Jump to content

Should we go after Josh Jacobs?


BuffaloBills1998

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, BuffaloBills1998 said:

He looks/sounds fed up with the raiders. Some might call it a stretch but after watching this I think he can’t wait to get out. Also I don’t think we’re resigning Singletary 

 

We just had 2RBs run for about 100 yards each and you’re looking at free agent RBs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:


productivity is measured over a season.  In  4 years Jacobs has has one season under 1000.  Singletary, even with 2 17  game seasons is unlucky to get his first  over 1000

 

 

Productivity is measured over a season ... per rush.

 

Jacobs is a very good and productive back. So is Singletary. Not as good as Jacobs, but very good.

1 hour ago, QLBillsFan said:

Why ? He will sign for a reasonable deal. Underrated big time contributor on this team. 

 

 

Yeah.

 

This is a good year to be trying to sign an RB to a reasonable contract. Supply is high and demand is pretty much as usual. A lot of good-looking young backs coming out in the draft this year, and a lot of solid guys are available as FAs.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Big C said:

More likely we re-sign Singletary to a team-friendly deal than we pursue Jacobs after the season he has had. Not to mention Cook looks better and better as the season progresses. 

what about a player friendly deal, why is it always team friendly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep the law firm of  Singletary & Cook together.  Motor not going to cost that much with free agent RB class. Plus I want to upgrade the oline and get more speed & athletic, better route running WR's. We can draft another RB in the later rounds. We have guys of our own to resign (Edmonds, Oliver & Poyer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Herb Nightly said:

Beane isn't likely to sign a RB that already has 4 years of wear & tear.

With Allen's contract set to balloon,and the free agency of Poyer and Edmunds; Beane wont spend much on a back.

Singletary fits this offense but if he signs elsewhere, Bills could survive with Cook and a couple inexpensive rookies 

Beane signed Frank Gore a few years ago so I'm not sure how you justify your first sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the 4 key 2023 FA's

Edmunds - Cap Hit, 12.7 MM - Mkt Value 14.3 [but someone will overpay]

Poyer - Cap Hit 10.8M - Mkt Value 11.0 [Is Rachel done with Buffalo winters]

Motor - Cap Hit 2.8M - Mkt Value 5.9

Saffold [haha] Cap Hit - 4.2M - Mkt Value 5.4 [$2.0 MM dead cap in 2023]

 

Also coming up

Davis [2024 fa] - Cap Hit 1.1M - Mkt Value 13.5 [again someone will overpay]

Oliver [2024 fa] - Cap Hit 10.7 [5th Yr] - Mkt Value 12.5

 

Some food for thought here.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, QLBillsFan said:

Why ? He will sign for a reasonable deal. Underrated big time contributor on this team. 


I would guess that I’ve been one of Síngletary’s biggest fans on this board since he was drafted. I think he’s been fantastic.  I agree that he’s underrated. 
 

That said, money needs to be spent on the o line. 
 

Make the o line better, keep Cook as RB1 and get a lower-priced free agent vet to mentor/spell Cook. 
 

That’s just what I would do. Not saying anyone is right or wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


While casting dispersions on Devin seems to be a hobby around here, he’s a consistent producer of around 1000 yards from scrimmage per season at about 5 TDs per touch. He rarely is TFLd and usually makes the first guy miss. 

 

reread my posts.  not disparaging him.  He's what we have.  Jacobs is a better RB.  That's all.

11 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I actually love the player I just don’t think it’s a good allocation of resources

 

I agree.  Was disagreeing with another poster that he's not a top RB.  He clearly in in today's NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BobbyC81 said:

 

We just had 2RBs run for about 100 yards each and you’re looking at free agent RBs?

 

That's 1 game against a sorry Bears team.  Jacobs does this.  He has games of 229, 144, 143, 154 and 144 this season alone.  

 

For the record, Josh Jacobs has 1539 yards on the season at 5.0 yards per clip.  He has a career average of 4.5ypc with Derek Carr as his QB, so the Singletary faithful can't pull that ypc bs.

 

This guy is it.  A 3 down back that propels this franchise to where we need to be.  

 

The goal here is to win Super Bowls.

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

YES.   An Aj Dillon type back.

 I think the plan will be to have J Cook increase at the work load to around 10-15 touches a game.  Buying an expensive RB1 for full time duty would limit the opportunity for your second round pick to flourish - bad use of resources.  So no Barkley/Hunt/Pollard.

 

AJ Dillon would be a great fit for the role of Thunder - a veteran who could get the short yardage and would know about pass protection.

 

It's about cost though.  When the market dries up after the above RBs then Dillon or Singletary might be able to be had at a reasonable rate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SydneyBillsFan said:

I would be comfortable re-signing Motor to a 3-year / 15 million extension. I think he and Cook would be serviceable. Hines may also come back. No need to spend additional money on the RB room.

That 5-6 mil/yr is the sweet spot to resign him. Any more and you're better off spending that money elsewhere and any less you've got yourself a nice deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...