents. Too much history and rivalry. Too much fun now that we own the AFCE after the drought. 

 

Once we get to a 21-22 game season in like 2050, assuming no expansion franchises which is no safe bet, then we could do: all AFC teams, each division opponent 2x, and still get 3-4 NFC games per year. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

It doesn't matter, some teams will still have easier schedules since not every team plays the other team. There is no way to have this happen as they will never expand to 31 games.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

There is logic to what you guys are proposing, but "if it ain't broke..." no reason for the NFL to make a move like this. 

 

you can't make the system fair. the best team does not always win the super bowl. and yet we have the most popular game in America. 

 

and with all that said, given enough time, the  cream will rise. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Hard no from me. I like how it's done in general. 2 division games, rotation of others, easier schedule for worse teams. Very interesting and totally ok. Much better than same 15 conference games each year. 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

I don't like that Buffalo played in Las Vegas during the pandemic and I won't get to experience that stadium until 2018 2028, when it's no longer new.

 

 

Edited by unbillievable
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

I don't like that Buffalo played in Las Vegas during the pandemic and I won't get to experience that stadium until 2018, when it's no longer new.

 

 

I hate to tell you, but 2018 already happened.  Seriously, if the Bills win the AFC next season they'll be in Las Vegas for the Super Bowl.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

It doesn't matter, some teams will still have easier schedules since not every team plays the other team. There is no way to have this happen as they will never expand to 31 games.

the difference in two or three interconference games is 95% less differential, than the chiefs getting to play four games against teams that are not even trying to compete. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, unbillievable said:

I don't like that Buffalo played in Las Vegas during the pandemic and I won't get to experience that stadium until 2018 2028, when it's no longer new.

 

 

 

Actually it's 2026 and they could be playing in Vegas again in 2027 if both they and the Raiders finish in same position in standings

Posted
13 hours ago, Chaos said:

With the extended schedule, the NFL should consider having each team play one game against every other team in their conference plus three against the other conference. 
 

With the elimination of pre-season, start the season with each teams 3 interconference games (least important for tiebreakers) and finish the season playing the three teams in thier division when the games are the most critical.  This system makes its so that every team in a conference has a very similar strength of schedule.  Its just too silly to have the dispartiy in SOS that exists now. 


from a parity standpoint- it’s an interesting idea. Ditch division rivalry but also ditch marginal teams coasting through weak divisions 

Posted
3 hours ago, clayboy54 said:

That way, we could play KC in Kansas City every single year for the rest of our lives.

 

Should be LVR since a number of posters say there is no advantage to playing at home in November and December.

Could Bills make deal with NFL to play week 18 in LV every year?

  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...