Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 19, 2023 Posted January 19, 2023 feeling kinda queasy about Homeland Security and the Environment: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3816612-marjorie-taylor-greene-paul-gosar-get-committee-assignments-back/
The Frankish Reich Posted January 19, 2023 Posted January 19, 2023 (edited) The guy is pretty stupid too. When they started talking about him appearing in drag in Rio, we all knew someone would have the photos. Except Georgie that is. He’s really got to improve his game. In this situation any competent PR person would have told him to go with “I am proud to be a gay American, and I proudly participated in the world’s greatest costume gala in Rio. I would never present myself in that manner to young children or in a school setting. And Ron DeSantis says that’s perfectly fine with him.” You just can’t make this $**! up. Edited January 19, 2023 by The Frankish Reich
BillStime Posted January 19, 2023 Posted January 19, 2023 3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: The guy is pretty stupid too. When they started talking about him appearing in drag in Rio, we all knew someone would have the photos. Except Georgie that is. He’s really got to improve his game. In this situation any competent PR person would have told him to go with “I am proud to be a gay American, and I proudly participated in the world’s greatest costume gala in Rio. I would never present myself in that manner to young children or in a school setting. And Ron DeSantis says that’s perfectly fine with him.” Nah - this isn’t on GS or whatever his name is.. this is on Robert Zimmerman, and the Democratic idiots and media on Long Island.
B-Man Posted January 19, 2023 Posted January 19, 2023 Third reminder: Santos is a fool, but being a lying fool is not a prerequisite for removal. . . . . . . . . . No matter how much the media/Left keep pushing it. Quote There are already means to remove someone from office. If his constituents want, they should start this process. Instead what do we get ? A leftist media instructing us that this nonsense is the biggest story of the day, and we should all debate it over and over online. No thanks. 1 2
BillStime Posted January 19, 2023 Posted January 19, 2023 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Third reminder: Santos is a fool, but being a lying fool is not a prerequisite for removal. . . . . . . . . . No matter how much the media/Left keep pushing it. Yeah F ethics
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 25 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: The guy is pretty stupid too. When they started talking about him appearing in drag in Rio, we all knew someone would have the photos. Except Georgie that is. He’s really got to improve his game. In this situation any competent PR person would have told him to go with “I am proud to be a gay American, and I proudly participated in the world’s greatest costume gala in Rio. I would never present myself in that manner to young children or in a school setting. And Ron DeSantis says that’s perfectly fine with him.” You just can’t make this $**! up. the idiots that voted for him are worse.
SoCal Deek Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 The Left loves this story for obvious reasons but I have to wonder where was the Democratic candidate DURING this race? 2
Doc Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 51 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: the idiots that voted for him are worse. Not as bad as those that voted for Fetterman.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) 58 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: The Left loves this story for obvious reasons but I have to wonder where was the Democratic candidate DURING this race? https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/12/house-republicans-george-santos-democrats-ethics guessing this firm doesn't get much new work: The Democrat did spend a total of $22,000 over three payments on Deep Dive Political Research, an opposition research firm, per FEC filings. (This organization did not respond to a Vanity Fair interview request.) Edited January 20, 2023 by redtail hawk 1
Tiberius Posted January 20, 2023 Author Posted January 20, 2023 13 hours ago, B-Man said: Third reminder: Santos is a fool, but being a lying fool is not a prerequisite for removal. . . . . . . . . . No matter how much the media/Left keep pushing it. You are defending this guy, huh? You are cool with this guy being a normal part of the GOP. Awesome, such integrity 1
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are defending this guy, huh? You are cool with this guy being a normal part of the GOP. Awesome, such integrity You have stated you are ok with antisemites like Ilhan Omar so long as they apologize. When this dumbass creep eventually apologizes will you be ok with him? 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) 19 hours ago, redtail hawk said: feeling kinda queasy about Homeland Security and the Environment: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3816612-marjorie-taylor-greene-paul-gosar-get-committee-assignments-back/ For every Santos, there is a cori bush. for every MTG, there is a squad member. Edited January 20, 2023 by Chris farley
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 15 minutes ago, Tiberius said: You are defending this guy, huh? You are cool with this guy being a normal part of the GOP. Awesome, such integrity I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it.
Doc Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it. Look at how they defend Joke's lies. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Chris farley said: For every Santos, there is a cori bush. for every MTG, there is a squad member. except exactly zero of those people held up congress reconvening over a cartoonish set of demands and juvenile, brainstem thinking. 4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it. about the only thing I'm 100% certain of is that everyone will die yet you're 100% certain of a hypothetical! wow. btw, from his pot\sts, I disagree. I know I wouldn't be defending Santos with a D after his name. Edited January 20, 2023 by redtail hawk 1
Tommy Callahan Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 5 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it. Thats a FACT. . it proves it all day every day. 3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: except exactly zero of those people held up congress reconvening over a cartoonish set of demands and juvenile, brainstem thinking. about the only thing I'm 100% certain of is that everyone will die yet you're 100% certain of a hypothetical! wow New goal post? are you calling the house doing their actual job, holding up congress?
All_Pro_Bills Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 (edited) 9 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: except exactly zero of those people held up congress reconvening over a cartoonish set of demands and juvenile, brainstem thinking. about the only thing I'm 100% certain of is that everyone will die yet you're 100% certain of a hypothetical! wow. btw, from his pot\sts, I disagree. I know I wouldn't be defending Santos with a D after his name. It's more a theory than a hypothesis. Take a poster that never, ever criticizes or objects to any democratic position or action and conclude (all other variables equal) they won't criticize a bad actor of the other party if the only variable you change is he belonged to the party of people they won't criticize. Its an assumption that has a high probability of being true based on available historical data. So yeah, let's say I'm 99.9% true as no system or process has a 0 error rate. But my point is still valid. Edited January 20, 2023 by All_Pro_Bills 1
Doc Posted January 20, 2023 Posted January 20, 2023 11 minutes ago, redtail hawk said: except exactly zero of those people held up congress reconvening over a cartoonish set of demands and juvenile, brainstem thinking. Yes, demanding people show up to work, be allowed 72 hours to read a bill before voting on it and allowing 1 Rep to challenge the SotH (like it was before Nan changed it) is "juvenile, brainstem thinking." 1
Tiberius Posted January 20, 2023 Author Posted January 20, 2023 20 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm 100% certain that if Santos was a democrat you'd be defending the guy so pointing fingers at others is disingenuous. You know it, we all know it. Bull, I'm better than that. I wanted Al Franken gone for what he did. 1
Recommended Posts