Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

[I am sure this has been mentioned elsewhere (the post game thread is way too long for me to read through), but it might be a topic that deserves its own thread. A lot of people are talking about it, but mods feel free to merge this.]

 

I saw the game but did not listen to the NFL Network call. Apparently, Mark Sanchez was critical of Motor's decision to kneel at the four yard line. I will admit I was miffed when I saw the play. My thinking was it is a tie game in very icy conditions. In such conditions, you take the given TD rather than relying on a last-second FG where anything can go wrong (just look at what happened to Justin Tucker yesterday). Yes, I know that would leave Miami 34 seconds and a time out left for the potential tying (or winning) TD, but it is going to be a very hard thing to do. Yes, the Bills did have KC do it to them twice: 13 seconds and a similar thing against them this season at the end of the first half, and Buffalo did it to Minnesota to end the second half this year too, but I still consider it a fluke thing.

 

Still, I can understand the reasoning the other way. Miami has Tyreek and Jaylen, and a defender could just as well slip against them and give up the tying (or winning) TD. And a close FG, even in these situations, is still a relative gimme.

 

It's a tough call, and I will have to side with McD's judgment. He said in the article he has coached his team for this situation, calling it "no mas". Devin, to this credit, knew what to do!

 

In the comments to the article below, almost all of the people were against Buffalo not coring the TD in a tie game in icy conditions, saying the field goal was not a given (although the comments voting was about even). The twitter comments were a little more positive. They said if you have the lead, then sure, but take the points in a tie game in such conditions. They also said if Bass-o-matic missed the FG and the Dolphins went on to win in OT, people would be angry at Motor for costing us the game and first place in the AFC.

 

 

Edited by chongli
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

It worked but I thought it was the wrong play. That decision was all about Tyreek Hill taking up real estate in McD's head. This was not Mahomes in Arrowhead in favorable conditions. It's Tua in Buffalo on snow. If you can't stop that from scoring a TD with less than a minute and no timeouts then we'll you're not a championship team. 

 

Of course it's JMHO, glad it worked out.

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Eyeroll 3
  • Disagree 15
  • Agree 17
  • Thank you (+1) 2
  • Dislike 3
Posted

I don't get it.  Yes it worked in our favor this time however,  with the field conditions deteriorating.   The field goal was NOT a given.   What would we be feeling like today if Bass slipped,  missed or the FG was blocked.  IMO,  I would have liked to see Singletary score and defend the 34 seconds in those weather conditions. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Disagree 6
  • Agree 15
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 2
Posted (edited)

Regardless of your thoughts whether he should have scored the TD, it was an absolutely bonehead play to go down short of the first. 

Edited by ArtVandalay
  • Like (+1) 6
  • Vomit 3
  • Eyeroll 2
  • Disagree 22
  • Agree 6
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 11
Posted

Yeah, I was in the "he should have scored the TD" camp for the reasons you gave. Ideally, you want to leave no time on the clock, but this ain't Mahomes we're dealing with. I doubt Tua could engineer a miraculous TD drive in the snow with 30 seconds and no TOs.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
  • Dislike 2
Posted
1 minute ago, ArtVandalay said:

Regardless of your thoughts whether he should have scored the TD, it was an absolutely bonehead play to go down short of the first. 


Why? The Dolphins had one timeout left and the Bills had another play to run, so everyone knew they would be able to run the clock out before trying the FG. It didn’t matter at all.

 

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Agree 23
  • Thank you (+1) 6
Posted
Just now, Rubes said:


Why? The Dolphins had one timeout left and the Bills had another play to run, so everyone knew they would be able to run the clock out before trying the FG. It didn’t matter at all.

 

Yes exactly

  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
Quote

McDermott said the Bills practice the play where they’re trying to take time off the clock and thinking the other team might let them score a touchdown.

“We had talked about it. We call it ‘no mas,’ which means no more,” McDermott said. “You’re expecting them to potentially allow you to score right there, based on where the game was, where we had the ball, and the timeout situation.”

If Singletary had scored, the Bills would have taken a 36-29 lead, but also would have had to kick off with 34 seconds left, giving the Dolphins a chance to drive for a touchdown of their own. By going down, Singletary ensured that the game’s final play would be the Bills’ game-winning field goal.

 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 7
Posted
3 minutes ago, ArtVandalay said:

Regardless of your thoughts whether he should have scored the TD, it was an absolutely bonehead play to go down short of the first. 


Ideally, would have been the better move. But “bonehead” is a little harsh. I think he thought he had the first down, and was off probably by 6’inches. If he goes too far, he risks getting pushed into the endzone too.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I thought it was a selfless and incredibly situationally aware play. 

 

You can play the "what if" game with any scenario.  What if he scores and then we miss the PAT and then we pooch kick it and there is a music city miracle.  What if we kick it deep for a touchback and our DB slips and falls down and Hill goes for an 75 yarder. The what-ifs can go on and on and on.

  • Like (+1) 20
  • Agree 24
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted

it was very apparent that Buffalo practiced and rehearsed for this exact situation. to be honest, that's all I really ask for before they attempted. because of that I thought it was a Sound Decision based on our Direct history.

  • Like (+1) 12
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, billsbackto81 said:

It worked but I thought it was the wrong play. That decision was all about Tyreek Hill taking up real estate in McD's head. This was not Mahomes in Arrowhead in favorable conditions. It's Tua in Buffalo on snow. If you can't stop that from scoring a TD with less than a minute and no timeouts then we'll you're not a championship team. 

 

Of course it's JMHO, glad it worked out.

 

It wasn't icy. It was fresh snow that was swept away to kick a chip spot. It was how you do it.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 10
  • Agree 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Not at the table Karlos said:

I was yelling "go down". Did not want to give dolphins a chance to throw deep which they've been very successful with. 


this is a great point. We had been burned by two deep balls this game and a long run already. You want Hamlin out there playing “safety” in the snow on a deep bomb to Hill with 35 seconds left? 

  • Like (+1) 17
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted

It's part of the Bills concerted effort this year the "get W's over all".

 

In years past, the Bills and Josh would be "who they are" and continue to throw the ball, score quickly, etc.

 

The second half of this year they are willing to do whatever it takes to get the W. No style points awarded, they don't care. They believe they are the better team every week and if they just don't mess it up they should win.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, PromoTheRobot said:

 

It wasn't icy. It was fresh snow that was swept away to kick a chip spot. It was how you do it.

 

 

 

I loved watching Spencer Brown put in the extra effort to make sure that the kick spot was perfect, lol

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, BillsBytheBay said:

it was very apparent that Buffalo practiced and rehearsed for this exact situation. to be honest, that's all I really ask for before they attempted. because of that I thought it was a Sound Decision based on our Direct history.


Sort of where I’m at with it.  I understand the decision (13 seconds/Hill effect on McD) and it’s rational to decide it’s better to kick a chip shot field goal then give the other team any time to try for a miracle.  
 

But mostly I’m just glad they’re practicing and coaching situational football - I’ve had my doubts about that all season (including during last night’s game).

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...