Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Gene1973 said:

They need a blowout win. Sick of these close games where the offense and defense take turns looking like crap.

Let me say this....I too would love to see us turn in a complete game, ie offense, defense and special teams.  However I don't think we necessarily NEED one at this point in the season.  #1 AFC East, #1 AFC and controlling our destiny for that 1st round bye.

 

3 hours ago, biLLyBuFFs said:

If Peterman starts, we're doooooooomed!! 😂

 

 

Dude, I just got a closer look at your avatar ....is your pumpkin throwin up retatta???

 

🤣🤣🤣

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, smuvtalker said:

 

Dude, I just got a closer look at your avatar ....is your pumpkin throwin up retatta???

 

🤣🤣🤣

Lol, yeah .. pumpkin guts all over the puketriots

Posted
47 minutes ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Bears coming off a shorter week is something to note as well. With back to back Saturday games, this is essentially a normal week for the Bills just accelerated by one day. The Bears have to cut out something, wether it a day off, install, practice, film, etc. 

 

Advantage, Buffalo.

I assume that Monday becomes Chicago's day off rather than the usual Monday routine, which I believe consists of meetings and film work.  They'll do practice on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday like Buffalo.  Buffalo probably had meetings and film work today.  

Posted
4 hours ago, hemma said:

That’s a windchill of -15 F.

 

Past unpleasant into painful.

 

You might be able to get a ticket on the cheap!    😋

Posted
15 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

You might be able to get a ticket on the cheap!    😋

They need to start building Drive-In stadiums, like the movies in the old good days.

Posted
2 hours ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

 

I think they’ll use a 3 man rush with a delayed rush/spy like we saw vs KC. Sit back and play coverage, and let the horses up front go to work. 

then we have to pound the GD rock

2 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said:

The Bills better get their "fundamentals" together this week against the Bears. Gonna see a heavy dose of Montgomery and Herbert. 

lol. im so sick of fundamentals with McD. its like blind faith. and i know hes very religious. sorry get better players in here 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, chaccof said:

This strikes me as a classic game that the Bills can blow through over confidence and looking ahead to Cincinnati the following week.   Sure hope not.   

Even if we were to lose this game that would not be the reason 

Posted (edited)

Wonder if the Bills will use a different defensive scheme for this game to deal with Chicago's run game (and lack of passing game).  Will be tough tackling in this weather and I think we can expect a steady diet of running plays from a run oriented run offense, particularly after Miami's success with the rush against us and the expected windy conditions.

Edited by jahnyc
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

image.png.205983dda931abcfbee3dd377610b201.png

 

I was just about to post a similar meme of his too, lol! I love this!

 

Here are some other good ones:

 

I burst out laughing when I saw this first one:

 

199sna.jpg

 

xfd8r.jpg

 

dont-spell-part-backwards-its-a-trap-do-

 

660758d72274dbcc61d86c3573d159b9.jpg

 

775179bfd3225899c18fdf5b752584bb.jpg

 

 

Edited by chongli
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
7 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

This will be the coldest game the Bills have played in years. Wind 25-30.  Wind chill -14. The team that runs the ball the best wins.  Forget about Josh slinging it around. 

 

Kelly slung it around pretty good in -20 wind chill against the Raiders in the playoffs.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Warcodered said:

Doubt it, winning this one secures the division, they want that bad.

 

Agree as the saying goes the Bears are playing us on “Hats and Tshirts Day”

 

34 minutes ago, jahnyc said:

Wonder if the Bills will use a different defensive scheme for this game to deal with Chicago's run game (and lack of passing game).  Will be tough tackling in this weather and I think we can expect a steady diet of running plays from a run oriented run offense, particularly after Miami's success with the rush against us and the expected windy conditions.

 

Miami succeeded with the run against us because we were very concerned to contain Waddle and Hill and the MIa passing game in general.

 

Who does Chicago have in the pass game that we will have equal concern about?

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, VaMilBill said:

I imagine we will give him the Lamar Jackson/ Zach Wilson treatment. Make him beat us with his arm and contain him in the pocket. Only thing with that is if he is nailing his throws it could be tough on us because it’s tough to get pressure with that Lamar defense. 

 

Will depend somewhat on how our DTs injuries are progressing

Posted

After the Chicago game there was no talk at all about a Fields injury.  To the contrary, Fields himself is talking about going for the single season record for running by a QB, currently held by Lamar Jackson.  He needs to average 70 yards per game over their last three games to make it.  Possessing a very solid running back in David Montgomery, Chicago is a dangerous team on offense, and Buffalo needs to crank up their discipline several notches on defense. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, EmotionallyUnstable said:

Bears coming off a shorter week is something to note as well. With back to back Saturday games, this is essentially a normal week for the Bills just accelerated by one day. The Bears have to cut out something, wether it a day off, install, practice, film, etc. 

 

Advantage, Buffalo.


There’s no advantage. Teams do this all the time.

Posted
8 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:

Looks like it’s going to be very cold and windy. Only 8 degrees for a high without windchill. 30 mph winds. Don’t love it, but have to go in and get the job done. 

Containing Fields running the ball has to be the Bills top priority. The guys legs are special. No small task. Montgomery is a much better version of Motsert. I thought the Bears game would be a relatively easy wins a few weeks ago. Not anymore. 

  • Agree 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

Containing Fields running the ball has to be the Bills top priority. The guys legs are special. No small task. Montgomery is a much better version of Motsert. I thought the Bears game would be a relatively easy wins a few weeks ago. Not anymore. 


Agreed. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the Bears lead the league in rushing. 

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...