Tommy Callahan Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 3 hours ago, BillStime said: And the cult doesn’t even blink when Trump colludes with the DOJ, DOD, FBI, Russia, NRA, Murdoch, Fox and so on… Welcome to politics cupcake LMAO. a lefty saying Collusion. that ship sailed. but nice blue anon story 1 1
BillStime Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 17 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LMAO. a lefty saying Collusion. that ship sailed. but nice blue anon story OH, so cute... big bad blue anon blah blah blah. Trump did collude with Russia and as much as you deny it - he certainly coordinated way too much with the Russians and handed out pardons to his friends. 1
BillsFanNC Posted December 20, 2022 Author Posted December 20, 2022 27 minutes ago, Chris farley said: LMAO. a lefty saying Collusion. that ship sailed. but nice blue anon story So wait Trump colluded with a completely weaponized FBI & DOJ to do what exactly? Take himself down? Please stop quoting the collossal moron that is Billstime. Please. 2 1
BillsFanNC Posted December 20, 2022 Author Posted December 20, 2022 And here you have it explained succinctly, in less than 2.5 minutes using multiple examples, just how easy it was to authenticate the laptop emails from Hunter Biden. tHeY wErE hAckEd!!!! 1
All_Pro_Bills Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 38 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: And here you have it explained succinctly, in less than 2.5 minutes using multiple examples, just how easy it was to authenticate the laptop emails from Hunter Biden. tHeY wErE hAckEd!!!! So basically the FBI and CIA were conducting an unauthorized intelligence operation, as part of a systemic misinformation campaign, against the American people. Specifically here to protect Biden. As it happened while Trump was in office, the alternative is to believe the administration of a sitting President would authorize a misinformation campaign intended to damage his candidacy and help his opponent suppress misdeeds and indiscretions. So who gave the order to the FBI and CIA directors to take these actions? Or did they take action without higher approval? And If it wasn't the President or any other authority inside the executive branch with the authority to issue this directive then it had to be somewhere else inside the government, a member of Congress perhaps, or somebody outside the government that has no authority under the system. In other words, sedition. 2
BillStime Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: completely weaponized FBI & DOJ Just say the election was corrupt" and "leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen." -DJT Hilarious, just like DR - this simp can't STAND anyone getting in the way of the cult's narrative. Trump’s ever-present — and still growing — exploitation of the Justice Department
Doc Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said: So basically the FBI and CIA were conducting an unauthorized intelligence operation, as part of a systemic misinformation campaign, against the American people. Specifically here to protect Biden. As it happened while Trump was in office, the alternative is to believe the administration of a sitting President would authorize a misinformation campaign intended to damage his candidacy and help his opponent suppress misdeeds and indiscretions. So who gave the order to the FBI and CIA directors to take these actions? Or did they take action without higher approval? And If it wasn't the President or any other authority inside the executive branch with the authority to issue this directive then it had to be somewhere else inside the government, a member of Congress perhaps, or somebody outside the government that has no authority under the system. In other words, sedition. We'll find out during the hearing/investigation.
BillStime Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said: So who gave the order to the FBI and CIA directors to take these actions?
JaCrispy Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 20 hours ago, BillStime said: Say what???? Billsy, all you have to do is ask yourself if you would want Trump’s DOJ doing the same thing to Dems on Twitter…Because, according to your logic, you would be just fine with it…😉
BillStime Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 11 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Billsy, all you have to do is ask yourself if you would want Trump’s DOJ doing the same thing to Dems on Twitter…Because, according to your logic, you would be just fine with it…😉 Oh ok
JaCrispy Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh ok Accidentally? That’s no accident- that’s what we want… We want corruption exposed wherever it leads… But it doesn’t seem like something you want… 1
BillStime Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 11 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Accidentally? That’s no accident- that’s what we want… We want corruption exposed wherever it leads… But it doesn’t seem like something you want… Omfg 1
JaCrispy Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 13 minutes ago, BillStime said: Omfg Does this mean you oppose both the Trump and Biden administrations for suppressing speech of their political opponents?
BillStime Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 17 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Does this mean you oppose both the Trump and Biden administrations for suppressing speech of their political opponents? Oh are you changing the topic? 50 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: We want corruption exposed wherever it leads… So selective - lolz Funny - none of you wanted Trump investigated one bit… what changed your tune?
JaCrispy Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 (edited) 36 minutes ago, BillStime said: Oh are you changing the topic? So selective - lolz Funny - none of you wanted Trump investigated one bit… what changed your tune? Ha! Exposed again… I knew you could never bring yourself to answer such a simple question, which is why I asked it… Any normal person, who seeks truth, would easily say they want both sides exposed if they engaged in speech suppression… Only a disingenuous partisan, such as yourself, whose only truth is power, and could not betray his most basic cravings, would not be able to answer… Carry on…I’ve gotten all I needed from you tonight…😉 Edited December 21, 2022 by JaCrispy 1 1
BillStime Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Ha! Exposed again… I knew you could never bring yourself to answer such a simple question, which is why I asked it… Any normal person, who seeks truth, would easily say they want both sides exposed if they engaged in speech suppression… Only a disingenuous partisan, such as yourself, whose only truth is power, and could not betray his most basic cravings, would not be able to answer… Carry on…I’ve gotten all I needed from you tonight…😉 No - where did I ever say I didn’t want the truth exposed? I have been nothing but consistent. I have nothing to lose - I have made it clear multiple times - if anyone broke the law - including the Biden’s - indict them. Who gives a !@#$? Now - where have you and the cult ever said the same about Trump? Meanwhile - you and the cult have turned yourselves inside out defending the most corrupt POTUS in our lifetime. Now - keep sucking on Twitter’s files and keep pretending Trumps collusion with Russia,DOJ, DOD, FBI, Russia, NRA, Murdoch, Fox and hush money so on doesn’t exist. Gtfoh
ChiGoose Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 7 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: To absolutely nobody’s surprise, this is not true. No, The FBI Is NOT ‘Paying Twitter To Censor’ “This had nothing to do with any “influence campaign.” The law already says that if the FBI is legally requesting information for an investigation under a number of different legal authorities, the companies receiving those requests can be reimbursed for fulfilling them... (a)Payment.— Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), a governmental entity obtaining the contents of communications, records, or other information under section 2702, 2703, or 2704 of this title shall pay to the person or entity assembling or providing such information a fee for reimbursement for such costs as are reasonably necessary and which have been directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, or otherwise providing such information. Such reimbursable costs shall include any costs due to necessary disruption of normal operations of any electronic communication service or remote computing service in which such information may be stored. But note what this is limited to. These are investigatory requests for information, or so called 2703(d) requests, which require a court order.“ Also, Twitter rejects about 60% of legal requests to take content down.
BillsFanNC Posted December 21, 2022 Author Posted December 21, 2022 6 hours ago, ChiGoose said: To absolutely nobody’s surprise, this is not true. No, The FBI Is NOT ‘Paying Twitter To Censor’ “This had nothing to do with any “influence campaign.” The law already says that if the FBI is legally requesting information for an investigation under a number of different legal authorities, the companies receiving those requests can be reimbursed for fulfilling them... (a)Payment.— Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), a governmental entity obtaining the contents of communications, records, or other information under section 2702, 2703, or 2704 of this title shall pay to the person or entity assembling or providing such information a fee for reimbursement for such costs as are reasonably necessary and which have been directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, or otherwise providing such information. Such reimbursable costs shall include any costs due to necessary disruption of normal operations of any electronic communication service or remote computing service in which such information may be stored. But note what this is limited to. These are investigatory requests for information, or so called 2703(d) requests, which require a court order.“ Also, Twitter rejects about 60% of legal requests to take content down. Lol. Right dude. To absolutely nobody's surprise, @ChiGoose hand waves his way around excusing the FBI being involved in things they have absolutely no business being involved in. Because his team good. Let's try this one. What's your take on the DOJ spying on Devin Nunes' team?
Recommended Posts