Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

What ever happened to that Prince guy?

The saints scooped him up- I think he’s on their PS.

 

i prefer Bryant to Emili personally 

Posted
56 minutes ago, eball said:

We all knew (or should have known) Morse would be out at least this week.  Van Roten played ok once he settled in last Saturday night, so it may be that they keep him at C and let Bates return to his RG spot so they are only replacing one and not two positions on the line.

 

 

Only issue I have with Van Roten, which is a massive issue, is he has issue getting the ball to Josh when he’s under center. Other than that, I think he will be fine as a blocker

Posted
54 minutes ago, Herb Nightly said:

Don't you think Bates would return to his usual,starting RG position, with Van Roten at C? Some continuity at least.

 

You're not asking me, but in previous games when he's available, Bills have preferred to move Bates to C and bring Van Roten in at G

 

It works better

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, wjag said:

Heard today that KC has the 3rd best OL as rated by PFF.  Buffalo is 28th...  ooof..

 

I think PFF ratings are to be taken with a box of Morton's (when it rains, it pours)

 

Consider:

Bills currently have the #4 offense on points (trailing Dallas by 9 points now), #2 for yards, #3 for Y/Play

Top-10 for pass Y/A, AY/A, NY/A

#8 for rush yards, #3 for rush Y/A

 

Does it pass the "logic test" that the Bills could achieve all that as an offense, even with Josh Allen being the Alien Creature we all know him to be, if our OL were actually 28th in the league?

 

I'll go with Greg Cosell, who uses the old-fashioned eyeball: our OL is average or a bit better than average, no more.  Josh Allen makes up for a lot of flaws.  But he doesn't allow for the Bills to have a top-10, even top-5 offense with a bottom-of-the-league line.

 

That, My Martian Friend, would be an "Earth Shattering Ka-Boom"

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Disagree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NewEra said:

Yup, maybe some Ed too.  We should bring up Brandin Bryant again (if it’s allowed).  

 

I believe it's allowed.  He's played in 4 games this season, but I believe he was actually signed to the 53 man roster for 3 of them.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, eball said:

We all knew (or should have known) Morse would be out at least this week.  Van Roten played ok once he settled in last Saturday night, so it may be that they keep him at C and let Bates return to his RG spot so they are only replacing one and not two positions on the line.

 

 

Have you seen Rotten snap the ball on shotgun. Josh better bring his shortstop glove.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

We can get by without Morse this week: the Bears D-line has 8.5 sacks TOTAL thus far this season. That's ridiculously low and could be a record.

 

But I'm not optimistic that after six documented concussions that he's coming back any time soon; and I would not be shocked if this was the end for him.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, eball said:

We all knew (or should have known) Morse would be out at least this week.  Van Roten played ok once he settled in last Saturday night, so it may be that they keep him at C and let Bates return to his RG spot so they are only replacing one and not two positions on the line.

 

 

I excpect to see it the other way around. Last time Morse missed a game (think Detroit) they started that way and ended with Bates at C and GVR at RG. 

 

The big question is how healthy is Ike. Cos Bates at C and Ike at RG is our strongest combo with Mitch down IMO.

10 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

I think PFF ratings are to be taken with a box of Morton's (when it rains, it pours)

 

Consider:

Bills currently have the #4 offense on points (trailing Dallas by 9 points now), #2 for yards, #3 for Y/Play

Top-10 for pass Y/A, AY/A, NY/A

#8 for rush yards, #3 for rush Y/A

 

Does it pass the "logic test" that the Bills could achieve all that as an offense, even with Josh Allen being the Alien Creature we all know him to be, if our OL were actually 28th in the league?

 

I'll go with Greg Cosell, who uses the old-fashioned eyeball: our OL is average or a bit better than average, no more.  Josh Allen makes up for a lot of flaws.  But he doesn't allow for the Bills to have a top-10, even top-5 offense with a bottom-of-the-league line.

 

That, My Martian Friend, would be an "Earth Shattering Ka-Boom"

 

My eye test says it is closer to 28th than it is to above average. 28th feels a bit low.... but it is in the 20s not the teens IMO. It is the worst oline among Superbowl contenders except possibly the Bengals whose line is playing better rn (they have been lucky with injuries and the continuity has helped) but they still have a sub-par player at left tackle. The Bills actually have a perfectly good player at left tackle. It is the rest that makes you worry. 

Posted
12 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

If Bates can go at center, we will be fine I actually like him a lot as a center.

That’s one of the reasons we matched the Bears’ offer sheet.  With the expectation of having a backup on those positions on the line.  Not to be a mere speed bump.  But to actually play the positions on the line where we needed depth so the next man up wasn’t just somebody off the PS.  Time for Beane to remind him to earn that money.  🤞

Posted
14 hours ago, Airseven said:

This is going to hurt in a tough weather game. Morse has been the stalwart. It seems there’s much “overlooking” going on this week…

You're Filthy Beast's identical twin, aren't you?

Posted (edited)

image.png.2b8b5f158548d09265861191bc21b5d4.png

 

Morse Code

 

.. / -... .- -. --. . -.. / -- -.-- / .... . .- -.. --..-- / -... .- -.. / .... . .- -.. .- -.-. .... .

 

.

Edited by HOUSE
Posted
2 minutes ago, HOUSE said:

image.png.2b8b5f158548d09265861191bc21b5d4.png

 

Morse Code

 

.. / -... .- -. --. . -.. / -- -.-- / .... . .- -.. --..-- / -... .- -.. / .... . .- -.. .- -.-. .... .

If I'm reading this right, it says you found your wallet, but there's no money in it.😱🤣🤣🤣

Posted
9 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

If I'm reading this right, it says you found your wallet, but there's no money in it.😱🤣🤣🤣

Nope

  • Haha (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...